I Expect Net Neutrality To Shut Eccie Down or Severely Limit It's Ability To Operate

[Sistine Chapel]

Originally Posted by dmode

Sounds like the standard Marxist talking points.

Corporations bad. Government good. Big brother will take care of us.

Ha.

If that's what you got outta that you have basic comprehension issues. I laid out a well balanced argument...and you come back with some silly shit about Corporations being bad...no one said that....hahahahaha why do I even bother with you folks. Good god SC....

[Guest123018-4]

The facts are that you don't know shit about shit.

[Sistine Chapel]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

The facts are that you don't know shit about shit.

awwe babe....you so sweet. ;-)

[Lincoln.F.Stern]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

If that's what you got outta that you have basic comprehension issues. I laid out a well balanced argument...and you come back with some silly shit about Corporations being bad...no one said that....hahahahaha why do I even bother with you folks. Good god SC....

Net Neutrality is about restricting streaming sites (movie and music) as they use a TON of bandwidth... Eccie is not a bandwidth hog..

S.C. your argument is at best a steaming pile of crap.. the CDA on the other hand deals with "content" not how fast you can get there.

[Sistine Chapel]

Originally Posted by Lincoln.F.Stern

Net Neutrality is about restricting streaming sites (movie and music) as they use a TON of bandwidth... Eccie is not a bandwidth hog..

S.C. your argument is at best a steaming pile of crap.. the CDA on the other hand deals with "content" not how fast you can get there.

you're totally disingenuous... and lying and shilling your ass off. I got a hot date coming over...this mid 20's beautiful white doll...I will fuck with yall sometime this weekend....in the meantime slow down on all your fact twisting. It's not a good look...

[Lincoln.F.Stern]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

you're totally disingenuous... and lying and shilling your ass off. I got a hot date coming over...this mid 20's beautiful white doll...I will fuck with yall sometime this weekend....in the meantime slow down on all your fact twisting. It's not a good look...

Ya know you are soo very much wrong that Net Neutrality will stop you from getting to ECCIE. Had you done 5 minutes of research you would see that they could care less about the type of content but more about the content that uses the most bandwidth. Eccie SIMPLY DOES NOT USE A LOT OF BANDWIDTH

Site like YouTube, Xhamster, Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu - EACH USE abot 1000X more bandwidth than Eccie.

And like your "hot date" that is coming over, you will be disappointed.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

you're totally disingenuous... and lying and shilling your ass off. I got a hot date coming over...this mid 20's beautiful white doll...I will fuck with yall sometime this weekend....in the meantime slow down on all your fact twisting. It's not a good look...

[iquit]

Originally Posted by Lincoln.F.Stern

Ya know you are soo very much wrong that Net Neutrality will stop you from getting to ECCIE. Had you done 5 minutes of research you would see that they could care less about the type of content but more about the content that uses the most bandwidth. Eccie SIMPLY DOES NOT USE A LOT OF BANDWIDTH

Site like YouTube, Xhamster, Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu - EACH USE abot 1000X more bandwidth than Eccie.

And like your "hot date" that is coming over, you will be disappointed.

So..assuming am blocked from accessing netflix, or told to pay more to get it, you are saying corporations should control what content I can or cannot get to.

When a law is written, it covers everything, not just Hulu or netflix. As SC said, some of you lack basic comprehension. If you want a perfect example of what happens, just go back a few years ago when the ISP's decided to block content providers. So though I paid for Internet, there was no content, except what the ISP wanted me to get, and they banded together on it. So first, we let the Internet providers merge to create oligopolies that control services, then now, we take away the rule that prevents them from stiffling the content on it. If that rule that makes it legal for that to happen makes sense to you, then we have bigger problems than just this.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by iquit

If that rule that makes it legal for that to happen makes sense to you, then we have bigger problems than just this.

It's bigger than just the hobby.

[Lincoln.F.Stern]

Originally Posted by iquit

So..assuming am blocked from accessing netflix, or told to pay more to get it, you are saying corporations should control what content I can or cannot get to.

When a law is written, it covers everything, not just Hulu or netflix. As SC said, some of you lack basic comprehension. If you want a perfect example of what happens, just go back a few years ago when the ISP's decided to block content providers. So though I paid for Internet, there was no content, except what the ISP wanted me to get, and they banded together on it. So first, we let the Internet providers merge to create oligopolies that control services, then now, we take away the rule that prevents them from stiffling the content on it. If that rule that makes it legal for that to happen makes sense to you, then we have bigger problems than just this.

Uhh.. when the internet was formed there was no content, FTP sites, telnet servers, newgroup servers (user supplied content), web servers (user supplied content as well as ISP supplied) IRC servers (user chat rooms) etc.. most the content was supplied by users or people not connected to the ISP.

Net Neutrality is targeting (for the Nth time) content providing sites for streaming content and they are going after the largest ones. I seriously doubt that once all this is settled in you will be blocked from Eccie.

This site see's in 1 year probably what NetFlix see's in 1 hour traffic wise.

the CDA petition is more geared at shutting down sites that have illegal content and for now they are focusing on human trafficking so BP and other sites will be the 1st ones they hit. But if they word the language just right in the proposal to include any illegal act then sites like Eccie, Eros, P411, and even individual escort sites can get the person who runs / manages those sites in legal trouble.

But if you are afraid the Net Neutrality will prevent you from getting laid
then I have a site for you that can help you.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Lincoln.F.Stern

This site see's in 1 year probably what NetFlix see's in 1 hour traffic wise.

But if you are afraid the Net Neutrality will prevent you from getting laid
then I have a site for you that can help you.

Like I said, what does this have to do with hookers? Real ones.







On your forehead.

[Lincoln.F.Stern]

the CDA can affect real escort sites should the language of the proposed changes encompass illegal activities. And if that happens any site that displays/advertises illegal activities etc can put the webmaster in hot water.

And I seriously doubt the owner/operator of ECCIE will want to go to court over a site that he did not post any content on.

[eccieuser9500]

Streaming access vs content legality? Or streaming access AND content? Legal and technical language is not my forté.

Besides. This isn't really that important to me. I do this for the funny. Just to get a kick out of life.

[MLC]

<Marked Safe> from net neutrality repeal

[Vaginaterian]

Net Neutrality means that companies that use a huge amount of bandwidth (Netflix, Facebook, etc.) are charged the same as an individual posting their own Blog.

It’s no different than an Electricity Provider. You pay for the kilowatt hours you use. Bandwidth usage should be the same. Pay for what you use.