Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Yet Sondland can just pick up the phone and call him. Does the president take calls from just anyone?
Trump selected Sondland as ambassador on March 12, 2018. Sondland had donated something like $1 million to Trump. So does Trump hand out ambassadorships to people he doesn't know very well? I would hope not.
My guess is Sondland will not be an ambassador very much longer.
This is your response after you "thought" about it?
Projection is the fallback position of the trumpys.
When are they going to stick with a defense of trump?
They change it after each witness. Which is really funny because they've heard it before when the testimony was first given.
Looks like they don't like to read either.
Don't like hearing the truth? Review the history of the modern democratic party. They accuse someone of cheating on their marriage while holding Bill Clinton and John Edwards close. They accuse someone of draft dodging (who didn't) but have butt boys like Clinton and Blumenfeld as standard bearers. They accuse people of being at war with women but call Clinton (Hillary) and Ted Kennedy as examples of femininity. I could go into race, religion, and patriotism but you know I'm right.
I did not have sex with that woman- slick willie
I invented the internet - al loserman
Now who is the party of liars??
Shall we discuss the hillary emails that "went missing"?
When you’re asking that question, the answer is plural. It’s parties of liars. And as long as one half of Americans dumbly side with one party and the other half dumbly sides with the other, all the pieces of shit politicians can run amuck and fuck this country into the ground with no recourse. Not an original thought here, but has anyone here ever heard “divide and conquer”?
I know you don't check your info before you start your spin.
The body of the article contains numerous lies that pertain to what's going on now. Instead of refuting any of them or challenging them you embrace them and leap into "what-about-ism".
Maybe if you didn't start with 25 yo half-truths you wouldn't seem so you.
The truth doesn't bother me. Your stupid version does.
I know Clinton and Edwards both cheated and apologized for their behavior. Let me know who doesn't know that.
Now let's talk about trump.
No matter what bullshit comes out of your mouth, having trump as your standard-bearer shows how lacking you are. Plus look how ironic this situation is.
A standard-bearer with no standards.
You have done everything but deify trump. Both of us, as well as most, know he doesn't admit or apologize for virtually anything he does.
And you accept him without requiring any of the characteristics that Americans aspire to (and admittedly not all have achieved what they wanted to or could have),
You have put your faith in the hands of a scumbag. Your standards are the same as his but yours are harmless.
Because you are nobody. But somebody with all of your faults, multiplied by his office, is trying to impose his childlike will upon us.
He'll be impeached and the senate will get to explain why they left him in office and violated their oaths.
The name of the article is "The Party of Lying Liars". Just as I can't say what the author's parameters are, I don't accept responsibility for the choice of the title either.
To quote one of your major douche-bags (who has been implicated by recent testimony), "Get over it."
All I've seen from you is your what-aboutism and a lack of challenge or rebuttal for any of the contents.
Deflect/divert away chumlee.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Don't like hearing the truth? Review the history of the modern democratic party. They accuse someone of cheating on their marriage while holding Bill Clinton and John Edwards close. They accuse someone of draft dodging (who didn't) but have butt boys like Clinton and Blumenfeld as standard bearers. They accuse people of being at war with women but call Clinton (Hillary) and Ted Kennedy as examples of femininity. I could go into race, religion, and patriotism but you know I'm right.
You knew it was "nosense"?
I only had to read who posted this bullshit to know it would have little to nothing to do with the thread.
You "know", because of the source, the info contained in the article is "nosense".
And then using the solid foundation of your ignorance as proof, you shit out a bunch of off-topic nonsense.
Because you hate to read, you can't address anything in the article.
You believe trump but not the WaPo. So it looks like if the WaPo reports trumps has been (after he actually has been impeached) impeached, you won't believe it.
Good thing you mean nothing in the larger picture.
You the genius..."lying liars"
Liars...what does the word denote...you crying crier...TDS has eaten your brain up...what little you have MUNCHY
Give your balls a tug, titfucker. Your commentary(like your mum) is like a box of Timbits. Full of holes you can share with everybody!
You had me on ignore with your other handle.
As I said to you...do they have multi-handle ignore function ASSUP.
You were banned for a reason you little prick!!
