Tom Delay Finally COMPLETLY Cleared By Texas's Highest Court.

[Yssup Rider]

Hi Jack!

Sobbrin, you never disappoint.

OK, not us. Maybe your family...

[WTF]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Why don't you tell us what you perceive the difference is, WTF the moronic buffoon?

Or is it the "they are both corrupt liars" tool out of your tiny toolkit?

There is no difference when it comes to spending our money and telling lies on the other.
'Course you just think one side does it....or does it better!


.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Have you figured out any difference LL?

Did I say there was a difference?

You apparently are not old enough or had enough awareness.

Your ignorance is emphasized by your conclusion that "checks" are "money"!

I'm not going to waste any further time on your "education," but it should be enough to point out the distinction (in Texas) between a "check" and "money" was made when the Democrats were controlling the Texas House and Senate and the "Tea Party" (as identifying any political group) was not even a figment in anyone's imagination.

But you carry on post after post spewing your dumb-ass remarks. You even got YouRong chiming in on the same stupidity.

But as a "hand-to-mouth" and "borrow-from-Peter-to-Pay-Paul" residential construction contractor, who relies on illegal labor to make a profit, you SHOULD KNOW that a "check" is not "money," because 99% of the folks who get "checks" from you, run to the bank drive through on which your "CHECKS" are written to convert them to "money" so when the deposit the "money" in their bank accounts they will know the "money" won't bounce!

Then your next "theme" (after the "checks are money" bullshit didn't hold water) is to start this irrelevant crap about "well we all know he did it" and so it was a political hack job just to get off a fellow Republican.

Perhaps those self-proclaimed brilliant, intellectual liberals in Travis County should elect a DA who is smart enough to either offer admissible evidence to prove the crimes she charges or smart enough not to file charges she can't prove with admissible evidence. (Note: Your opinion is not admissible evidence of a crime .. in fact your opinion is probably not relevant and probative of any "fact" sought to be proven.)

Back to your "new" dumb question: What "difference" does it make?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Did I say there was a difference?

You apparently are not old enough or had enough awareness.

Your ignorance is emphasized by your conclusion that "checks" are "money"

Is there ever an end to LLIdiot's gibberish?

He needs to quit living off of the welfare state and find himself a meaningful job. That is, if anyone would be foolish enough to hire him. In and of itself, that is probably the reason he is living off of the welfare state. A reputable employer wouldn't put up with his arrogant, condescending attitude.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Is there ever an end to LLIdiot's gibberish?

You don't like the topic of the thread? Didn't go "your way" did it?

More "gibberish" .... according to BigTitsLiarStalker:

Here are the quotes on the deciding points in the opinion:

"Ultimately, we agree with the court of appeals that the appellant’s convictions cannot stand because there is no possible view of the evidence that can establish that any transaction alleged to comprise money laundering involved the proceeds of a felony violation of the Texas Election Code, under either theory of criminal proceeds.

There is nothing in the record to show that the appellant knew that he was conducting, supervising, or facilitating a transaction that involved the proceeds of criminal activity. The State has failed to establish the requisite culpable mental state to prove the offenses of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

However, as we read Section 34.02(a)(2) of the Penal Code, it is an element of the offense of money laundering that the actor was aware of the fact that the money he is purported to have laundered was the proceeds of felony criminal activity. The federal money laundering statute similarly requires knowledge that the funds constitute ill-gotten gains. See 18 U.S.C. 1956(a)(1) (“Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity . . . .”); United States v. Morelli, 169 F.3d 798, 804 (3d Cir. 1999) (one of the elements of money laundering under this provision is “knowledge that the transaction involves the proceeds of some unlawful activity”).

"Because the State has failed to prove that the corporate contributors harbored the requisite mens rea to establish an offense under the Election Code, we agree with the court of appeals that it has not established that the money conveyed by TRMPAC to RNSEC constituted the proceeds of criminal activity for purposes of money laundering or conspiracy to commit money laundering."

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You don't like the topic of the thread?

Please cite the post number where I expressed that I didn't "like the topic of the thread."

And while you're looking for things, go find yourself a meaningful job and quit livin' off the 'gubment'.

Something other than nonstop bitching and moaning!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Is that kinda like the Democrat Controlled Cesspool in the White House?

Originally Posted by WTF

Please tell me the difference between the Democrat Controlled Cesspool in the White House and the GOP Controlled Cesspool in Texas at the state level.

