Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 370
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 262
sharkman29 250
George Spelvin 243
Top Posters
DallasRain70365
biomed160186
Yssup Rider59821
gman4452823
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47410
pyramider46370
bambino40247
CryptKicker37052
Mokoa36482
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35112
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2018, 02:26 PM   #16
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrod511 View Post
Really

there is one flaw with what your meme says this is only the mid-terms in Nov. not a presidential election

oops
what difference does it make? this election coming up has enormous implications for the future direction of the Country, as does this Court Nominee.

besides, the Constitution doesn't say anything about stalling during Presidential election years.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 02:48 PM   #17
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
what difference does it make? this election coming up has enormous implications for the future direction of the Country, as does this Court Nominee.

besides, the Constitution doesn't say anything about stalling during Presidential election years.
The Constitution does specify that it's the Senate's business to confirm, but it does not specify every nominee has to be entertained. Meanwhile, Senate rules DO say that information such as that held by Feinstein will be introduced BCD, discussed, investigated and communicated to the nominee giving that person an honorable way to back out, if prudent to do so, without being smeared publicly by the press. The dims are a miserable lot.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 02:49 PM   #18
Hotrod511
Valued Poster
 
Hotrod511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 9, 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
what difference does it make? this election coming up has enormous implications for the future direction of the Country, as does this Court Nominee.

besides, the Constitution doesn't say anything about stalling during Presidential election years.
Well you seem like a well educated person! who is the person that picks the supreme court justice? its not congress, so the democraps don't have anyone to blame but themselves and Joe Biden

Hotrod511 is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 02:52 PM   #19
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,247
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
yes I did. of course there are unsubstantiated smears from both sides.. it's politics, and the stakes are high. I'm sure the Democrats have sat on the stories for a very long time, I'm sure they knew shit soon after Trump released his "list" of potential SC candidates in 2016.

but the real point is, no matter how low and disgusting the Democrats may be, at least Kavanaugh is getting a hearing. Obama's choice was never afforded ANY CHANCE
OBama knew the Republicans would enact the so called “Biden Rule”. Garland was a moderate judge, not Obama’s cup of tea. So it was OBama that played Garland. He wanted to make Republicans look bad for not giving a moderate judge a hearing. If it were 2 years earlier, OBama would have nominated a Sotamyor clone
bambino is online now   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 04:06 PM   #20
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Such. Whining.

Hypocritical politics at its finest. But I am sure in this case the RWWs on here will have some truly creative arithmetic to back up their point. Just like we are supposed to believe he kept his authentic and complete date books from school.

Just as the LWWs will have many justifications about why these accusations did not surface when K's name was first put out there. And BS about an FBI investigation that will find almost nothing definitive whether he is guilty or not. His supporters will lie or conveniently forget in one direction, his detractors will lie or conveniently forget in the other.

Neither side cares about the quality of the nominee (as exemplified by the bogus excuses for not releasing far more info from his writings). It is all about the days to election and "winning".
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 04:09 PM   #21
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,247
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T View Post
Hypocritical politics at its finest. But I am sure in this case the RWWs on here will have some truly creative arithmetic to back up their point. Just like we are supposed to believe he kept his authentic and complete date books from school.

Just as the LWWs will have many justifications about why these accusations did not surface when K's name was first put out there. And BS about an FBI investigation that will find almost nothing definitive whether he is guilty or not. His supporters will lie or conveniently forget in one direction, his detractors will lie or conveniently forget in the other.

Neither side cares about the quality of the nominee (as exemplified by the bogus excuses for not releasing far more info from his writings). It is all about the days to election and "winning".
Republicans voted for RBG, Kagen and Sotamayor in large numbers.
bambino is online now   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 04:10 PM   #22
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
what difference does it make? this election coming up has enormous implications for the future direction of the Country, as does this Court Nominee.

besides, the Constitution doesn't say anything about stalling during Presidential election years.
You don't understand at all--the difference is the RWWs LIKE this nominee. That is all the difference they need in their minds.
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 04:14 PM   #23
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
Republicans voted for RBG, Kagen and Sotamayor in large numbers.
True. But I am not sure what that has to do with withholding so much of K's writings, OR with the game-playing the Dems are doing with the timing of the accusations and the FBI investigation request.

Release the papers, hear the accusers, hear K, and vote. The people deciding should have the info on K's actually thoughts, and the vote should not be held hostage to bogus stall tactics.
Old-T is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 04:56 PM   #24
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,697
Encounters: 15
Default

So Joe and his Bimbo are upset with the hack journalism emminating out of the Major News Net Works.

In other news......"Hell Freezes Over"
Jackie S is online now   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 05:22 PM   #25
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,247
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T View Post
True. But I am not sure what that has to do with withholding so much of K's writings, OR with the game-playing the Dems are doing with the timing of the accusations and the FBI investigation request.

Release the papers, hear the accusers, hear K, and vote. The people deciding should have the info on K's actually thoughts, and the vote should not be held hostage to bogus stall tactics.
I agree with that. I disagree with your statement that neither side cares about the qualifications. At least Republicans vote for the Democrats nominees. No drama. The Republicans never Borked a judge, never lynched a judge or smeared a judge.
bambino is online now   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:02 PM   #26
Tsmokies
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2014
Location: Near mid cities but never whaco
Posts: 4,765
Encounters: 9
Default

The GOP said no vote until after the election. We have an election really soon. Wtf, let the people decide on who votes for a nominee from a fkn idiot
Tsmokies is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:07 PM   #27
Swellfella7
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2, 2011
Location: ?
Posts: 14
Default

I find it difficult to believe the female accusers, because as this (and every) political thread amply demonstrates, every Rapeublican you’ll ever meet is secretly an enormous faggot.
Swellfella7 is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 08:14 PM   #28
The_Waco_Kid
BANNED
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,112
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swellfella7 View Post
I find it difficult to believe the female accusers, because as this (and every) political thread amply demonstrates, every Rapeublican you’ll ever meet is secretly an enormous faggot.

I'm a Republican ...
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 09:06 PM   #29
Swellfella7
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2, 2011
Location: ?
Posts: 14
Default

Exactly, and you’re a man who sucks a lot of dicks in a redneck shithole only known to the civilized world for two things: EDIT - WU Ken Starr systematically abetting the rape of college kids.

#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.
Swellfella7 is offline   Quote
Old 09-25-2018, 09:49 PM   #30
The_Waco_Kid
BANNED
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,112
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swellfella7 View Post
Exactly, and you’re a man who sucks a lot of dicks in a redneck shithole only known to the civilized world for two things: EDIT - WU and Ken Starr systematically abetting the rape of college kids.

thank you for your enlightened replies .. we all find them interesting.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved