Your Refusal to Take the Vaccine is Tanking the Stock Market

[pfunkdenver]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

A black family is much more likely to be poor because of a fucked up culture and lower IQs.

Are you saying that, overall, black families have a lower IQ than white families?

[gnadfly]

I believe Tucker showed a clip two nights ago from England that said the folks in British hospitals for COVID, more were vaccinated than unvaccinated.

7 people from THE FULLY VACCINATED runaway Texas Congress had tested positive for COVID out of about 50. I see Psaki and the Dims are trying to categorize this as "breakthru cases." Its not. they are either lying or the vaccine is much less effective than advertised.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Are you saying that, overall, black families have a lower IQ than white families?

It's well known and widely publicized... and it explains the disparate outcomes we see in crime and education much better the "institutional racism." (Institutions are social constructs... by definition, they cannot be racist because they can't think. Now the people that staff them or their policies could be racist, but that can be rectified through lawsuits etc). That's why CRT is ridiculous... replace the word racism with witchcraft and it becomes obvious why it's BS)

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Are you saying that, overall, black families have a lower IQ than white families?

The class of 2020 averaged a score of 523 of 800 on the math section of the SAT, slightly below the College Board's college-readiness benchmark score of 530. ... The average scores for

Black (454)

and Latino or Hispanic students (478) are significantly lower than those of white (547) and Asian students (632)

But here is the catch. There is no study that I am aware of that says Blacks are less capable of achieving the same scores as Whites. There are just other circumstances as to why this anomaly exists but it does.


And just so nobody gets confused about what I just said "White's do not have a superior intellect than Blacks". But Whites test better than Blacks or Hispanics for any number of reasons.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Sapper is about 1 comment away from joining oeb11 due to the unadulterated stupidity in the posts he spews.

Oh NOES!!! NOT THAT. As if I give two shits whether you read what I write or not. You're apparently not capable of understanding the math anyway.

Besides you advocate that ethnics NEED to be taken care of by more capable folks anyway.

Go ahead, Block me, I can still have fun laughing at your ignorance.

[HedonistForever]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

More poor whites. It’s a simple concept.

I think you were singing a different tune in our discussion about laws being written specifically against Blacks when you seem to suggest that laws that hurt the poor, impact Blacks most because there are more poor Blacks than Whites.

Now, as a percentage of each population, that might be correct.

Any voting law written that will impact the poor more than others, will therefore impact more Whites than Blacks.

And since no voting law specifically mentions race, there are no laws, voting or otherwise designed to hurt only Blacks.

There is no systemic racism in America.

So it would be fair to say that any law written, impacts Whites more than Blacks.

Unless of course we are talking about the many bills Biden wants to pass that spells out "Blacks need only to apply", which of course the courts have just shot down as being un-constitutional.

Who the fuck didn't know that?

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Whites test better than Blacks or Hispanics for any number of reasons.

That's because the concepts of a right answer and a wrong answer are RAYCISS!

[HedonistForever]

What I believe is that White people are not inherently smarter than Black people. Color has nothing to do with the human brain and it's ability to learn that I'm aware of.


And to me, the definition of a racist, is a person who disagrees with that. If you think one race in inherently, intellectually superior to another, you are most likely a racist.


Just an opinion.

[1blackman1]

Originally Posted by texassapper

Oh NOES!!! NOT THAT. As if I give two shits whether you read what I write or not. You're apparently not capable of understanding the math anyway.

Besides you advocate that ethnics NEED to be taken care of by more capable folks anyway.

Go ahead, Block me, I can still have fun laughing at your ignorance.

Goodbye Sapper. Can’t say I’ll miss anything you post.

[1blackman1]

texassapper
This message is hidden because texassapper is on your ignore list.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

What I believe is that White people are not inherently smarter than Black people. Color has nothing to do with the human brain and it's ability to learn that I'm aware of.

You aren't being ASKED to believe it. The above charts aren't a form of RAYCISS!. They are simple facts. There are probably a basketful of reasons WHY blacks have lower average IQs than other races but it has zero to do with melanin content and everything to do with OTHER genetic markers.

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

And to me, the definition of a racist, is a person who disagrees with that. If you think one race in inherently, intellectually superior to another, you are most likely a racist.

So what's your explanation for why blacks have lower average IQ? It's all nurture not nature?

And what makes Asians good at taking tests then? Regardless of geographic and multi cultural influences? Asians raised in US culture still score higher even after attending the same schools. That's why higher ed discriminates AGAINST Asians in favor of other more colorful minorities because they defy the narrative. And if the whole everything is RAYCISS! doesn't hold up against one minority, why is it valid for others?

Could it be parental? Maybe waiting for marriage before having kids is RAYCISS! too?

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Just an opinion.

fine to have one. Just try and square it with the facts.

[1blackman1]

Originally Posted by HedonistForever

I think you were singing a different tune in our discussion about laws being written specifically against Blacks when you seem to suggest that laws that hurt the poor, impact Blacks most because there are more poor Blacks than Whites.

Now, as a percentage of each population, that might be correct.

Any voting law written that will impact the poor more than others, will therefore impact more Whites than Blacks.

And since no voting law specifically mentions race, there are no laws, voting or otherwise designed to hurt only Blacks.

There is no systemic racism in America.

So it would be fair to say that any law written, impacts Whites more than Blacks.

Unless of course we are talking about the many bills Biden wants to pass that spells out "Blacks need only to apply", which of course the courts have just shot down as being un-constitutional.

Who the fuck didn't know that?

I believe my tune is consistent. If there are more poor blacks as a percentage of blacks than poor whites as a percentage of whites, laws rules and regulations that Effect the poor would have a larger adverse effect on blacks. That’s a simple concept.

If something effects 30% of group A and 15% of group B then the effect is more harmful to group A even if the total number is larger for group B.

Now i agree that nearly every law affects all groups across the board (I say nearly as some I can’t think of could be easily brought up). But most laws have and may intentionally or unintentionally have a disparate impact on one group over another. One that’s often brought up is crack vs powder. Same drug but since crack was prevalent in black neighborhoods harsher sentencing befell blacks for similar amounts of drugs. Was that aimed at blacks (likely) but it never had to be stated that it was to punish blacks more than whites.

I would presume that if the sentencing for meth was greater than coke or crack (I am just using an example as I don’t know the answer to that) someone could argue that it has a disparate impact on whites since there is (I believe) a greater use rate amongst poor whites.

But drug and criminal sentencing is a different discussion for a different day. I’m just using it as an example of how disparate impact works.

[1blackman1]

texassapper
This message is hidden because texassapper is on your ignore list.

Just a reminder for you.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

texassapper
This message is hidden because texassapper is on your ignore list.

Apparently you don't understand how blocking someone works ;-)

you're not SUPPOSED to be interested in what I have to say... and yet here you are.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

texassapper
This message is hidden because texassapper is on your ignore list.

Just a reminder for you.

Starting to look like a cry for help.