Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
The DNC never released its servers to the FBI for a forensic examination; hence, the government's case in these indictments is entirely based on what Crowdstrike -- a firm employed by Team hildebeest -- has allowed the FBI to see.
So, legal beagles, can the government build a case entirely based on what a partisan third party has given them, or will it be dismissed out-of-hand as "hearsay evidence"?
Quote:
Rod Rosenstein’s Spy Indictment Raises More Questions Than Answers
By S.Noble - July 14, 2018
Rod Rosenstein announced an indictment against 12 Russians this week, but he never explained how the DoJ/FBI were able to conclude the Russians hacked Dim-retard emails when no one but Crowdstrike saw the original servers. The FBI never bothered to take possession of the servers.
The FBI never had access to the DCCC, DNC, and hildebeest campaign servers, or at least that’s what we were told.
Rosenstein has 35 defendents – Russian intelligence officers – who will never show up for trial. It’s very similar to the Russian troll case which is turning into a fiasco. One of the Russians sent a lawyer to defend one of the companies and the DoJ doesn’t want to let them see the evidence.
Is this still America?
It is also interesting that Rosenstein is passing this case off to the DoJ National Security Division. That’s the secret group involved in the FISA – 702 database searches of Americans.
Rosenstein is a liar. According to Rep. Mark Meadows, Lisa Page didn’t know about the interview requests for seven months. If accurate, that’s another Rosenstein lie. He is keeping witnesses and information from Congress. On the other hand, something is missing in this story. It was well-known that the congressional committees wanted to speak with her.
Remarkably, we learned new information today suggesting the DOJ had not notified Lisa Page of Congress’ outstanding interview requests for over 7 months now. The DOJ/FBI appear to be continuing their efforts to keep material facts, and perhaps even witnesses, from Congress.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) July 13, 2018
ROSENSTEIN ANNOUNCED PREVIOUSLY KNOWN INFORMATION
It’s also strange that Rosenstein felt the need to announce the indictment of 12 Russians immediately after Peter Srzok’s embarrassing performance at the House hearing and immediately before the President is to meet with President Putin.
Every time the President travels abroad, some Dim-retard or Dim-retard operative embarrasses the President. At the same time, the Dim-retard hacks led by Cryin' Chucky Schumer are demanding the President cancel his meeting with Russian President Putin. What are they afraid of?
This is especially interesting given the fact that this information had already been uncovered.
Specifically you only had to read page 4 findings 7-10. Just reading Chapter 2 you would have got the gist of it..all this despite the ridiculous redactions. Sadly the media ignored most of our findings on March 22 and the whole report since April 27. https://t.co/umYtRL5hd5
The FBI Never Asked For Access To Hacked Computer Servers
Posted on January 4, 2017, at 5:13 p.m.
WASHINGTON — The FBI did not examine the servers of the Dim-retard National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyberintrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.
Six months after the FBI first said it was investigating the hack of the Dim-retard National Committee's computer network, the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system, one US intelligence official told BuzzFeed News.
“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI's Cyber Division and its Washington (DC) Field Office, the Department of Justice's National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney's Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC's computer servers,” Eric Walker, the DNC’s deputy communications director, told BuzzFeed News in an email.
The FBI has instead relied on computer forensics from a third-party tech security company, CrowdStrike, which first determined in May of last year that the DNC’s servers had been infiltrated by Russia-linked hackers, the U.S. intelligence official told BuzzFeed News.
“CrowdStrike is pretty good. There’s no reason to believe that anything that they have concluded is not accurate,” the intelligence official said, adding they were confident Russia was behind the widespread hacks.
The FBI declined to comment.
“Beginning at the time the intrusion was discovered by the DNC, the DNC cooperated fully with the FBI and its investigation, providing access to all of the information uncovered by CrowdStrike — without any limits,” said Walker, whose emails were stolen and subsequently distributed throughout the cyberattack.
It’s unclear why the FBI didn’t request access to the DNC servers, and whether it’s common practice when the bureau investigates the cyberattacks against private entities by state actors, like when the Sony Corporation was hacked by North Korea in 2014.
BuzzFeed News spoke to three cybersecurity companies who have worked on major breaches in the last 15 months, who said that it was "par for the course" for the FBI to do their own forensic research into the hacks.
FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report
BY KATIE BO WILLIAMS - 01/04/17 07:29 PM EST
According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers.
Since it would have already been leaked if they had (or at least in a timely fashion) I guess they still only have the logs that Crowdstrike gave them.
The Truth is out there ????/// However we will never be told the truth. Billary and the dnc are up to the asses in this whole mess , still trying to say dumper isn't the boss
Hillary set up an illegal server without much security that had to be hacked by foreign powers. She lost 20+ devices and had her emails discovered on a pc used by right hand woman's perv husband.
The DNC was hacked even though they were warned by the FBI before hand. They haven't let the FBI examine their servers. Supposedly this came from a relatively stupid phishing attacks. They lost a ton of emails and files. Other democratic assets at the same time were also hacked but we really haven't learn a lot of details.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz hired the Awan brothers who turned out to be either part of an Pakistani crime family or foreign agents or both. The handed over access to the 30 HoR computer systems without a background check.
What this tells me is the Democrats don't know shit about national security much less computer security.
A good defense attorney would challenge every one of Mueller's indictments on the basis of the evidence being third-party "hearsay," and then there's the issue that a bona fide chain-of-custody of the evidence was never established from the beginning.
Hillary set up an illegal server without much security that had to be hacked by foreign powers. She lost 20+ devices and had her emails discovered on a pc used by right hand woman's perv husband.
The DNC was hacked even though they were warned by the FBI before hand. They haven't let the FBI examine their servers. Supposedly this came from a relatively stupid phishing attacks. They lost a ton of emails and files. Other democratic assets at the same time were also hacked but we really haven't learn a lot of details.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz hired the Awan brothers who turned out to be either part of an Pakistani crime family or foreign agents or both. The handed over access to the 30 HoR computer systems without a background check.
What this tells me is the Democrats don't know shit about national security much less computer security.
AND, don't GIVE a SHIT about the law and, specifically, the CONSTITUTION and laws concerning classified information.
A good defense attorney would challenge every one of Mueller's indictments on the basis of the evidence being third-party "hearsay," and then there's the issue that a bona fide chain-of-custody of the evidence was never established from the beginning.
Do you support Putin and his agenda, I Comerade? Yes or no.
Do you support Putin and his agenda, I Comerade? Yes or no.
A good defense attorney would challenge every one of Mueller's indictments on the basis of the evidence being third-party "hearsay", you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. And then there's the issue that a bona fide chain-of-custody of the evidence was never established from the beginning, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
Trump was asking about the DNC server and Hillary’s missing emails today with Putin. I bet Vlad knows who hacked it.
Yes and remember when Trump said we need to look into the Russians and our voting process and the Dems Lord and Savior, NOT. And just what did Obama say? Told him to quite whining.
And the corruption continues , Attack dumper on all levels BUT lets FORGET about Billarys e-mail/dnc ISSUES and Debbie working with the enemy ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,
Everyone (except the illiterate on the left) is invited to read the comments section of this article @ The Daily Wire. Skip the article and go directly to the comments to see the back and forth on the legal problems government prosecutors might have pressing a case against the indicted Russian operatives.
The FBI never examined the DNC's hacked servers
My Bio Page - Florida - Miami/South Florida