Can you do that you hypocritical partisan hack?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Did I say there was a difference?

So you are saying there is no difference between the Democratic controlled cesspool in the White House and the GOP controlled cesspool in the Texas State House?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Perhaps those self-proclaimed brilliant, intellectual liberals in Travis County should elect a DA who is smart enough to either offer admissible evidence to prove the crimes she charges or smart enough not to file charges she can't prove with admissible evidence.

Now tell me the difference between the self-proclaimed brilliant, intellectual liberals in Travis County and the self-proclaimed brilliant, intellectual Democrat named LexusLover on eccie.



Maybe one day you will come to understand that we are all political creatures fighting for power and the one who has it , abuses it. So you have Tom DeLay abusing power crying about a prosecutor abusing power....and you still do not have a clue as to how the game is played. You think it is about right and wrong and the 'Law'. It is about power LL. And power comes from those checks you do not think are money.


.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Maybe one day you will come to understand that we are all political creatures fighting for power and the one who has it , abuses it.

Is the "we" both of your personalities or all of them?

Does one of your personalities "abuse" another one, after "fighting for power"?

I never asked any of the folks down at the freeway begging for MONEY (not CHECKS) to identify their "political" affiliation, but I guess I should start.

Have you?

I do consider myself to be a Democrat. Still.

Any time you or your Master-BT ... "feel" there is no room in the Democratic Party for me ... send me an announcement here in this forum. I'll ponder it.

Even Ted Poe is "coming around"!!! When are you all?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Something other than nonstop bitching and moaning!

That's all you do is bitch and moan. Pass hot air, and stink up "the room."

English isn't your 2nd language is it.

The reason why I pay "self-employment" taxes is .....?

And the reason why I HAVE TO PAY "self-employment" taxes is ....?

Looks like to me a case of the "pot calling the kettle" ... in your case.

Still haven't found my OMPF have you?

In fact: You don't know shit about me or you are LYING AGAIN!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Is that kinda like the Democrat Controlled Cesspool in the White House?

Originally Posted by WTF

Please tell me the difference between the Democrat Controlled Cesspool in the White House and the GOP Controlled Cesspool in Texas at the state level.

Can you do that you hypocritical partisan hack?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Did I say there was a difference?

So you are saying there is no difference between the Democratic controlled cesspool in the White House and the GOP controlled cesspool in the Texas State House?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Perhaps those self-proclaimed brilliant, intellectual liberals in Travis County should elect a DA who is smart enough to either offer admissible evidence to prove the crimes she charges or smart enough not to file charges she can't prove with admissible evidence.

Now tell me the difference between the self-proclaimed brilliant, intellectual liberals in Travis County and the self-proclaimed brilliant, intellectual Democrat named LexusLover on eccie.



Maybe one day you will come to understand that we are all political creatures fighting for power and the one who has it , abuses it. So you have Tom DeLay abusing power crying about a prosecutor abusing power....and you still do not have a clue as to how the game is played. You think it is about right and wrong and the 'Law'. It is about power LL. And power comes from those checks you do not think are money.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

So you are saying there is no difference between the Democratic controlled cesspool in the White House and the GOP controlled cesspool in the Texas State House?

No.

Why do you obsessively rewrite what people DON'T POST and try to make it look like other people post shit you want them to post, so you can continue having a dialogue with yourself and your hair-brain thoughts.

Please don't take my lack of any further response today as an admission.

[WTF]

LexusLiar....how many Hot Checks have you written? You do understand that over a certain amount is a felony? Try and convince the Texas voters that a check is not money. Even Tom DeLay's GOP controlled district knew he was full of shit on that whopper of a lie and was going to vote him out. That is why he quit.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

No.

Why do you obsessively rewrite what people DON'T POST and try to make it look like other people post shit you want them to post, so you can continue having a dialogue with yourself and your hair-brain thoughts.

Please don't take my lack of any further response today as an admission.

It best for you to run along when you are getting your ass handed to you.

Please tell me the difference between the White House cesspool and the Texas State House cesspool or run along with your superior intellectual Travis County like attitude.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Try and convince the Texas voters that a check is not money.

How many times have you had a $100 bill returned "NSF"?

Keep it up, child.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

[SIZE="3"]It best for you to run along when you are getting your ass handed to you.

If you weren't so sad, you would be funny.

Still think a "check is money" do you?