Is Obama a Marxist?

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

You want me to concede that it's possible that I'm wrong? Of course it's possible. I make mistakes like everyone else. I'm just expressing my opinion. I don't think I'm wrong about Obama being a communist, but anything is possible. Nothing you've written has made me any less convinced that he's a communist.

I never expected to or tried to change your mind about Obama. I can only speak for me and what I think.

You'll continue to speak your opinion and I'll continue to speak mine. If I see some info I think is wrong, I'll research it to see if it is. And right or wrong, I learn more about the subject matter.

[joe bloe]

That sounds reasonable to me.

[Guest123018-4]

As to the original question.
Well duh!
Is the Pope Catholic?
Is a pigs pussy pork?
Can a fish swim?
Does it hurt when you rack your nuts?

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

As to the original question.
Well duh!
Is the Pope Catholic?
Is a pigs pussy pork?
Can a fish swim?
Does it hurt when you rack your nuts?

I agree. But of course that's only my opinion and I could be wrong. I'm only human

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I agree. But of course that's only my opinion and I could be wrong. I'm only human

Good call.

Now if only those dogs could catch on. As canines they dodge that "I'm only human" deal.

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

As to the original question.
Well duh!
Is the Pope Catholic?
Is a pigs pussy pork?
Can a fish swim?
Does it hurt when you rack your nuts?

we call it pork uteri in the meat biz

[rodog44]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

To be fair, successfully defending Obama against the charge of being a Marxist is an impossible task; but the lefties are certainly making a spirited attempt. What their arguments lack in logic is more than made up for with an abundance of hate, anger and lies. As I mentioned in a prior post, "the worst are full of passionate intensity" It's actually the truthfulness of the accusation that really makes the leftists furious. At some level, I think they know Obama is a dangerous radical. The evidence supporting the accusation is overwhelming. The left can deny the obvious conclusion, but that doesn't mean they don't know it's true.

Watching the leftist nutjobs react to the accusation of calling Obama a Marxist gives me a sense of deja vu. It reminds me of the way the Islamists overreact to any insult to their religion, real or imagined. A couple of Korans get burned by accident, and they go completely berserk.

You could not have explained it any better

[JD Barleycorn]

So munchie, what would it take to convince you? You said there was something. What is it? Yes, I am trying to pin you down and trying to illustrate how far you've wandered from reality.

Court room evidence??? Obviously not a lawyer... In a CRIMINAL trial the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil trial it is the preponderance of the evidence. So which is it?

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Court of law acceptable evidence that can't be interpreted any other way as the standard in a criminal trial.


What would it take for you to accept (do you wonder why people complain about our schools and teachers?) that he is not?

You claim he is guilty.
Since Americans believe someone is innocent until proven guilty, what do you believe?

In this post above I pretty much layed out my conditions. I also asked you guys what it would take for you to admit innocence. I've seen many folks pass right by our question to ask yours

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

So munchie, what would it take to convince you? You said there was something. What is it? Yes, I am trying to pin you down and trying to illustrate how far you've wandered from reality.
Well see how far somedody is from la la land
Court room evidence??? Obviously not a lawyer... In a CRIMINAL trial the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil trial it is the preponderance of the evidence. So which is it?

Tell me your standard and what you will acceppt to prove innocence

[JD Barleycorn]

I asked the question first.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

So munchie, what would it take to convince you? You said there was something. What is it? Yes, I am trying to pin you down and trying to illustrate how far you've wandered from reality.

This would convince me.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by Doove

This would convince me.

I see, so it's a witch hunt. An innocent man unfairly accused by a hysterical mob. You know there really are communists in the world. We are able to recognize them by the things they say and do. If it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck a reasonable person has to concede it's a duck.

Trying to convince left wingers that Obama is a communist reminds me of another Monty Python sketch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjOSLCR2hE

[Doove]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I see, so it's a witch hunt. An innocent man unfairly accused by a hysterical mob.

Well, if by "hysterical mob" you mean "bunch of idiots", then yeah, that's exactly what this is.

You know there really are communists in the world. We are able to recognize them by the things they say and do. If it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck a reasonable person has to concede it's a duck.

Again, pointing out things Obama has said or done and suggesting a Marxist would do or say that so Obama's obviously a Marxist is, well, it's dumb. There's just no other way to describe it. Obama is no more a Marxist than Bush was a Fascist.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Doove

Well, if by "hysterical mob" you mean "bunch of idiots", then yeah, that's exactly what this is.



.

LOL, even you righties gotta admit that was a funny one

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Doove

Obama is no more a Marxist than Bush was a Fascist.

So, you're agreeing that Obama is a Marxist?