Anybody Watching The Confirmation Hearing?

[gnadfly]

The Dems are in full panic mode. They are making circular arguments, non arguments, grandstanding and my favorite: mind reading what the Founding Fathers meant. It's not pretty. Actually kind of shameful.

Kavanaugh reaches for his pen every time a Senator takes to the mic but puts in puts it down after 15 seconds when its apparent the Dems are just going through talking points. And the ABORTIONS. ABORTION! ABORTION! ABORTION! Like there's a chance that Roe v Wade will be overturned. I'm not holding my breath.

[Jackie S]

I'm watching in my office.

Going under the assumption that nobody President Trump sends up will be acceptable to the Democrats, I say just let the Democrats turn more Counties red as America sees who, and what they represent, take the vote, and confirm the nominee.

[Hotrod511]

I see where this Hollywood lib was removed from the hearing


http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...g-protest.html

[Yssup Rider]

Reminds me of the Garland hearings... oops!

[gnadfly]

Elections have consequences.

[Yssup Rider]

So does treason.

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

So does treason.

you're dreaming again yssup but that's a good thing lets you know you're getting a good nights rest

[kehaar]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

So does treason.

Can you explain this point?

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Reminds me of the Garland hearings... oops!

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

So does treason.

Please stay on topic or open another treason thread.

Originally Posted by kehaar

Can you explain this point?

Go to his treason thread. This thread is about the Kavanaugh circus.

[kehaar]

I thought he was talking about the nominee.

[I B Hankering]

These dims are ridiculous. Every dim there has already announced that they will not vote to confirm Kavanaugh; hence, Booker, et al's, demand for additional documents is pure obstructionism. And Blumenthal's stance that the withheld documents are "property of the people" given the dim's previous stance of hildebeest's Secretary of State emails is also hypocritical.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by kehaar

Can you explain this point?

Treason has consequences.

Don't you agree?

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Treason has consequences.

Don't you agree?

RTM'ed. This thread is about the Kavanaugh hearing. Stay on topic. Open your own thread.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

These dims are ridiculous. Every dim there has already announced that they will not vote to confirm Kavanaugh; hence, Booker, et al's, demand for additional documents is pure obstructionism. And Blumenthal's stance that the withheld documents are "property of the people" given the dim's previous stance of hildebeest's Secretary of State emails is also hypocritical.

Pity that Booker is right. From top to bottom, he's right on. There is no logical defense for his request.

While I won't stoop to name calling the opposition party -- it is unconscionable that Republicans are crying about obstructionism after the disgraceful disposition of the last SCOTUS nomination.

And now to use the word "hypocritical" is, well, hypocritical!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

These dims are ridiculous. Every dim there has already announced that they will not vote to confirm Kavanaugh; hence, Booker, et al's, demand for additional documents is pure obstructionism. And Blumenthal's stance that the withheld documents are "property of the people" given the dim's previous stance of hildebeest's Secretary of State emails is also hypocritical.

Would that include the documents that Sandy Berger stuffed down his pants or the notes that Comey kept or the emails that Hillary destroyed?