Jackie our girl Condalisa

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

So is he Humpty, Marshal or JL?

Or is it John Cornyn?

Regardless, his verbose ass has been on ignore since before his last "flare-up."

Compared to a stammering, inarticulate, vocabulary-challenged dipshit like you, everyone is "verbose"!

A weighty oinkboy post ---->...."SNICK!"

Too skeered to WK for LubedAss all of a sudden?

Those B-52s will be back... better hunker down bunker clown!

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Those B-52s will be back... better hunker down bunker clown!

those B-52 are loaded with steorids.

[gary5912]

Originally Posted by herfacechair

MT Cranial Cavity: I think I see what the problem is here!

Based on your first reply to me on this thread, no, you have absolutely no clue about what you're talking about on this thread, or anywhere else for that matter. I was going to ignore all of your posts until you decided to grace me with your ignorance. Now sit back, relax, and watch me demonstrate to you how much you know of what isn't the case.

MT Cranial Cavity: RM thought if she mingled with the Conservatives she would drum up business.

RM is doing what I've seen providers do on both this message board, and on others like it across the country... Get exposure. If your cranium wasn't MT save for the occasional toy monkey banging its cymbals in there, you'd see that.

MT Cranial Cavity: It has back-fired miserably.

And you base this on what? Do you have her actual, raw data, information listing how many contacts she has had, and how many of those who contacted her actually followed through with a session? The reality is that you don't know if her jumping on here has impacted her business or not, just as you wouldn't know if the other providers that do this have successfully drummed their numbers up, or negatively impacted their business.

MT Cranial Cavity: Just because they outnumber the Liberals

Again, what are you basing this on? When I first jumped onto this site, conservatives were outnumbered. That appeared to have changed since I jumped on here and started to hammer these liberals head on. I've seen many of those on the conservative side of the house start using my tactics against the liberals. Now, it appears, they're shoving you people arse's down your collective throats. What I see happening is that many of the liberals are wisely not making your mistake... Opening their mouths and proving that they don't have a clue about what they're talking about.

MT Cranial Cavity: doesn't mean they actually see women.

I'm a conservative, and I see women. Every conservative that I know off also sees women. The fact that you don't see an increase in her reviews isn't a valid indicator on whether her business has gone up, down, or stagnated. Again, for every guy that leaves a review, many more go on without leaving a review. Pardon me if many of the conservatives here don't want to give you something to beat off to.

MT Cranial Cavity: She is a paid actor

If you had any experience with women outside of the hobby, you'd know that the most expensive woman you'll have is the one that you're married to. Much more so if you decide to get a divorce... In which case, you get a different form of fucking for the money that you're shelling out.

MT Cranial Cavity: and and they are broke ass blowhards.

Based on my situation, as well as that of the other conservatives, there's an excellent chance that most are TOO BUSY to drum up a review. I have posted a lot of reviews in the past on the account of my freelance writer background, as well as the fact that I use speech to text software to generate my posts.

Most of the broke ass blowhards that I know of are liberals and think like you and others that I argue against over here.

MT Cranial Cavity: Should have went with the Liberals

Nobody wants to go full-blown retard, so no, glad no real conservative went with the liberals.

MT Cranial Cavity: that don't let King James cock block them.

Coming from someone whose line of reasoning reminds me of someone trying to talk with his/her mouth full of cock.

MT Cranial Cavity: Hell I might see you If I get down that way. I just might not share my handle till we are done. LOL!

Actually, what would actually be something worth noticing is you demonstrating that you could use your head here for something other than a hair rack.

MT Brain Cavity: Your team didn't think that Dems would vote for Obama. That is why so many voted for him in the Primary.

False, they voted for him in the primary because they are gullible and susceptible to propaganda. They are low information voters who don't have a clue about current events, history, or anything that makes the real-world work on a geopolitical, geoeconomic, and geostrategic level. The media, complacent in its duties, failed to do what I remember it doing during the Democratic primaries in the 1980s, effectively vet the empty suite. They voted for him during the primary, and during the general election, because they were easily led by the nose ring by a media more interested in propagating propaganda than they were in actually doing the news.

I remember when Hillary Clinton went on Fox News, during the election of 2008. I remember her complementing Fox News over its fair coverage of the Democratic primaries. But the conservatives did not count on how deteriorated journalism has become since the 1980s.

MT Cranial Cavity: Carson was raised by basically a sharecropper and did receive welfare,just not section 8 housing. He also thinks college should be free for medical students. So how does that make him so special?

