Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 370
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 262
sharkman29 250
George Spelvin 244
Top Posters
DallasRain70376
biomed160259
Yssup Rider59839
gman4452859
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47421
pyramider46370
bambino40273
CryptKicker37060
Mokoa36482
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35127
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2017, 10:33 PM   #31
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA LORD TRUMP
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,127
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
The reason the subsidy is needed is because the government is asking the health insurance companies to sell health insurance policies to people "WHO ARE ALREADY SICK". This alone is driving up cost for a health insurance company to conduct business. So, prior to 2010 before the ACA became law, health insurance companies simply did not sell health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions or people who were already sick in the Individual market.

The ACA is doing what it is suppose to do, get more people insured. Premium spikes that we have seen in some states will level off as the risk pools become more balanced.

when will u admit that it's not doing what it was supposed to do? self-fund by compelling by IRS fine everyone of age to get health insurance? why are the Gov subsidized exchanges such money losing deals that all (well to be fair most) of the major players have gotten out of them???

not once in all your bloviating about how great ACA is supposed to be, have you explained that point. idiot.

The ACA is not collapsing under its own weight. Health insurance companies filed there rate increases with the commissioner of insurance for each state that they plan to do business in. In 2017 there was at least one provider in every county of the USA. Each state had more that one health insurance provider.

it's collapsing under the weight of a socialist single-player black hole. idiot. socialist. dumbfuck.

Last thing, the Obamacare plans sold on the Government Exchange is "REAL INSURANCE" and is accepted at good hospitals like Children's Hospital in Houston, Texas. (One of the best hospitals in the state)
so like ... do u even have ACA? bahaha. i don't i have an employer policy. so like ... why do i even care about it?

bahhahahaaaaa


The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 10:36 PM   #32
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post
So 10 milion more people got health insurance than before. At what cost? Bilions of dollars? Tens of billions? Hundreds of billions? How much does that come out to per person?
US Population Count as of 11/3/17 - 325,246,840 (based on United Nations Estimates)

Cost of ACA (Obamacare private plan subsidies and expanded Medicaid in 31 states) 800 billion over a 10 year period. (based on estimates by CBO)

Cost per person = 800,000,000,000 / 325,246,840 = $2,459.67
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 10:42 PM   #33
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
so like ... do u even have ACA? bahaha. i don't i have an employer policy. so like ... why do i even care about it?

bahhahahaaaaa


Where do you want people who already sick to get their health insurance from? Dumb hillbilly fuck.
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 10:53 PM   #34
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA LORD TRUMP
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,127
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
US Population Count as of 11/3/17 - 325,246,840 (based on United Nations Estimates)

Cost of ACA (Obamacare private plan subsidies and expanded Medicaid in 31 states) 800 billion over a 10 year period. (based on estimates by CBO)

Cost per person = 800,000,000,000 / 325,246,840 = $2,459.67
per whom person? everyone? or just the ACA GOV socialist welfare recipients?

if it was that cheap .. your numbers .. bahhahaaaa

2,459.67 (correct me if i'm wrong but is this your "estimate" ) so is this your calculated monthly for anyone with non-workplace insurance?

204.92 a month. full coverage, medical, prescriptions, dental, vision? is that what you posted??
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 10:56 PM   #35
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA LORD TRUMP
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,127
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
Where do you want people who already sick to get their health insurance from? Dumb hillbilly fuck.
keep reading idiot. it's for U just some pesky math numbers .. do try to keep up. bahaha


Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
per whom person? everyone? or just the ACA GOV socialist welfare recipients?

if it was that cheap .. your numbers .. bahhahaaaa

2,459.67 (correct me if i'm wrong but is this your "estimate" ) so is this your calculated monthly for anyone with non-workplace insurance?

204.92 a month. full coverage, medical, prescriptions, dental, vision? is that what you posted??
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 11:07 PM   #36
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
per whom person? everyone? or just the ACA GOV socialist welfare recipients?

if it was that cheap .. your numbers .. bahhahaaaa

2,459.67 (correct me if i'm wrong but is this your "estimate" ) so is this your calculated monthly for anyone with non-workplace insurance?

204.92 a month. full coverage, medical, prescriptions, dental, vision? is that what you posted??
JD's original question is how much is it costing each citizen to have the ACA law implemented. The ACA law is costing each citizen aprox $2,459.67 over a 10 year period. OR

The ACA law is costing each citizen apox $245.97 per year.

