Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing escort review website. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of the fastest growing escort review community. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out service providers or a new provider on the site looking to take advantage of our many advertising opportunities. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > Member Suggestions and Forum Requests
Currently Active Users: 9695 (4193 members & 5492 guests)
Member Suggestions and Forum Requests This site is being designed around our membership. Please share your feedback and give suggestions. Use this section to request new forums or changes/updates as well. (For staff assistance, contact your local moderator, or see the "Emails to the Staff" post in the Questions for the Staff forum in each city)


New ShowCases
Escort Design
Rabbit's Cams
Lilly
Eros® Girls

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-09-2016, 09:18 PM   #1
AspireRain
Verified Provider
 
User ID: 368645
Join Date: Oct 5, 2016
Location: Lincoln Ne
My Showcase
Posts: 62
My ECCIE Reviews
Default Reviews On Hobbyists

Was wondering if there is any possibility us providers could have a review form for the Hobbyists for after we've have seen them? I feel it would be beneficial in many ways
** Could potentially be another safe way to verify a hobbyist
** Could give Intel on some rude or disrespectful Hobbyists providers should steer clear of
** Let providers have A Little Ease Knowing Hobbyist Is legit seeing reviews done by Verified Providers
**** In General In Believe This Could Help Providers Have A Little More Peace Of Mind About Weather They Are Legit Or Not It Has Many Aspects which potentially helps providers stay safe and unharmed or in trouble??
~~
Thanks
Se'Arra
AspireRain is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 05:01 AM   #2
SinlyCin
Verified
 
SinlyCin's Avatar
 
User ID: 370914
Join Date: Oct 22, 2016
Location: Corpus Christi
My Showcase
Posts: 58
My ECCIE Reviews
Exclamation By all means that would be a real game changer around here

For some reason I had the impression we already had a section like that. Butt now would be the time to add a mongers review section for us. Of course we can always find a different way to communicate, as a network should anyway. Especially because the site is designed for a safe and happy hobby,on BOTH sides!
What to do???
SinlyCin is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 08:51 AM   #3
200K
Valued Poster
 
200K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 690
Reviews: 11
Default

There is a Powder Room section for the ladies.
Just start a thread in there with all the guy's eccie names. I'm sure it'll fill up fast.
__________________
***Membership has its privileges***
Flash a trucker today! Make him smile!
200K is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 10:03 AM   #4
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 7,717
Reviews: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AspireRain View Post
Was wondering if there is any possibility us providers could have a review form for the Hobbyists for after we've have seen them? I feel it would be beneficial in many ways
** Could potentially be another safe way to verify a hobbyist
** Could give Intel on some rude or disrespectful Hobbyists providers should steer clear of
** Let providers have A Little Ease Knowing Hobbyist Is legit seeing reviews done by Verified Providers
**** In General In Believe This Could Help Providers Have A Little More Peace Of Mind About Weather They Are Legit Or Not It Has Many Aspects which potentially helps providers stay safe and unharmed or in trouble??
~~
Thanks
Se'Arra
The concept comes up every few months. While it sounds reasonable and equitable, there are too many guys with fragile egos to ever see it implemented here.

Wait a little while and all the typical arguments will come out, and you may well be attacked for "not understanding the rules".

But it is a good suggestion anyway.
__________________
I have had the great good fortune of meeting many wonderful ladies. A few stand out as especially dear to me. TaylorofDC, Sedona, Jamielee Perdue, Maria of AHDC, Snow White, Taylor Fox, and Jaycee Rivers. Thank you for brightening my world.
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 10:05 AM   #5
Jabr
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jun 4, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 99
Reviews: 21
Default

I'd be good with it. It's another way to get verified. Another less detailed option I've seen is where an escort can write "white list" referrals. No details, it basically says she vouches for the client. If you have questions, I guess you could always PM the escort who wrote the referral.
Jabr is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 10:27 AM   #6
chicagoboy
Ribbed, For Her Pleasure
 
chicagoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,524
Default

Dumb ideas never die.
__________________
If God didn't want them sheared, He would not have made them sheep. ~ Calvera (The Magnificent Seven)

À chacun son goat. ~ TCGF ♥ ♦ When life hands you lemmings, make lemmingade.

Ever noticed Courtesan can be re-arranged to spell A Sore Cunt, and Courtesans to spell A Sour Scent?

Irony is being called "probably the nastiest SOB" by Raphy, and a "poor pathetic loser" by Grumps.

#GrammarPoliceLivesMatter #LincksDammitLincks!
chicagoboy is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 11:37 AM   #7
EastTexasGrown
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jul 31, 2015
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,163
Reviews: 37
Default

I don't have a problem with it but also believe it will never happen as an actual form version like we have to review Playmates on our side.

With that being said, I don't know much about the Powder Room but if it is set up like our side and it has a search function, why not start a thread by the Hobbiest Name. Only put his handle name and nothing else in the title. Then you can say what you want in the body of the thread.

There could be rules like we have on our side like "Do not bump a thread over 30 days old". I see Playmate A. She then starts a thread on me in the Powder Room. I see Playmate B a few days later. She could add to the thread started by Playmate A or she could start her own thread on me. A month later, when I am asking to see Playmate C, she could search my handle and all threads in the Powder Room that contain my name will pop up for her viewing. Based upon what is said about me, she is then able to make a decision or even reach out to some Playmates who have seen me to get further clarification.