That's irrelevant. You failed to address the comment of the poster that you are addressing. All you really did, with this comment, is pointed to evidence that he lifted himself up by his bootstraps. The fact of the matter is that he does threaten the narrative that the criminally biased liberal media paints regarding Republicans and race. Obama had the help of a media that was more interested in presenting propaganda than it was in doing its job. Had the media been like the media that I watched back in the 1980s, Obama would've been vetted and he would've had to drop out of the primaries. Unlike Obama, Carson dealt with the forces of the free market and had a better understanding of how the free market worked than the community organizer did.

MT Cranial Cavity: Without Comey and Putin nobody would have beaten Hillary.

False. What didn't get as much attention, in the news regarding Russian interference, is that the fake news went to a small fraction of the population and did not impact the overall election. Do continue to make assumptions like this, you people keep missing the point as to why he won the electoral college, which was what he was going for.

Had the media actually did its job, we wouldn't be getting candidates, on the liberal side, who are to the far extreme left of the political spectrum where we ended up with Spillage Shrillery and Bolshevik Bernie.

MT Cranial Cavity: I will say this. I would trade Trump for any of the other candidates that ran including Kasich or Cruz.

The fact that someone like you, and the others on this thread who oppose him, don't like him, makes him even a better choice. People like you make me even happier for voting for him. However, had the Republican Party denied him the nomination, whoever the Democrats nominated would have won.

MT Cranial Cavity: Since I am not a Liberal I guess that was a waste of your time.

Your initial response to me in this thread, as well as the other things that you have said elsewhere in this thread, points to you as being a liberal. I've been arguing against liberals, online, for the past 13 years. I've yet have somebody who is in the middle of the political spectrum, or the conservative side of it, question my statements regarding my military background, or regarding my calling somebody else out on theirs. The fact that you did, added to the other liberal arguments that you have advanced on this thread, speak strongly to you being a liberal. In both responses to me, and to the other conservatives on this thread, you have gone by the same playbook that I have seen liberals go by over the past 13 years I have debated with them online.

So no, nobody wasted their time in sizing you up as a liberal, and in identifying how you liberals think. I get that as well, you made assumptions about what I meant, who I am, and what I was talking about, which doesn't end well for liberals. You're about to find that out here shortly.

If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and cracked like a duck, it must be a duck.

MT Cranial Cavity: But then again from the way you pigeon hole everyone I guess I am.

No, he didn't pigeonhole anybody. Your actions on this thread, and apparently your actions elsewhere on this message board, clearly identified you as a typical liberal. His referencing you as a liberal is no different than anybody referencing a cow as a cow. You act like a liberal, argue like a liberal, hence you're going to get called a liberal. I've lost count of how many liberals, that I have debated with over the past 13 years, who have insisted that they were not liberals and that I or another conservative had it "wrong" about them being liberal.

MT Cranial Cavity: To you anyone that does not lockstep with the conservatives is a Liberal.

False. Anybody that ACTS like a liberal is going to be identified as a liberal. For instance, your reply to me in this thread is typical of the reply I received from other liberals when I have made similar comments. We conservatives are not in complete agreement here or elsewhere. By your definition, I would be a "liberal" in those areas LL and I would not be in agreement on. Don't worry, I've hammered other liberals for thinking the way you think right here. You're not the first liberal that I have seen make that assumption.

MT Cranial Cavity: Except I haven't seen you call an actual Libertarian one.

There's a difference between the liberals that we argue against here, and elsewhere, and the libertarians. No, you guys are not libertarians. There's liberal, as in embracing the mindset, philosophy, and reasoning of those who are close to the socialist/communist parts of the Democratic Party. That is the category that you, and those that I have argued against over the past 13 years, fall under.

Libertarians are less likely to say things to me that you said to me in your first response on this thread. In fact, not only have they seen the facts and supported me with these facts, especially when it comes to arguments related to the military, they have been my strongest supporters. So yes, there is a difference. If you are implying that you are Libertarian, I assure you, you are not one.

Political tests that I've taken have placed me in the libertarian portion of the conservative side of the political spectrum. There is a difference between where I stand, and were liberals stand. You, with nothing in your cranial cavity other than an occational toy monkey banging its cymbals, are liberal.

MT Cranial Cavity: By the way, any person that reads your post would know how you think.

I've read his posts, what he thinks is not the same thing as what you think he thinks. What you think he thinks is nothing but a cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all, caricature of what your liberal talking head taskmasters have painted of us and have force-fed you into believing.

MT Cranial Cavity: Now whomever you are in real life may be a much different person. Most likely a frightened child like man. You are most likely a modern day wizard of OZ.

