Pelosi Objects to CNN Anchor’s Claim That Trump Was Acquitted in Impeachment Trial

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It wasn't a real trial. Just opening and closing arguments, and then a decision. If you want to call that a trial, so be it. It wasn't anything close to a trial the Judiciary would have held.

But then the House didn't exactly have a fair evidentiary hearing. No justice in either case. I thought it was outrageous when the House counsel questioned the Executive's counsel.

Maybe a better description would be the case was summarily dismissed. Rather than any real judgment found. What did they judge? Just the evidence without new, or direct, corroboration.

When you can make the rules to suit your needs, that's what happens. I posted long ago that nobody should be up in arms over what was going to happen.

I can go with summarily dismissed.

[Unique_Carpenter]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

I have a new phrase:
Demlusional

Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Can I get the Canadian rights to that gem?

I'm keeping the North American continent rights. You can have the Ukrainian rights for the cost of my next bar tab in Athens.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

I have a new phrase:

Demlusional

ftfy!!!

[dilbert firestorm]

e9500...


why don't you tell us the unwashed clueless how fair the impeachment trial on the house side was???

[oeb11]

Amen - 9500- please deign to show the Path of Truth to the irredeemable deplorables that the Elites such as H.... , and other Fascist DPST's have such contempt for!!!

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Projection 101. I'm not bothered. You're just like the POTUS.




You two are the dumbasses who go off when I just post my comment on this thread. And Wacko says I'm triggered?

We didn't go off. You're the one who gets all fussy over Trump. He wasn't removed from office or convicted, so there must be a coverup, lol. Not being able to accept the outcome of political decisions is a sign of weakness. Also making shit up or misinterpreting information that fits your world view is also a sign one may have a few screws loose. Adam Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi and Schumer are just a few that come to mind. Don't follow in their path.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

e9500...


why don't you tell us the unwashed clueless how fair the impeachment trial on the house side was???

Read post 16 paragraph two. Technically only the Senate has the trial. The House made the case. Nothing about this was going to be fair.

Originally Posted by Levianon17

We didn't go off. You're the one who gets all fussy over Trump. He wasn't removed from office or convicted, so there must be a coverup, lol.

Didn't go off? First, after I post my comment, Wacko quotes my post and thinks I wrote it wasn't a trial. Then posts a reply with a host of links. Triggered.

Then you quote me with an insult in your reply. I don't care about the personal, just don't deny you popped off. Just because I made my opinion here.

Not being able to accept the outcome of political decisions is a sign of weakness. Also making shit up or misinterpreting information that fits your world view is also a sign one may have a few screws loose. Adam Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi and Schumer are just a few that come to mind. Don't follow in their path.

For those who knew how it would play out, aside from Pelosi holding on to the articles, we had already accepted it. When all is said and done, to summarize what actually happened is not misrepresenting factual information nor making shit up. The only loose screws were in the Senate. Other than Romney. More, and new, information to come to a better decision is not a waste of time. Coverup.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Read post 16 paragraph two. Technically only the Senate has the trial. The House made the case. Nothing about this was going to be fair.



For those who knew how it would play out, aside from Pelosi holding on to the articles, we had already accepted it. When all is said and done, to summarize what actually happened is not misrepresenting factual information nor making shit up. The only loose screws were in the Senate. Other than Romney. More, and new, information to come to a better decision is not a waste of time. Coverup.

so Congress put forth an unfair impeachment inquiry and it was unfair of the Senate to reject it.

got it!


BAHHAHAAAAAA

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

so Congress put forth an unfair impeachment inquiry and it was unfair of the Senate to reject it.

got it!


BAHHAHAAAAAA

You mean the House put forth, and the Senate rejected. The House and the Senate make up a bicameral Congress.

The way the case was made might have been unfair, but it was a consession of rules in the House to leave it up to the Senate to ask for direct evidence before reaching a decision. But they didn't. So they through it out. Under THEIR rules. Politics as usual. No muss no fuss, Lev17. (I just came up with that. I'll call him Lev. And you Wacko.)



P.S. What about YOUR bet with me that YOU ignored? I have a revision to it if you want to hear it.

[eccieuser9500]

duplicate

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

You mean the House put forth, and the Senate rejected. The House and the Senate make up a bicameral Congress.

The way the case was made might have been unfair, but it was a consession of rules in the House to leave it up to the Senate to ask for direct evidence before reaching a decision. But they didn't. So they through it out. Under THEIR rules. Politics as usual. No muss no fuss. I'm not throwing a hissy fit, Lev17. (I just came up with that. I'll call him Lev. And you Wacko.)



P.S. What about YOUR bet with me that YOU ignored? I have a revision to it if you want to hear it.

what complete horseshit. how many excuses are you gonna continue to make about the case the House presented when they had control of the deal? you've already posted their case was "kinda" unfair. that's a nice whitewash of their Kangaroo proceedings.



which bet? indulge me.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

which bet? indulge me.

Maybe this will remind you, because I don't have time to repost your post.

It was about Sanders and the POTUS going head-to-head. We put our accounts on the line. Then I replied I would just re-up with another handle. Alá HoeHummer.

Maybe because you looked stupid, you didn't redress it. But I have a twist to it. You 'member? You want to take me on? This is assuming, of course, Sanders gets the nomination. We both have an out.

The Ones We’ve Been Waiting For: How a New Generation of Leaders Will Transform America


https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-525-56150-7

The stories of these young men and women are framed by the issues and events that have shaped their generation, from the Columbine massacre through 9/11 to rising student debt and the advent of social media.

What say you, sir?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Maybe this will remind you, because I don't have time to repost your post.

It was about Sanders and the POTUS going head-to-head. We put our accounts on the line. Then I replied I would just re-up with another handle. Alá HoeHummer.

Maybe because you looked stupid, you didn't redress it. But I have a twist to it. You 'member? You want to take me on? This is assuming, of course, Sanders gets the nomination. We both have an out.

The Ones We’ve Been Waiting For: How a New Generation of Leaders Will Transform America


https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-525-56150-7


What say you, sir?

you accept a bet then state you'd welch on it then want to make another bet?

have you been drinking today? bhahaa


Trump will stomp Bernie's commie ass and i don't want you to have to change your handle so i can rub it in for the next 4 years.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

you accept a bet then state you'd welch on it then want to make another bet?

have you been drinking today? bhahaa


Trump will stomp Bernie's commie ass and i don't want you to have to change your handle so i can rub it in for the next 4 years.

Your bet was for me to disable the account. I would. How is that Welching? I'm not making another bet, but tweeking yours. Let's let Sanders win the nomination first. Do you want to hear what the stakes would be?

[oeb11]

Let's all conservatives get together and cross over - Vote Bernie in your state primary .

Nominate the Commie - the no holds barred campaign will show his Stalinist true self.

it is either that , or a brokered convention will nominate H..... for Round 2.
I think trump would win again - but it won't show up the DPST's Stalinist side nearly as well.



Thank you - 9500!!