Senator Fauxcahauntas Is White

[WTF]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

. What I want is the raw results of her test.

Here are some facts....better than these parroted talking points many on the right are using...




How genetic material actually travels through generations. (Coop Lab, University of California Davis)
The most important point is this: The results in Warren’s DNA test are static. The percentage of Native American DNA in her genome does not shrink as you go back generations. There could be one individual in the sixth generation — living around the mid-1800s, which is similar to Warren family lore — or possibly a dozen or more ancestors back to the 10th generation, which would be about 250 years ago. Her results are consistent with a single ancestor, however.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by gnadfly
. What I want is the raw results of her test.

Here are some facts....better than these parroted talking points many on the right are using...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.37c678917cb7


.
How genetic material actually travels through generations. (Coop Lab, University of California Davis)
The most important point is this: The results in Warren’s DNA test are static. The percentage of Native American DNA in her genome does not shrink as you go back generations. There could be one individual in the sixth generation — living around the mid-1800s, which is similar to Warren family lore — or possibly a dozen or more ancestors back to the 10th generation, which would be about 250 years ago. Her results are consistent with a single ancestor, however.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Here are some facts....better than these parroted talking points many on the right are using...

So what's your "point"? Are you a genealogist now?

Or are you claiming Fauxcahontas is part Porcupine?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

So what's your "point"? Are you a genealogist now?

Or are you claiming Fauxcahontas is part Porcupine?

Damn stalker...

The point of the article was that many folks have misinterpreted the actual test in an unfavorable light to Mrs Warren.

My article highlights why you and others are wrong in how you are portraying the information

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Damn stalker...

The point of the article was that many folks have misinterpreted the actual test in an unfavorable light to Mrs Warren.

My article highlights why you and others are wrong in how you are portraying the information

Who is stalking you? That porcupine?

Please cite specifically where and how I have misinterpreted or wrongly portrayed the results of Warren's DNA test.

If you can't do that, would you kindly admit you have me confused with another poster. Thanks!

[Lantern2814]

There is nothing to misinterpret here. Fauxcaontas lied and just got it proven. Less than .001 "Native American". Spin it until you're dizzy but you can't change it. Even the Cherokee Nation won't accept this as any sort of proof.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by WTF

Originally Posted by gnadfly
. What I want is the raw results of her test.

Here are some facts....better than these parroted talking points many on the right are using...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.37c678917cb7


.
How genetic material actually travels through generations. (Coop Lab, University of California Davis)
The most important point is this: The results in Warren’s DNA test are static. The percentage of Native American DNA in her genome does not shrink as you go back generations. There could be one individual in the sixth generation — living around the mid-1800s, which is similar to Warren family lore — or possibly a dozen or more ancestors back to the 10th generation, which would be about 250 years ago. Her results are consistent with a single ancestor, however.

Originally Posted by Lantern2814

There is nothing to misinterpret here. Fauxcaontas lied and just got it proven. Less than .001 "Native American". Spin it until you're dizzy but you can't change it. Even the Cherokee Nation won't accept this as any sort of proof.

Actually she did not lie and if you'd read the above article I linked and were capable of understanding simple science, you'd understand that fact.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by WTF

Actually she did not lie and if you'd read the above article I linked and were capable of understanding simple science, you'd understand that fact.

How can this dna data set be valid?



there's no cherokee DNA in that data set which was compromised of Central American and South American Indian DNA data sets.


this dna data was flawed. doesn't matter if it was "static" as your author puts it.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Actually she did not lie and if you'd read the above article I linked and were capable of understanding simple science, you'd understand that fact.

Liawatha lied when she claimed her grandparents on her father's side were racists against her mother's supposed Native American blood line from five to eight generations earlier. Such things when not advertised or obvious are forgotten after two or three generations ... let alone six to ten.

[Lantern2814]

WTF if you would actually listen to the lies Warren has been throwing out maybe you would understand what's going on. Keep up with the insults and you'll be on the sidelines with Sistine. Or those rouge chairs......

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Liawatha lied when she claimed her grandparents on her father's side were racists against her mother's supposed Native American blood line from five to eight generations earlier. Such things when not advertised or obvious are forgotten after two or three generations ... let alone six to ten.

That seems very subjective on your part.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Lantern2814

WTF if you would actually listen to the lies Warren has been throwing out maybe you would understand what's going on. Keep up with the insults and you'll be on the sidelines with Sistine. Or those rouge chairs......

Insults?

It is simple science people are not being able to keep up with.

And if you gents on the Right were concerened about lies, you'd not be wearing a MAGA hat brought yo you by the biggest liar in America!

[Lantern2814]

Says a Hitlery supporter. But hey, keep buying the BS being shoved at you as the Cherokee Nation themselves slams Warren. I'll take their words over your guessing.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Lantern2814

Says a Hitlery supporter. But hey, keep buying the BS being shoved at you as the Cherokee Nation themselves slams Warren. I'll take their words over your guessing.

I'm not guessing, I'm presenting the facts.

You're guessing and guessing wrong that I supported Hillary Clinton.

I did not support her because of the rotten Clinton Foundation and how they did not separate themselves from that.

Trump is no different as far as how he has not made a complete break from his businesses.

Any other misnomers I need to set straight

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

That seems very subjective on your part.

Not at all! One need only look to the Landrieu's of Louisiana, Mitch (former dim-retard Mayor of New Orleans) and Mary (former dim-retard Senator from Louisiana). Their grandfather, Joseph Landrieu b: 1892, was enumerated as "black" on the 1900 census but thereafter reported as "white".

Mitch lost his first campaign against Marc Morial (black) because Mitch's black ancestry was all but forgotten in a mere two generations. Thus, Mitch lost because he was considered the "white" candidate because his grandfather and father had successfully broke through the racial barrier and identified as "white" despite having a black progenitor.

So, Liawatha's claim that her grandparents on her father's side remembered something that had not been advertised by her parents on her mother's side for over 150 years is bullshit.