I've read his posts elsewhere on this board in addition to this thread. Both my current military background, which involves reviewing people's psychological profile, as well as my freelance writing background, entail the professional necessity to see a person's psychological makeup based on what they say on the Internet and elsewhere. As applied to here, what you guys say in your posts creates an obvious psychological profile. I don't recognize your assumption, of who he is as a person outside of this website, and him as I've seen his posts.

I don't say this lightly either. I received verification of the accuracy psychological profile I have come up with regarding the people that I have debated with online. This happened on a stolen valor site, where I had identified the psychological profile of a valor thief. Naturally, he disagreed. However, when his ex-wife jumped on thread, she verified the profile that I had on him as being accurate.

I tend to "abuse" this skill set to get the opposition to react the way I want them to react, then to expose their true nature. They may think that they are regaining control, but they don't realize that they are exposing more of their psychological makeup to me.

Let's hope that your assumptions of who he is, and of who I am, is not like your marksmanship skills. If so, I would hate to be the person standing behind you as you attempt to shoot the target in front of you, that would be suicide. That's how far off you are.

MT Cranial Cavity: If he does put me in my place he will be the first on here.

No, I'm not the first one to put you in your place, I've seen where others have put you in your place.

MT Cranial Cavity: Maybe he can provide me with what I think is the proper documents to determine if he is really part of the 1/9.

One ninth of what? Specify. I'll tell you the same thing that I told Private Major Luke_Wyatt. Firsthand experience to firsthand experience conversation. But we have to determine what exactly it is you're talking about.

MT Cranial Cavity: Or maybe he will say none of my fucking business like a normal person would.

You don't know how a normal person would act, or what they say, without a valid study determining what a normal person is, and what that person would do.

MT Cranial Cavity: Either way you are just a spectator LL.

Actually, he's using psychology to stir you guys up to rush yourselves into the meat grinder.

MT Cranial Cavity: Maybe he can provide me with what I think is the proper documents to determine if he is really part of the 1/9.

One ninth of what? Specify. I'll tell you the same thing that I told Private Major Luke_Wyatt. Firsthand experience to firsthand experience conversation. But we have to determine what exactly it is you're talking about

I think MT brain Bucket is confused, I don't remember you saying you were part of the 1st Battalion 9th Marines in any of your post, but I may have missed it, I thought I read you are or going to be retired Army, any way carry on and Semper Fi and Thank You for your service

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

So is he Humpty, Marshal or JL?

Or is it John Cornyn?

Regardless, his verbose ass has been on ignore since before his last "flare-up."

Typical of YOU lying liberals to TRY to ignore, or put on ignore, posters that whip your sorry lying liberal asses. RUN AND HIDE, RUN AND HIDE ! Especially those lying liberals that steal valor AND those who WK for them !

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by gary5912

MT Cranial Cavity: Maybe he can provide me with what I think is the proper documents to determine if he is really part of the 1/9.

One ninth of what? Specify. I'll tell you the same thing that I told Private Major Luke_Wyatt. Firsthand experience to firsthand experience conversation. But we have to determine what exactly it is you're talking about

I think MT brain Bucket is confused, I don't remember you saying you were part of the 1st Battalion 9th Marines in any of your post, but I may have missed it, I thought I read you are or going to be retired Army, any way carry on and Semper Fi and Thank You for your service

Another example of lying liberals getting " confused " when it comes to statements regarding military service. It's only natural that they would get confused, since so many of them take the route of Slick Willy and odummer of avoiding service in the military. And like Slick Willy ( who was caught on an open mike saying so ), they " LOATHE " the military. They abhor the required discipline, requirement to be SELFLESS, and to be HONEST and honorable in their duties. They also lack the character to own up to their mistakes, preferring to blame others ( just like shrilLIARy and the DNC and the media are doing now over their loss ) for any mistakes, failures or losses that result from their actions or inactions.

[lustylad]

CRICKETS!

Damage assessment completed... enemy 100% emasculated!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Ok, that was less than 60 minutes of sustained carpet bombing of Private Major FatAss]

60 minutes of bullshit from a certified nutcase

[DSK]

Originally Posted by WTF

She would be a Godsend compared to what we have. I liked , Paul and Ohio Gov. on the GOP side.

Former Naval officer, can't remember his name...for the Dems.

Wound up voting Johnson because of the shitty candidates each side nominated.

DSK may be right, country going to chit.


.

Now you are talking my old buddy.

I was originally for Rubio.

I also liked that guy Jim Webb, until I found out Mike008 liked him.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by DSK

I also liked that guy Jim Webb, until I found out Mike008 liked him.

0zombies would NEVER! vote for someone who actually loves America, like Webb...

eehhhhbuhhrrrr changed to Kanks when he realized this...

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by DSK

Now you are talking my old buddy.

