Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 266
sharkman29 253
George Spelvin 250
Top Posters
DallasRain70448
biomed160810
Yssup Rider60170
gman4452966
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47657
pyramider46370
bambino40397
CryptKicker37102
Mokoa36487
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35543
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-20-2019, 09:45 AM   #1
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default Putin: We'll target USA if Washington deploys missiles in Europe

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...lUK?li=BBnb7Kz
MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia will respond to any U.S. deployment of short or intermediate-range nuclear weapons in Europe by targeting not only the countries where they are stationed, but the United States itself, President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday.

In his toughest remarks yet on a potential new arms race, Putin said Russia was not seeking confrontation and would not take the first step to deploy missiles in response to Washington's decision this month to quit a landmark Cold War-era arms control treaty.
But he said that Russia's reaction to any deployment would be resolute and that U.S. policy-makers, some of whom he said were obsessed with U.S. exceptionalism, should calculate the risks before taking any steps.
"It's their right to think how they want. But can they count? I'm sure they can. Let them count the speed and the range of the weapons systems we are developing," Putin told Russia's political elite to strong applause.
"Russia will be forced to create and deploy types of weapons which can be used not only in respect of those territories from which the direct threat to us originates, but also in respect of those territories where the centers of decision-making are located,” he said.
MISSILES IN EUROPE
Alleging Russian violations, Washington said this month it was suspending its obligations under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) and starting the process of quitting it, untying its hands to develop new missiles.
The pact banned either side from stationing short and intermediate-range, land-based missiles in Europe and its demise raises the prospect of a new arms race between Washington and Moscow, which denies flouting the treaty.
Russia denies violating the treaty. Putin responded to the U.S. move by saying Russia would mirror the U.S. moves by suspending its own obligations and quitting the pact.
But Putin, who has sometimes used bellicose rhetoric to talk up Russia's standoff with the West and to rally Russians round the flag, did not up the ante.
He did not announce new missile deployments, said money for new systems must come from existing budget funds and declared that Moscow would not deploy new land-based missiles in Europe or elsewhere unless Washington did so first.
On Wednesday, he made clear however that he was ready, reluctantly, to escalate if the United States escalated and that Russia was continuing to actively develop weapons and missile systems to ensure it was well prepared for such an eventuality.
He said any U.S. move to place new missiles in Europe would leave Moscow with no choice but to respond because it would drastically cut the time it took U.S. missiles to reach Russia, something that would pose a direct threat.
He said Russia wanted good ties with the United States, but was ready with its defensive response if necessary.
“We know how to do this and we will implement these plans immediately, as soon as the corresponding threats to us become a reality.”


Does Putin forget both sides have nuclear "Boomer" submarines with multi-warhead missiles targeted on all major cities in each country?
He knows - He is KGB and using the media.

Just as he skillfully annexed Crimea.


Ok - DPST's - come defend Your Putin Idol!!!!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 09:52 AM   #2
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,793
Encounters: 15
Default

I assumed that Russia has nuclear missiles pointed at quite a few American Cities already.

I also assume we have nuclear missles pointed at major Russian cities.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 12:23 PM   #3
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

I assume it stupid as fuck to get into another arms race unless your base loves the vast industrial military complex.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 12:29 PM   #4
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,170
Encounters: 67
Default

Who’s gonna be the one to ramp this up? Putin? Trump? Maybe Bolton.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 02:11 PM   #5
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
I assumed that Russia has nuclear missiles pointed at quite a few American Cities already.

I also assume we have nuclear missles pointed at major Russian cities.
I'm not a big nuclear war fan but...

was watching some documentaries about Russian missiles and their space program. They had many more rocket mishaps than they admit. Even after they admitted them several times.

Based on their submarine and airplane production and maintenance track records I don't think qualifies as sabre rattling.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 02:18 PM   #6
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Russian technology often has been flawed in development.

Once they get things right - like the T-34 tank or Soyuz system - they tend to make very sturdy, reliable technology.

The West and its' intelligence agencies have often over-estimated Russian achievement.

Putin is a cagy player- and KGB - I would not trust him to do anything not in his best interest (including Russia)
No one wants nuclear war - and a new Cold War with expenditures in the billions - neither side needs.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 05:59 PM   #7
bb1961
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 7,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Who’s gonna be the one to ramp this up? Putin? Trump? Maybe Bolton.
Aren't Putin and Trump tight buds??
bb1961 is online now   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 06:27 PM   #8
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11 View Post
Russian technology often has been flawed in development.

Once they get things right - like the T-34 tank or Soyuz system - they tend to make very sturdy, reliable technology.

The West and its' intelligence agencies have often over-estimated Russian achievement.

Putin is a cagy player- and KGB - I would not trust him to do anything not in his best interest (including Russia)
No one wants nuclear war - and a new Cold War with expenditures in the billions - neither side needs.
Why doesn't Trump just ask Putin? When Trump asked Putin if he interfered in the election Putin said no. Even though 17 US intelligence agencies said they did, Trump said he believed Vlad. Its a shame you don't back up the USA oeb11.
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 06:38 PM   #9
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Support our country - Sounds like the constructionist wants a cold war and Government contracts to fill his pockets!
Like Adam Schiff's evidence - show me that another cold war is good for anyone in the world- except the military-inductrial complex Eisenhower warned against.

Amazing the lack of thought process seen in these threads.
Thank you YR/TM/SC
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 06:44 PM   #10
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,397
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Who’s gonna be the one to ramp this up? Putin? Trump? Maybe Bolton.
But but but I thought Trump and Putin were pals??????
bambino is online now   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 09:58 PM   #11
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bb1961 View Post
Aren't Putin and Trump tight buds??
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
But but but I thought Trump and Putin were pals??????
Remember the panick the Progressives expressed that Trump was going to start a nuclear war with Russia the first couple of months in office.



It's even worse than how the Dems portrayed W as a stupid klutz then in the same breath anointed genius attributes to him.



good times...
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 02-20-2019, 10:44 PM   #12
dilbert firestorm
Premium Access
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

if anyone deserves any blame regarding those mid-range missiles, blame falls on China!
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 02-21-2019, 07:25 AM   #13
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

Yeah--- 60s here we come again,,,, (MIC) at it
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved