Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1
This current court, who knows. But to kind of answer the question, I’m not sure this is a free speech issue and even were that the approach, Speech can be limited when it’s illegal.
Can you give us some examples of free speech that is illegal so we can compare it to what the new law says?
The implementation of the law will be what’s interesting. I’ve not seen the language so I’m not clear what they deem illegal.
Will they make searching illegal. That’s clearly not speech so they might be able to make that an illegal activity, though it’s be very big brother-ish. Or will they attempt to make a Michigan website illegal that’s accessible in Carolina? I don’t see practically how that works such that a Carolina DA could charge the Michigan site administration.
I’m Actually curious to see how the lower courts in Carolina handle it as well was what they actually deem as illegal.
What’s more interesting to me is that Carolina has passed this legislation. Every time HF and others say, no one is gonna take these things further, the right gives it their best shot to go full Taliban
|
And the courts stop them which is why I don't lose any sleep over "wondering what the courts will do".
I imagine the very first court that hears this will put this law on hold all the way to the SC which will find it un-Consitutional.
