Jackie our girl Condalisa

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Welcome back, HFC!

You picked a deserving target... if anyone on eccie needs to be on the receiving end of your carpet-bombing posts, it's Lubed WhinyAss!

Of course, he is such a massively obese FAT FATTY target it might not be necessary for you to resort to indiscriminate carpet-bombing... a single dumb bomb should suffice to take out his blubbery CARCASS!

Are you sure that said round wouldn't bounce back up? He has a cartoon in his honor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYvSiJupMBE

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

Tell everyone about how you wanted me to spoil you on the sugar daddy site ? You had no issues with me being a fat ass as long as I would send you money ?

They'll take your money, but not your cum. BWAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAA A! That's rich, that verifies what a lot of us here know about your situation.

And this is the CRUX of your animosity towards her, isn't it? When you offered an opportunity for her to take your pee pee, she essentially told you to fuck off, then subsequently placed you in the zone adjacent/outside of her friend zone. Judging by your attitude, I wouldn't be surprised if the other women in your life did the same thing.

I wouldn't be surprised that if you were to go to a red-light district, the woman on display would shake her head and tell you that there's no way in hell you'd have enough money.

[herfacechair]

MT Cranial Cavity: I think I see what the problem is here!

Based on your first reply to me on this thread, no, you have absolutely no clue about what you're talking about on this thread, or anywhere else for that matter. I was going to ignore all of your posts until you decided to grace me with your ignorance. Now sit back, relax, and watch me demonstrate to you how much you know of what isn't the case.

MT Cranial Cavity: RM thought if she mingled with the Conservatives she would drum up business.

RM is doing what I've seen providers do on both this message board, and on others like it across the country... Get exposure. If your cranium wasn't MT save for the occasional toy monkey banging its cymbals in there, you'd see that.

MT Cranial Cavity: It has back-fired miserably.

And you base this on what? Do you have her actual, raw data, information listing how many contacts she has had, and how many of those who contacted her actually followed through with a session? The reality is that you don't know if her jumping on here has impacted her business or not, just as you wouldn't know if the other providers that do this have successfully drummed their numbers up, or negatively impacted their business.

MT Cranial Cavity: Just because they outnumber the Liberals

Again, what are you basing this on? When I first jumped onto this site, conservatives were outnumbered. That appeared to have changed since I jumped on here and started to hammer these liberals head on. I've seen many of those on the conservative side of the house start using my tactics against the liberals. Now, it appears, they're shoving you people arse's down your collective throats. What I see happening is that many of the liberals are wisely not making your mistake... Opening their mouths and proving that they don't have a clue about what they're talking about.

MT Cranial Cavity: doesn't mean they actually see women.

I'm a conservative, and I see women. Every conservative that I know off also sees women. The fact that you don't see an increase in her reviews isn't a valid indicator on whether her business has gone up, down, or stagnated. Again, for every guy that leaves a review, many more go on without leaving a review. Pardon me if many of the conservatives here don't want to give you something to beat off to.

MT Cranial Cavity: She is a paid actor

If you had any experience with women outside of the hobby, you'd know that the most expensive woman you'll have is the one that you're married to. Much more so if you decide to get a divorce... In which case, you get a different form of fucking for the money that you're shelling out.

MT Cranial Cavity: and and they are broke ass blowhards.

Based on my situation, as well as that of the other conservatives, there's an excellent chance that most are TOO BUSY to drum up a review. I have posted a lot of reviews in the past on the account of my freelance writer background, as well as the fact that I use speech to text software to generate my posts.

Most of the broke ass blowhards that I know of are liberals and think like you and others that I argue against over here.

MT Cranial Cavity: Should have went with the Liberals

Nobody wants to go full-blown retard, so no, glad no real conservative went with the liberals.

MT Cranial Cavity: that don't let King James cock block them.

Coming from someone whose line of reasoning reminds me of someone trying to talk with his/her mouth full of cock.

MT Cranial Cavity: Hell I might see you If I get down that way. I just might not share my handle till we are done. LOL!

Actually, what would actually be something worth noticing is you demonstrating that you could use your head here for something other than a hair rack.

MT Brain Cavity: Your team didn't think that Dems would vote for Obama. That is why so many voted for him in the Primary.

False, they voted for him in the primary because they are gullible and susceptible to propaganda. They are low information voters who don't have a clue about current events, history, or anything that makes the real-world work on a geopolitical, geoeconomic, and geostrategic level. The media, complacent in its duties, failed to do what I remember it doing during the Democratic primaries in the 1980s, effectively vet the empty suite. They voted for him during the primary, and during the general election, because they were easily led by the nose ring by a media more interested in propagating propaganda than they were in actually doing the news.

I remember when Hillary Clinton went on Fox News, during the election of 2008. I remember her complementing Fox News over its fair coverage of the Democratic primaries. But the conservatives did not count on how deteriorated journalism has become since the 1980s.

MT Cranial Cavity: Carson was raised by basically a sharecropper and did receive welfare,just not section 8 housing. He also thinks college should be free for medical students. So how does that make him so special?

That's irrelevant. You failed to address the comment of the poster that you are addressing. All you really did, with this comment, is pointed to evidence that he lifted himself up by his bootstraps. The fact of the matter is that he does threaten the narrative that the criminally biased liberal media paints regarding Republicans and race. Obama had the help of a media that was more interested in presenting propaganda than it was in doing its job. Had the media been like the media that I watched back in the 1980s, Obama would've been vetted and he would've had to drop out of the primaries. Unlike Obama, Carson dealt with the forces of the free market and had a better understanding of how the free market worked than the community organizer did.

