Kerry signs UN small arms treaty.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by CJ7

Go fuck each other.

Shh, don't tell "Sweet Ass" IIFFY that that Hanoi COG is running around on him!

[therock18]

Apparently you didn't read the article I posted or I B Hankering's post because if your illiterate ass could read then you would know that the Constitution makes a treaty law. You should take your head out of your ass!!!!

Originally Posted by CJ7

I said the constitution trumps an international treaty, and it does.

neither one of you miserable shitheads can show the audience where the treaty strips americans of their 2nd amendment rights because it doesn't. Go fuck each other.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by therock18

Apparently you didn't read the article I posted or I B Hankering's post because if your illiterate ass could read then you would know that the Constitution makes a treaty law. You should take your head out of your ass!!!!

apparently you cant tell me what part of the treaty breaks the Constitution, namely,

the 2nd amendment


can you?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

apparently you cant tell me what part of the treaty breaks the Constitution, namely,

the 2nd amendment


can you?

Because that determination will be made by the Supremes, CBJ7.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Because that determination will be made by the Supremes, CBJ7.

OH SNAP ! the SC decides if the treaty can strip you of your 2nd amendment rights?

you are a total dumbass

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

OH SNAP ! the SC decides if the treaty can strip you of your 2nd amendment rights?

you are a total dumbass

Yep! Could happen if and when you have a lib-retard majority sitting on the bench, CBJ7.

[nwarounder]

Pretty sure we have a treaty out there that that the people of CO and WA just recently gave a big "fuck you" to our federal government and all those other countries that signed a treaty with us, and red states will do the same with this treaty if the feds try to step on our toes on this one.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yep! Could happen if and when you have a lib-retard majority sitting on the bench, CBJ7.

bullshit, the treaty has no constitutional implication to begin with.

could happen ... you could grow a brain too, but not very likely

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by CJ7

bullshit, the treaty has no constitutional implication to begin with.

If you omit the words "infringe" out of the Constitution, you are correct.

[Jewish Lawyer]

If this site is any indication of the fractious nature of American politics - were headed for a civil war!
Each side hates the other and will not give an inch, demonizes the other side, and assumes what amounts to a line in the sand.
As they say in the ghetto, "This shit be fucked up!"

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

If you omit the words "infringe" out of the Constitution, you are correct.

no need to omit anything there never has been a threat to your 2nd amendment rights, and never will


funny thing, not one of you sliiy little bitches can prove it either

could be
omit this
yada yada yada

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

If this site is any indication of the fractious nature of American politics - were headed for a civil war!
Each side hates the other and will not give an inch, demonizes the other side, and assumes what amounts to a line in the sand.
As they say in the ghetto, "This shit be fucked up!"

It's only the anonymity that makes it seem like that here, or at least in my experience people don't behave in this manner when their is the possibility of an ass whooping coming their way.

[nwarounder]

Originally Posted by CJ7

no need to omit anything there never has been a threat to your 2nd amendment rights, and never will


funny thing, not one of you sliiy little bitches can prove it either

could be
omit this
yada yada yada

We obviously disagree on the definition of infringe.

"encroach on somebody's rights or property: to take over land, rights, privileges, or activities that belong to somebody else, especially in a minor or gradual way"

Heavy emphasis on the last seven words, but I agree we still have the right to bear arms, just that it has been infringed upon already and the treaty, if twisted or contorted, could lead to further infringement.

It's really funny to here a lib talk about gun control and making people have an ID and a back ground check to purchase a gun, and how that is NOT an infringement on the 2nd Amendment, but when you apply those same standards, and even less, by requiring an ID to vote it IS an infringement on their Constitutional rights. Appreciate the comedy!

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

We obviously disagree on the definition of infringe.

"encroach on somebody's rights or property: to take over land, rights, privileges, or activities that belong to somebody else, especially in a minor or gradual way"

Heavy emphasis on the last seven words, but I agree we still have the right to bear arms, just that it has been infringed upon already and the treaty, if twisted or contorted, could lead to further infringement.

then show me where the treaty infringes on ANY of your constitutional rights

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

bullshit, the treaty has no constitutional implication to begin with.

could happen ... you could grow a brain too, but not very likely

So now you're very ignorantly arguing that the Supreme Court doesn't rule on constitutionality, CBJ7?