I was originally for Rubio.

I also liked that guy Jim Webb, until I found out Mike008 liked him.

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

0zombies would NEVER! vote for someone who actually loves America, like Webb...

eehhhhbuhhrrrr changed to Kanks when he realized this...

Lemmings wallowing in bull shit.
Stupid fucking lemmings.

[herfacechair]

I was going to ignore Assup Gayridden's posts as well, but this dummy is a glutton for punishment. Anybody see a trend when it comes to those I decide to no longer ignore? lustylad is a master at getting people with little to no brain activity to jump into the meat grinder.

Assup Gayridden: Mebbe sumbiddy'll teach yew to read.

I've lost count of how many times you, and the others that have destroyed in debate, demonstrated a colossal lack of ability when it comes to reading comprehension ability. You don't have a leg to stand on getting on somebody's case, who you think "can't read", when you've shown at times that you can't even understand English generated in a way that a fifth grader could understand.

Assup Gayridden: And why are YOU even talking about (forbidden subject), Farmer SLOBBRIN?

It's obvious what it is they're talking about, and why they are talking about it. If you learned how to read, with the intention of understanding what you're reading, you would not have even needed to ask that question.

Assup Gayridden: I wonder how many Greek Gods currently fat shaming poor Luke are really 400 pound assholes in their beds.

Phony retired Sergeant Major Luke_Wyatt admitted to being morbidly obese. That, by itself, would not be the reason why the others here are slamming him. What is getting others here to hammer him for his weight is his attitude, line of reasoning, and his general lack of knowledge of what he is talking about. You don't see them here fat shaming Santa Claus on this thread, do you? Well, he's not here acting like an idiot and acting like our local phony "retired Sergeant Major" is acting.

Assup Gayridden: I think your abusive bullying of this or any poster is ironic, Princess YUGE Twat!

Jumping onto this thread, and attacking her comments, telling her that she should "learn how to read", following that up by calling her names, amounts to you being abusive and being a bully. Yes, ironic indeed that the person that engages in bullying accuses others of doing what he does. Like the other retarded liberals, you're very good at deflecting your own traits onto others, and you ignore why certain posters would say the things that they are saying. You ignore why R.M. made the comments that you made, and you ignore why the others are slamming our local phony "retired Sergeant Major" Luke_Wyatt.

Assup Gayridden: girl bullies never win

Boneheads that type as if they have one brain cell trying to take them over, causing them to type as that of a retarded ghost possesses them generally don't win.

Assup Gayridden: Even old wrinkly ones who can rent our their cavernous pussies as AirBNBs...or fallout shelters.

Just like a typical regressive, you pull crap out of your arse and fling it, hoping that it would stick. You know nothing of how well she is doing, and what kind of business she's getting. There is no need for you to describe her pussy as if it was anything like your arse hole given that you are ass up gay ridden.

Assup Gayridden: No wonder the whookers whate LLephantMan!!!

Based on what? The fact that he has not left up a review? That's meaningless, as not every hobbyist leaves a review, nor did they review every session that they had. The fact that you would have to resort to a lack of reviews in his profile to attack him speaks volumes of the fact that when it comes to a straight up debate, you consistently get your arse whopped.

Assup Gayridden: If anyone would know about big pussies, it would be Princess YUGE twat.

Says the guy with a big back entrance, due to his being ass up gay ridden.

Assup Gayridden: I hear you're renting it out as an AirBNB!

Considering that your cranial cavity is empty, save for the occasional toy monkey up there banging its cymbals, you don't have a leg to stand on erroneously speculating about what somebody else is doing, simply because you don't agree with what they say.

Assup Gayridden: Better stock up on the Glade!

No amount of Glade could address the stench that radiates out of you. Heck, if someone tried to apply that to your mouth, the Glade product would go bad. I wouldn't be surprised that every time you enter the room, people initially think that someone farted, then assume that there was a garbage spill, before assuming that you're a hobo getting ready to bum people for money.

Assup Gayridden: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Don't worry, the nice young people in white lab coats will come and take you to the nice happy place.

Assup Gayridden: So is he Humpty, Marshal or JL? Or is it John Cornyn?

Whoever they are, they're lucky to not be you.

Assup Gayridden: Regardless, his verbose ass has been on ignore since before his last "flare-up."

As the others have pointed out to you, anybody with a coherent thought, who advance an actual argument demolishing your argument in showing you that you are colossally clueless, is "verbose" as far as you are concerned.

