Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
J666 - Come on down with impeachment.
No chance of conviction - the DPST's believe an "Impeachmint" - speling deliberate - will accomplish removing Trump from office
No chance of removal at a Senate trial.
Backlashwill cost the DPST
s dearly - so go ahead and have Looney Schiff/nadler send up the Articles of Impeachmint for DPST's to suck on.
Well actually it won’t result in removal. I don’t think anybody expects Moscow Mitch to allow it on the Senate floor.
But it will require Trump and his crime family to testify and release documentation relating to his questionable dealings.
Well actually it won’t result in removal. I don’t think anybody expects Moscow Mitch to allow it on the Senate floor.
You reveal your ignorance of basic American civics even in your wildest speculations. If the House votes to impeach, there is no way the Senate can fail to hold a vote to convict or not convict based on the House's charges. No Senate majority leader can block it. A 2/3 super-majority is needed to convict.
Just to remind everyone - yssup is the same guy who once complained about US Senate seats being "gerrymandered"! I kid you not!
Just to remind everyone - yssup is the same guy who once complained about US Senate seats being "gerrymandered"! I kid you not!
the fact there is a separate chamber with each state, regardless of population, having equal representation, is a gerrymander of sorts to the left
the whole senate, separate states, electoral college etc is one big gerrymander to the left
so that could have been his feelings on the issue
something like a select standing committee of a National Peoples Congress might suit the left
with only the standing committee making the nation's rules
and the other thousand or so members of a national congress having just the trappings of purpose and meeting only two weeks or so in the year for a sort of convivial backslapping and convention - all within the boundaries of acceptability, as it were
J666 - Come on down with impeachment.
No chance of conviction - the DPST's believe an "Impeachmint" - speling deliberate - will accomplish removing Trump from office
No chance of removal at a Senate trial.
Backlashwill cost the DPST
s dearly - so go ahead and have Looney Schiff/nadler send up the Articles of Impeachmint for DPST's to suck on.
,
No removal? Articles haven’t been written yet, how would you know?
Moscow Mitch can’t save Putin’s pissboy. The Chief Justice oversees the trial and every Senator has to vote. The confederates of the Freedom caucus and other Russian sympathizers will have to go on record as trump party enablers.
the fact there is a separate chamber with each state, regardless of population, having equal representation, is a gerrymander of sorts to the left
the whole senate, separate states, electoral college etc is one big gerrymander to the left
so that could have been his feelings on the issue
Yes I know what you're driving at, but yssup didn't understand those arguments and never used them to acquit himself or say "this is what I meant" when he was ridiculed for saying the Senate can be gerrymandered.
Another example of how you and I can argue their side better than the libs on this board. Sad!
CREW is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization composed of a small but nimble group of lawyers, researchers, and communicators.
Somehow, I don't see where they are influencing much in terms of an impeachment inquiry.
Small but nimble group of lawyers that I had never heard of before. But hey, I'm wondering if Slick Willy is somehow or somewhere behind the scenes of this group. Almost all of their job openings right now are for "interns"
The Constitution vests Congress with the exclusive power and solemn responsibility of holding a president accountable while he is in office. As Special Counsel Mueller recently explained, Department of Justice policy states that “the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.” That process is impeachment. Article I of our Constitution vests the House of Representatives with the power to accuse a president of committing “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” and the Senate with the power to try all impeachments and convict if it deems a president’s removal from office both merited and wise. The term “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” refers to serious abuses of official power (Sunstein at 36-37). As Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist 65, impeachment proceedings are reserved for “offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.”
The Constitution vests Congress with the exclusive power and solemn responsibility of holding a president accountable while he is in office. As Special Counsel Mueller recently explained, Department of Justice policy states that “the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.” That process is impeachment. Article I of our Constitution vests the House of Representatives with the power to accuse a president of committing “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” and the Senate with the power to try all impeachments and convict if it deems a president’s removal from office both merited and wise. The term “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” refers to serious abuses of official power (Sunstein at 36-37). As Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist 65, impeachment proceedings are reserved for “offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.”
And Mueller didn't bring forth any conclusive evidence that the Congress should or would act upon.