Not all guys participate in the review process on our side so I am sure not all Playmates would participate on your side as well. But the more who do participate, the better the results.

Now I do not know anything about the Powder Room. This might already be in place?

This is not an OWNERSHIP type transaction between them and us. Just because I spend X amount of $ for an hour does not mean I own them for an hour. This is suppose to be a mutually beneficial transaction. Just because I spend $100 at a department store or restaurant doesn't mean I get to behave the way I want. There are still guidelines on god customer etiquette that iust follow. If i do not, then those places might not want me back. I have no problem in the ladies communicating about what type of customer I am. The better that communication ... the better they know how to take care of my customer needs.
EastTexasGrown is online now   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 11:38 AM   #8
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 10,266
Reviews: 23
Default

Sure, the hobbyists should charge too.
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 12:23 PM   #9
cowboy8055
Premium Access
 
cowboy8055's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 10, 2011
Location: Rochester
Posts: 5,013
Reviews: 43
Default

I don't have a problem with it. Seems a good way to verify guys. Having to get references is getting annoying.

Probably won't happen though. Too many frail egos.
cowboy8055 is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 02:08 PM   #10
rcinokc
Premium Access
 
rcinokc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 26, 2010
Location: OKC
Posts: 2,183
Reviews: 60
Default

I believe the board owner has said no to this more than once.
__________________
"It's about the attitude" Miguel Angel Jimenez
rcinokc is offline   Quote
Old 12-10-2016, 07:54 PM   #11
ugotme10
Super Moderator
 
ugotme10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 16, 2010
Location: Inside beautiful women.
Posts: 3,495
Reviews: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T View Post
The concept comes up every few months. While it sounds reasonable and equitable, there are too many guys with fragile egos to ever see it implemented here.

Wait a little while and all the typical arguments will come out, and you may well be attacked for "not understanding the rules".

But it is a good suggestion anyway.

Old-T is right. With all the fragile male egos, your likely to lose a client or a potential client if you say anything that rubs him the wrong way, and it won't matter how many orgasms you fake if he's thinking about what you honestly said of him.
I know some ladies have read comments in reviews and decided they would not see a particular client for that reason.
Especially if he says she's portly, or has cottage cheese thighs.
__________________
Verified Protein Provider & Womb Raider
While doing DATY, even non-believers cry out to the ALMIGHTY

”Wow!!!!” - Rachelina
"My legs are jelly, you wore me out..." - Ms Francesca
"I had a blast---you are so awesome babe!!" - Dallas Rain
Darling, you are ABSOLUTELY MAGNIFICENT - Love EveParadise XOXOXOXO

ugotme10 is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 11:12 AM   #12
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 10,266
Reviews: 23
Default

I can't see a good reason for it. Hobbyists aren't marketing themselves. Could it benefit providers? Probably not. Those reviews would probably less reliable than hobbyists reviews of providers. Providers have ways to verify hobbyists. The smart ones do anyway.
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2016, 09:00 PM   #13
RedneckV8
Registered Member
 
RedneckV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 27, 2016
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 5
Reviews: 1
Default

I actually love the idea. I'd like to know what they think about me just as much as I'm sure they like to know what what we think about them.
__________________
Racing. Because baseball, basketball and football only require one ball.
RedneckV8 is offline   Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 08:07 AM   #14
ChloeClark
Perfect Paramour
 
ChloeClark's Avatar
 
User ID: 347996
Join Date: May 9, 2016
Location: Houston
My Showcase
Posts: 357
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

What goes on in the powder room never stays in the powder room. Please! This board is full of leaks... We all know that.
__________________
832.829.6886
ChloeUpClose.com
ChloeClark is offline   Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 12:20 PM   #15
cowboy8055
Premium Access
 
cowboy8055's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 10, 2011
Location: Rochester
Posts: 5,013
Reviews: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
I can't see a good reason for it. Hobbyists aren't marketing themselves. Could it benefit providers? Probably not. Those reviews would probably less reliable than hobbyists reviews of providers. Providers have ways to verify hobbyists. The smart ones do anyway.
It would just make verifying guys easier. If a guy gets reviewed other gals can see it. It could reduce the need for references and screening. Probably a moot point since it's not going to happen. Even if it did I have a feeling most gals wouldn't do it anyways.
cowboy8055 is offline   Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Preferred411
Top Posters
DallasRain53291
pyramider40133
gman4436527
Yssup Rider34163
Still Looking33814
LexusLover31773
Chica Chaser31050
Mokoa30652
Mojojo29223
offshoredrilling28950
i'va biggen28773
CuteOldGuy28721
WTF27139
dearhunter25067
Wakeup23644
Top Reviewers
Still Looking 398
MoneyManMatt 389
cockalatte 325
Jon Bon 296
Harley Diablo 270
nicemusic 246
Russ Tworthy 244
silverstate53 232
mriley000 221
dominos 206
Hawkeye9 204
janan 777 202
Cityjazz 200
professoreccie 192
samcruz 187

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved