Leaks from the intelligence community

[wordup666]

The only way to stop leaks is gaining their trust and loyalty.

Leon Panetta

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by wordup666

The only way to stop leaks is gaining their trust and loyalty.

Leon Panetta

Panetta always seemed to be a reasonable sort of guy in his demeanor, but he didn't seem to think outside the "box" in which he found himself. You stop intelligent leaks by prosecuting the leakers and giving them a sufficient prison sentence to deter others from believing it was ok to leak intelligence.

Isn't that what the Obaminable Administration wanted to do with Snowden?

And who was that General ... oh, yea, Patraeus.

[StandinStraight]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Panetta always seemed to be a reasonable sort of guy in his demeanor, but he didn't seem to think outside the "box" in which he found himself. You stop intelligent leaks by prosecuting the leakers and giving them a sufficient prison sentence to deter others from believing it was ok to leak intelligence.

Isn't that what the Obaminable Administration wanted to do with Snowden?

And who was that General ... oh, yea, Patraeus.

We don't know if the intelligence agencies are the source of the leaks, also nothing that has been leaked was illegal to leak anyway so nobody would ever be prosecuted. The White House itself or the house or senate may be the source of the leaks. Leaks are occurring because whoever is leaking realizes the danger of Donald Trump. If your finding information that point to your president being a Russian asset, you have to leak it, if you passed it to him he would squelch it.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

We don't know if the intelligence agencies are the source of the leaks, also nothing that has been leaked was illegal to leak anyway so nobody would ever be prosecuted. The White House itself or the house or senate may be the source of the leaks. Leaks are occurring because whoever is leaking realizes the danger of Donald Trump. If your finding information that point to your president being a Russian asset, you have to leak it, if you passed it to him he would squelch it.

Your stupid-ass is lying again, Stan-the-Stupid. The leak revealing that Flynn had a conversation with a Russian ambassador was a major security breach, Stan-the-Stupid. U.S. surveillance of foreign dignitaries is classified intel, Stan-the-Stupid. Trump's telephone conversations with foreign heads of state are also classified, Stan-the-Stupid. Your buddies releasing this info deserve time in prison for breaching security protocols and violating U.S. laws, Stan-the-Stupid.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

We don't know ....

Why do you keep posting "we"? You pretend like there is a whole bunch of people thinking like you so you can portray your "thinking" is widely accepted.

Let's see:

You (not "we") don't know that a leak of "intelligence" came from an "intelligence" agency? But you "do know" that the Russian intelligence agency hacked into the DNC computers for Putin and Putin used the ACTUAL EMAILS REVEALING THE DNC's PLOT TO WIN to expose the Democrats for what they REALLY ARE and thereby helped Trump win the election by disclosing the TRUTH!

If you're teaching "political science" you should be fired!

[wordup666]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Panetta always seemed to be a reasonable sort of guy in his demeanor, but he didn't seem to think outside the "box" in which he found himself. You stop intelligent leaks by prosecuting the leakers and giving them a sufficient prison sentence to deter others from believing it was ok to leak intelligence.

Isn't that what the Obaminable Administration wanted to do with Snowden?

And who was that General ... oh, yea, Patraeus.

Chelsea Manning.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by wordup666

Chelsea Manning.

She's FREE NOW, you can get you some of that BROWN ROUND, you want so much... eehhhhbuhrrrrr

[LexusLover]

Just in time to not be able to use the ladies room!

[Guest123018-4]

I thinck "she" learned how fudge was packed while in the joint.
Maybe "she" will get a job at the fudge factory.

[StandinStraight]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Why do you keep posting "we"? You pretend like there is a whole bunch of people thinking like you so you can portray your "thinking" is widely accepted.

Let's see:

You (not "we") don't know that a leak of "intelligence" came from an "intelligence" agency? But you "do know" that the Russian intelligence agency hacked into the DNC computers for Putin and Putin used the ACTUAL EMAILS REVEALING THE DNC's PLOT TO WIN to expose the Democrats for what they REALLY ARE and thereby helped Trump win the election by disclosing the TRUTH!

If you're teaching "political science" you should be fired!

Lexus you question shows your true colors. Why do I say "we" you ask, liberals care for everyone and realize that it takes a village, conservatives think only of themselves and don't understand the "we" concept. Liberals would say "we the people" conservatives would say "I the individual", it is why conservatives tend to be selfish and so angry, they look at everything like it is theirs only and everyone is trying to take it away. So Sad! I hope this helps you in some way to cope with your conservativeness.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

Lexus you question shows your true colors.

Yes, "professor"! VVVVVVV

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

Lexus you question shows your true colors. Why do I say "we" you ask, liberals care for everyone and realize that it takes a village, conservatives think only of themselves and don't understand the "we" concept. Liberals would say "we the people" conservatives would say "I the individual", it is why conservatives tend to be selfish and so angry, they look at everything like it is theirs only and everyone is trying to take it away. So Sad! I hope this helps you in some way to cope with your conservativeness.

Your lying-ass is being stupid again, Stan-the-Stupid. When you socialist lib-retards use the word "we" you're advocating collectivization, per Mao, etc., in order to steal what you want, Stan-the-Stupid. Mao didn't suffer from "want", Stan-the-Stupid, but 45 million Chinese starved to death so that Mao could "share" their food with those he believed to be more deserving, Stan-the-Stupid.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

When you socialist lib-retards use the word "we" you're advocating collectivization, ....

IMO the simple explanation is their overwhelming insecurity (it also drives them to spuriously claim "professorships" and "valor") that compels them to seek a "collective" self in their sentence so they appear to be in the "majority" or "dominant" group for their opinions and "statements of (THEIR) facts." Because THEY ARE INSECURE they perceive that others must be even more insecure, so they "believe" the others will back down and retreat against the "overwhelming odds" purportedly against them!

An unfortunate violation of several "rules" of engagement, but the most damning is judging others by their own standards mixed with an underestimation of their opposition.

Which BTW is the main reason Trump won!

And they are still pounding their heads against the walls.

[00 gauge]

The four most stupid words ever uttered by any woman since time began: "it takes a village" .....

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by wordup666

The only way to stop leaks is gaining their trust and loyalty.

Leon Panetta

I was in the navy and you did your fucking job because you were a professional. Not because the new captain earned your trust and loyalty. Leon the Peon doesn't know shit. Prosesute the leakers and take away their retirement and freedom. I think the GOP should go back and repeal some last minute Clinton laws that gave protections to government workers in the event another party took over the White House. Also repeal those last minute, one foot out the door, Obama laws that allowed intelligence agencies to swap gossip with each other.