JD's question is not about insurance coverage.
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 11:27 PM   #37
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA LORD TRUMP
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,127
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
Where do you want people who already sick to get their health insurance from? Dumb hillbilly fuck.
only now, at the end, do you realize, young socialist, the TRUE POWER OF CAPITALISM!!!




bahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaa
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 11:49 PM   #38
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
only now, at the end, do you realize, young socialist, the TRUE POWER OF CAPITALISM!!!
In the USA the means of production is not controlled by the state, therefore the Socialist label simply does not apply.

Your hero Bush43 signed into law Medicare Part D, which has taxpayers helping seniors pay for their prescriptions. Using your logic is Bush43 a socialist?

Last but not least, two of your favorite people Kim Kardashian and Kanye West just sold one of their homes for $18 million dollars. So how could the USA be socialist?
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:19 AM   #39
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA LORD TRUMP
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,127
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
JD's original question is how much is it costing each citizen to have the ACA law implemented. The ACA law is costing each citizen aprox $2,459.67 over a 10 year period. OR

The ACA law is costing each citizen apox $245.97 per year.

JD's question is not about insurance coverage.
so yer fucktard socialist ass is saying what???????


the extra to cover this bullshit is $245.97 per year.?? To me ... so you say that by basic math i;m only paying $20 a month for .. welfare bums and freeloaders to have insurance?? is that what u are saying??

oh and let's mention that Obama made it a CRIME by IRS fine (tax codes issues are a crime if u didn't know) and u still get nada young enrolls.

WHY IS THAT FAGGER??

how does the math work out here???

HOW!!!!
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 01:13 AM   #40
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post

the extra to cover this bullshit is $245.97 per year.?? To me ... so you say that by basic math i;m only paying $20 a month for .. welfare bums and freeloaders to have insurance?? is that what u are saying??


how does the math work out here???

HOW!!!!
That's about right Hillbilly. Each citizen is paying about $20 a month for 10 years so that 6 million people will get a subsidy on the government exchange and another 10 million people will get the expanded Medicaid.

Note: the bums and the people who don't work are taken care of by Original Medicaid, which was signed into law by LBJ in 1965. Original Medicaid is not a part of the calculation for the question JD asked. You got all this now Hillbilly?
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 07:43 AM   #41
dilbert firestorm
Premium Access
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
That's about right Hillbilly. Each citizen is paying about $20 a month for 10 years so that 6 million people will get a subsidy on the government exchange and another 10 million people will get the expanded Medicaid.

Note: the bums and the people who don't work are taken care of by Original Medicaid, which was signed into law by LBJ in 1965. Original Medicaid is not a part of the calculation for the question JD asked. You got all this now Hillbilly?
where do you come up with those numbers?

its no where near what I'v read of other people's insurance cost.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 09:09 PM   #42
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
where do you come up with those numbers?

its no where near what I'v read of other people's insurance cost.
I explained where the numbers came from in post #32. The calculation is the cost per person to fund the cost of the ACA law which is $800 billion over 10 years. (estimate from CBO 2010 projections).

It is not a calculation of how much each health insurance policy cost for the 16 million people who received some type of subsidy from the Federal Government to get their coverage.

Remember if you are a family of 4 and your income is > $94,000 you do not get a subsidy you pay out of pocket. Same goes if you are single and your income > $48,000.
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2017, 08:38 AM   #43
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

Explain this frghty65...

https://conservativetribune.com/obam...ddleclass/amp/

“Policy of the People”- 80% of Obamacare Mandate Paid by Sub $50K Households

Quote:
Barack Obama ran as a hero for the common American, promising “hope and change” for the nation’s downtrodden.

It’s no surprise that his signature legislation, Obamacare, was also marketed as an amazing benefit for the middle class and poor Americans.

However, a new report reveals that Obama’s true legacy should actually be taking money out of the pockets of average Americans in one of the rawest deals since Bernie Madoff.

According to Forbes contributor Ryan Ellis, the individual mandate that is at the center of Obamacare actually hits working-class families the hardest.

“The mandate is a tax which punishes those who can least afford it,” Ellis wrote.

TRENDING: “Policy of the People”- 80% of Obamacare Mandate Paid by Sub $50K Households

He looked at the breakdown of who actually pays the individual mandate surtax, which is the penalty that kicks in if a person doesn’t purchase government-approved health insurance. What he found was shocking.

