impeachment scenario

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

would uterus care to be more specific on your point? Or are uterus merely trolling again?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So uterus claim Fox is fake news. I say CNN is biased news, not fake, same as Fox. So do uterus believe CNN? i certainly hope uterus do!


thank uterus valued poster!


BAHHAHAHAAAAAAA

Stop drinking or get Grammarly.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

hmm.. an obvious bernie supporter!

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Stop drinking or get Grammarly.

then uterus didn't have a point after all. Thank uterus for clearing that up!

When uterus thinck uterus can prove your point, uterus can try again.

Thank uterus valued poster!

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

would uterus care to be more specific on your point? Or are uterus merely trolling again?

My point has already been made. Over and over again. You just don't want to beleive the evidence.

First discredit the foundation for the investigation. The dossier.

Then deny the accusations. "I don't even know where Russia is." Trump

Then claim the evidence isn't enough to prosecute. Install your houseboy to clean up your lies.

He's in a house of lawyers in DC. THE CARDS ARE FALLING.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

hmm.. an obvious bernie supporter!

This guy's a GENIUS.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

My point has already been made. Over and over again. You just don't want to beleive the evidence.

First discredit the foundation for the investigation. The dossier.

Then deny the accusations. "I don't even know where Russia is." Trump

Then claim the evidence isn't enough to prosecute. Install your houseboy to clean up your lies.

He's in a house of lawyers in DC. THE CARDS ARE FALLING.

Are uterus referring to Mueller's conclusion that Trump should be impeached? I'm afraid uterus will have to post that here so uterus can prove that point. Do uterus want to continue to claim that the Steele dossier is accurate when Mueller himself debunked nearly all of it in his report? Well he did and we have posted that many times in this forum. Do uterus want me to post it again?

i hope uterus don't thinck the Wall Street Journal is fake news? I wonder why uterus would thinck that?

because uterus see that the Steele Dossier is the linchpin to everything and simply by debunking it Mueller himself has proved my point and uterus continue to be in DaNile over it.

that's what uterus get for believing that Saint Mueller would save uterus from this horrid national nightmare.

Mueller Report Dismisses Many Steele Dossier Claims

https://www.wsj.com/articles/mueller...ms-11555710147


So would uterus care to reply with your proof? i thinck uterus don't have any, but i'll let uterus give it a try. do uterus thinck uterus are up to it?


asking for a friend.

[eccieuser9500]

Tell your friend . . .

McGahn told Mueller that in June 2017 — one month after Mueller’s appointment — the president reacted to reports that Mueller was investigating him for obstruction of justice by calling him at home and “direct[ing] him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflict of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre.”

In January 2018, the New York Times reported that Trump ordered McGahn to have the Justice Department fire Mueller the previous June. According to what McGahn told Mueller, Trump reacted to the report by asking McGahn to fabricate evidence that could be used to refute it.

“The President then directed [then-White House official Rob] Porter to tell McGahn to create a record to make clear that the President never directed McGahn to fire the Special Counsel,” the report says. “McGahn shrugged off the request, explaining that the media reports were true.”

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...tice-statement

That way you don't have to look like a blind fool.

[eccieuser9500]

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Tell your friend . . .

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...tice-statement

That way you don't have to look like a blind fool.

do uterus thinck VOX is fake? or do uterus thinck VOX is merely biased?

do uterus know that Trump allowed McGahn to speak with the Mueller team when as WH counsel Trump have claimed executive privilege? Do uterus thinck Trump would do that if he was concerned about that? in fact, Trump did not claim executive privilege at all?

And uterus know that despite this so-called "evidence" that Mueller still could not make a case for indictment or impeachment? if this is so important, why do uterus thinck Mueller did NOT use it as a basis for obstruction?

[eccieuser9500]

It was not up to the special prosecutor. His majesty's lackey doesn't want to use his own baby to set precedent. Simple.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It was not up to the special prosecutor. His majesty's lackey doesn't want to use his own baby to set precedent. Simple.

yes it was. the mandate of a special prosecutor is clear .. "indict or decline to indict"






what part of his mandate don't uterus understand?

[eccieuser9500]

Who's the boss?

The report was Barr's baby. Meuller was just the surrogate. If Meuller passes the fuckin' buck,

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...r-legal-226111

‘If there is any exoneration on the question of whether Trump obstructed justice, it has been done by Barr, not by Mueller[.]’

then it's up to the final stooge.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I came. I "saw". I bent my GOP-ass over.

[eccieuser9500]

REMOVED