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

" I'm sorry, but you have so much bullshit radiating from you that I highly doubt that the BS that you smell is coming from elsewhere. " Yep, ole " seArgent shitburner " made sure to stand DOWN WIND when he was on the filed latrine " honey pot " burning detail ! With all of those years of shit burning behind him ( and burning shit in front of him ! ) , it's NO wonder that the providers " find excuses " ( his words ) not to see him . They can't make enough Lysol to cover THAT reeking smell !

No wonder why he "retired" from the "Army". Commercially Provided porta-Johns are available during the field training exercises and situational training exercises nowadays. His "services" are not as needed as much, and he was not good for anything else.

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by gary5912

I think MT brain Bucket is confused, I don't remember you saying you were part of the 1st Battalion 9th Marines in any of your post, but I may have missed it, I thought I read you are or going to be retired Army, any way carry on and Semper Fi and Thank You for your service

Thanks, transferring to the retired reserve and still being liable for mobilization for combat deployments. Thank you for your service as well. One of the things that our local phony "retired Sergeant Major" doesn't get is the fact that we could look at each other's posts, as well as that made by other veterans here, and tell that there is a veteran behind the username. No DD Form 214 check required.

[herfacechair]

I've been smacking this retard around for over half a decade now. This butt nugget is a masochist and enjoys the arse beatings that I give him. It also appears that he enjoys the arse beating that he gets from everybody else as well. Another dummy that couldn't resist taking a swipe at me... Causing me to change my mind about ignoring his posts.

WTF: Z and Governor Kasich of Ohio are the few same voices of reason...

They didn't represent mainstream conservatism, and would not have gained traction nationally. They would've gotten their arses handed to them in the general election.

WTF: She would be a Godsend compared to what we have.

What we have right now is a Godsend compared to what we had last, and what could've been the case. Your people in the media would have assassinated her character during the primaries had she ran. The Republicans would've gladly gotten behind her.

WTF: I liked , Paul and Ohio Gov. on the GOP side.

Paul had his head up his arse when it came to strategic matters, and the Ohio Governor did not represent mainstream Republicans. He, like the others on the Republican side, were representative of the establishment, which the conservatives did not want.

WTF: Former Naval officer, can't remember his name...for the Dems.

Doesn't surprise me that you don't know WTF you're talking about even when it comes to something that you might have a shot of knowing what you're talking about. He was an officer in the USMC, then became Secretary of the Navy. But, naval captures both Navy and Marines, right?

WTF: DSK may be right, country going to chit.

You're both wrong. A look at the campaign posters from previous elections, not just in the last two centuries, but in the 19th Century as well, showed a public that was dysfunctional and politicians that made constituents think that the country was going to hell in a handbasket.

WTF: Yes. He graduated from the Naval Academy and served as the Secretary of Navy. Marine. 68-72

Yes, after you Googled his name in an attempt to prove the opposition wrong, then coming back here and acting like this information was at the tip of your tongue... Like the BS that you spew.

WTF: 60 minutes of bullshit from a certified nutcase

You dismiss any logical, factual, and reasoned argument destroying your diatribes, assumptions, opinions, or what you would call your "arguments" as "bullshit", the way juveniles dismissed their parents' lecturing them as "bullshit". Any argument that forces you to see that you'd know WTF you're talking about is something that you consider as "bullshit".

Also, a real therapist/psychiatrist would have to meet with somebody, and interviewed them face-to-face, before they would have to dismiss somebody as a "certified" nutcase. Before, and after, I went to Iraq, I had interviews with therapists and psychiatrists. These folks were "certified" in their professions, and found me to be normal. Who should we believe? An idiot behind the keyboard that has never met me, who doesn't know WTF he's talking about, or a certified professional that has met me?

You know that you do not have an argument, and you don't have a clue about WTF you're talking about, when your main response is that the opposition is a "certified nutcase".

[herfacechair]

From another thread:

Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

You know I wish for one day I would resort back to my younger MOB days - I seen many grown men cry like little babies - it would be no different with you ass clowns

By implying that he had "younger MOB days", he's implying that he had "older MOB days". This is short for "mobilization", a term used by the reserve components. Based on this statement, Private Luke_Wyatt is claiming an Army National Guard, Army Reserve, or State Defense Force background. Since his profile has him in Texas, he could be claiming to be from the Texas Army National Guard, the Army Reserve, or Texas State Guard. The same concept applies, short stint with "ho hum" service if he did serve.

Also, it's a good thing that I generate my replies on MS Word, and save them, before posting them here. From an argument with a turd that went by "bigtext":

"bigtext: 4) They have each chosen to lecture the world from a user friendly pulpit on a hooker board!"

"Private Major Luke_Wyatt: and some how you think you are the stolen valor enforcer of the whore boards."

Hmmmm, I wonder... Still waiting for both to answer my questions...