“According to the IRS, some 6.7 million American families pay Obamacare’s individual mandate surtax, forking over $3 billion annually to Uncle Sam merely for exercising their right not to purchase an unaffordable Obamacare plan,” Ellis wrote.

“It turns out most of these taxpayers are solidly in the middle class. The great majority of them (80 percent) actually make less than $50,000 per year. This is perhaps the most regressive tax we have on the books today.”

Around 5.3 million Americans who earn under $50,000 annually were forced to pay the mandate penalty, which averaged about $340 per person.

Yes, average citizens are being charged hundreds of dollars for the right to not buy expensive insurance. So much for the “Affordable” Care Act.

Sen. Steve Daines, a Montana Republican, did a similar analysis of the numbers, and came to the same conclusion: Individuals and families making under $50,000 are the ones being burdened by the mandate.

What would happen if the mandate and its penalties were dissolved? Contrary to the doom and gloom spread by Obamacare’s proponents, the sky probably wouldn’t fall.

“Ending the individual mandate surtax will not cause anyone to lose their health insurance,” Ellis argued. “It will merely stop punishing people who choose not to buy expensive insurance with a surtax they cannot afford, either.”

RELATED: Report: Congress Wouldn’t Act, So Now Trump’s Prepping Exec Order on Obamacare

During the push to pass Obamacare, Democrats and Obama himself waved away the penalty or surtax as something that middle-class people didn’t need to worry about.

That penalty, they insisted, would be for rich Americans who were wealthy enough to cover their medical expenses out of pocket, or who wanted some exotic insurance plan that didn’t meet the Obamacare requirements.

Like so much — dare we say all? — of Obamacare, the promises turned out to be lies. It was snake oil sold by Democrats who were desperate for a political win.

Nobody disputes that America’s health care system can be improved, but Obamacare was not the way.

Like so much of his agenda, Obama’s Obamacare legacy is falling apart.

H/T Breitbart

Please press “Share on Facebook” to help spread these eye-opening facts about the Affordable Care Act!
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 11:27 PM   #44
flghtr65
Valued Poster
 
flghtr65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 2,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB View Post
Explain this frghty65...

https://conservativetribune.com/obam...ddleclass/amp/

“Policy of the People”- 80% of Obamacare Mandate Paid by Sub $50K Households
Is this suppose to be a gotcha question, IFFY? Let's recap what your post is saying. Basically, people who earn less than $50,000 have to pay a $340 tax/fine per person if they choose not get health insurance.

What your article fails to mention is that people who make $50,000 are eligible to get a large subsidy from the government to help pay their premium in the individual market. After the subsidy is applied the cost of your premium for year is about the same as the amount of the tax.

Consider this example. A family of two that makes $50,000 will get a subsidy of $420 dollars. Using this Michigan zip code of 48083 there are a couple of plans that will have the monthly premium of $60 after the government subsidy is applied. In this example the premium for the year is $720. According to your article the tax for not having health insurance is $340 per person or $680 for a married couple. The policy premium for the year is only $40 more than the tax. The government is helping people in this income range. For an extra $40 you can have a "real health insurance policy" from a company like BCBS. Everything stated can be backed up at ehealthinsurance.com.



https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/ehi/rc/all-plans
flghtr65 is offline   Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 12:15 AM   #45
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA LORD TRUMP
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 35,127
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flghtr65 View Post
Is this suppose to be a gotcha question, IFFY? Let's recap what your post is saying. Basically, people who earn less than $50,000 have to pay a $340 tax/fine per person if they choose not get health insurance.

What your article fails to mention is that people who make $50,000 are eligible to get a large subsidy from the government to help pay their premium in the individual market. After the subsidy is applied the cost of your premium for year is about the same as the amount of the tax.

Consider this example. A family of two that makes $50,000 will get a subsidy of $420 dollars. Using this Michigan zip code of 48083 there are a couple of plans that will have the monthly premium of $60 after the government subsidy is applied. In this example the premium for the year is $720. According to your article the tax for not having health insurance is $340 per person or $680 for a married couple. The policy premium for the year is only $40 more than the tax. The government is helping people in this income range. For an extra $40 you can have a "real health insurance policy" from a company like BCBS. Everything stated can be backed up at ehealthinsurance.com.



https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/ehi/rc/all-plans
blah blah. didn't read one word.


just tell me now .. why didn't those prime demographics .. 25 to mid 30 .. SIGN UP????



you never address that .. fagger65.

WHY?
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved