The Mueller report concludes it was not needed

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

all wrong, Bub. we've been over this before.

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=106...&postcount=134


"On March 4, just after the New York Times broke the news about Clinton’s email practices at the State Department, John Podesta (a top Obama adviser and Clinton’s campaign chairman) emailed Cheryl Mills (Clinton’s confidant and top aide in the Obama State Department) to suggest that Clinton’s “emails to and from potus” should be “held” — i.e., not disclosed — because “that’s the heart of his exec privilege.” At the time, the House committee investigating the Benghazi jihadist attack was pressing for production of Clinton’s emails."


Thank you valued poster!

Really...you still on Mrs Clinton's emails? Talk about beating a dead horse! I think y'all are in denial and afflicted with a severe case of cognitive dissonance. No key appointees of the Obama administration has been convicted for any reason to date. The same cannot be said of the Trump administration.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Really...you still on Mrs Clinton's emails? Talk about beating a dead horse! I think y'all are in denial and afflicted with a severe case of cognitive dissonance. No key appointees of the Obama administration has been convicted for any reason to date. The same cannot be said of the Trump administration.

David Petreaus

James Cartwright...

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

David Petreaus

James Cartwright...

holder impeached!

[rexdutchman]

Good read ( "Political Thuggery) is my new word of the day

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

I think y'all are in denial and afflicted with a severe case of cognitive dissonance. No key appointees of the Obama administration has been convicted for any reason to date. The same cannot be said of the Trump administration.

Those indictments will be coming soon enough. The only person that was a part of the Trump “administration” indicted is Flynn. Let’s see how that ends.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bambino

Those indictments will be coming soon enough. The only person that was a part of the Trump “administration” indicted is Flynn. Let’s see how that ends.

Yep!

And since the left intends to slander with seven degrees of separation, let's not forget that Odumbo's Illinois associate, Rod Blagojevich, is still in prison, and Anthony Weiner, who was caught with hildebeest's email, is still in a half-way house. Plus, Holder was held in contempt by Congress.

[nevergaveitathought]

when the fbi and doj is rampant with political corruption and protectionism and cronyism

nothing after that is a fair comparison

[bambino]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yep!

And since the left intends to slander with seven degrees of separation, let's not forget that Odumbo's Illinois associate, Rod Blagojevich, is still in prison, and Anthony Weiner, who was caught with hildebeest's email, is still in a half-way house. Plus, Holder was held in contempt by Congress.

And then there’s this:

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/04/11/...osecutors.html

I guess Whisky_Dic forgot got about him.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by bambino

Those indictments will be coming soon enough. The only person that was a part of the Trump “administration” indicted is Flynn. Let’s see how that ends.

Originally Posted by bambino

And then there’s this:

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/04/11/...osecutors.html

I guess Whisky_Dic forgot got about him.

Whisky's not the sharpest crayon in the box. He thinks Flynn, a career intelligence officer, was indicted for meeting foreign ambassadors without having an intelligence officer in the room.

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

David Petreaus

James Cartwright...

Touché! The second time the old man took one for the team. The first was in the early 90s and probably shot center mass in the chest by one of your ilk.

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Whisky's not the sharpest crayon in the box. He thinks Flynn, a career intelligence officer, was indicted for meeting foreign ambassadors without having an intelligence officer in the room.

Your words not mind. Gen Flynn was inappropriately working for a foreign government. He should have known better since as you say... He was a career intelligence officer. The requirements to work for a foreign government as a registered agent (not the same as intelligence agent) is common knowledge. Moreover, you are confused. It was 45 who aledgely met alone with a known Russian spymaster in the White House against long established protocols. LMAO. So tell us.....since YOU brought it up..... Which crayon aka crayola is your favorite flavor?

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by bambino

And then there’s this:

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/04/11/...osecutors.html

I guess Whisky_Dic forgot got about him.

You know what I did forget. No worries though. 45s administration still holds the winning record of most criminal convictions by a Presidental administration by a wide margin. Are y'all tired of winning yet?

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by bambino

Those indictments will be coming soon enough. The only person that was a part of the Trump “administration” indicted is Flynn. Let’s see how that ends.

I consider members of the Trump campaign as part of his administration since he was the winning Republican front runner who became President.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

I consider members of the Trump campaign as part of his administration since he was the winning Republican front runner who became President.

Did you also consider then anyone tied to Obama's campaign or potential appointments that never actually entered the administration as officials also included in the mix? Hell you cast a wide net when it comes to Trump. The same never seems to apply otherwise.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Your words not mind (sic)... Moreover, you are confused...

Here is exactly what you posted:

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

...transition meetings with foreign officials are not conducted in secret and a representative from the intelligence community is usually present.

I don't know where you come up with this nonsense. Flynn did not conduct transition meetings "in secret" and there is no requirement for "a representative of the intelligence community" to be present at such meetings. As an experienced former intelligence officer, Flynn knew his transition meetings were being surveilled. He was not indicted for having such meetings or for conducting them "in secret" or for failing to have another intel officer with him. He was alleged to have lied to the FBI about what was discussed. You're the one who is confused.