MT Cranial Cavity: Without Comey and Putin nobody would have beaten Hillary.

False. What didn't get as much attention, in the news regarding Russian interference, is that the fake news went to a small fraction of the population and did not impact the overall election. Do continue to make assumptions like this, you people keep missing the point as to why he won the electoral college, which was what he was going for.

Had the media actually did its job, we wouldn't be getting candidates, on the liberal side, who are to the far extreme left of the political spectrum where we ended up with Spillage Shrillery and Bolshevik Bernie.

MT Cranial Cavity: I will say this. I would trade Trump for any of the other candidates that ran including Kasich or Cruz.

The fact that someone like you, and the others on this thread who oppose him, don't like him, makes him even a better choice. People like you make me even happier for voting for him. However, had the Republican Party denied him the nomination, whoever the Democrats nominated would have won.

MT Cranial Cavity: Since I am not a Liberal I guess that was a waste of your time.

Your initial response to me in this thread, as well as the other things that you have said elsewhere in this thread, points to you as being a liberal. I've been arguing against liberals, online, for the past 13 years. I've yet have somebody who is in the middle of the political spectrum, or the conservative side of it, question my statements regarding my military background, or regarding my calling somebody else out on theirs. The fact that you did, added to the other liberal arguments that you have advanced on this thread, speak strongly to you being a liberal. In both responses to me, and to the other conservatives on this thread, you have gone by the same playbook that I have seen liberals go by over the past 13 years I have debated with them online.

So no, nobody wasted their time in sizing you up as a liberal, and in identifying how you liberals think. I get that as well, you made assumptions about what I meant, who I am, and what I was talking about, which doesn't end well for liberals. You're about to find that out here shortly.

If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and cracked like a duck, it must be a duck.

MT Cranial Cavity: But then again from the way you pigeon hole everyone I guess I am.

No, he didn't pigeonhole anybody. Your actions on this thread, and apparently your actions elsewhere on this message board, clearly identified you as a typical liberal. His referencing you as a liberal is no different than anybody referencing a cow as a cow. You act like a liberal, argue like a liberal, hence you're going to get called a liberal. I've lost count of how many liberals, that I have debated with over the past 13 years, who have insisted that they were not liberals and that I or another conservative had it "wrong" about them being liberal.

MT Cranial Cavity: To you anyone that does not lockstep with the conservatives is a Liberal.

False. Anybody that ACTS like a liberal is going to be identified as a liberal. For instance, your reply to me in this thread is typical of the reply I received from other liberals when I have made similar comments. We conservatives are not in complete agreement here or elsewhere. By your definition, I would be a "liberal" in those areas LL and I would not be in agreement on. Don't worry, I've hammered other liberals for thinking the way you think right here. You're not the first liberal that I have seen make that assumption.

MT Cranial Cavity: Except I haven't seen you call an actual Libertarian one.

There's a difference between the liberals that we argue against here, and elsewhere, and the libertarians. No, you guys are not libertarians. There's liberal, as in embracing the mindset, philosophy, and reasoning of those who are close to the socialist/communist parts of the Democratic Party. That is the category that you, and those that I have argued against over the past 13 years, fall under.

Libertarians are less likely to say things to me that you said to me in your first response on this thread. In fact, not only have they seen the facts and supported me with these facts, especially when it comes to arguments related to the military, they have been my strongest supporters. So yes, there is a difference. If you are implying that you are Libertarian, I assure you, you are not one.

Political tests that I've taken have placed me in the libertarian portion of the conservative side of the political spectrum. There is a difference between where I stand, and were liberals stand. You, with nothing in your cranial cavity other than an occational toy monkey banging its cymbals, are liberal.

MT Cranial Cavity: By the way, any person that reads your post would know how you think.

I've read his posts, what he thinks is not the same thing as what you think he thinks. What you think he thinks is nothing but a cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all, caricature of what your liberal talking head taskmasters have painted of us and have force-fed you into believing.

MT Cranial Cavity: Now whomever you are in real life may be a much different person. Most likely a frightened child like man. You are most likely a modern day wizard of OZ.

I've read his posts elsewhere on this board in addition to this thread. Both my current military background, which involves reviewing people's psychological profile, as well as my freelance writing background, entail the professional necessity to see a person's psychological makeup based on what they say on the Internet and elsewhere. As applied to here, what you guys say in your posts creates an obvious psychological profile. I don't recognize your assumption, of who he is as a person outside of this website, and him as I've seen his posts.

I don't say this lightly either. I received verification of the accuracy psychological profile I have come up with regarding the people that I have debated with online. This happened on a stolen valor site, where I had identified the psychological profile of a valor thief. Naturally, he disagreed. However, when his ex-wife jumped on thread, she verified the profile that I had on him as being accurate.

I tend to "abuse" this skill set to get the opposition to react the way I want them to react, then to expose their true nature. They may think that they are regaining control, but they don't realize that they are exposing more of their psychological makeup to me.

Let's hope that your assumptions of who he is, and of who I am, is not like your marksmanship skills. If so, I would hate to be the person standing behind you as you attempt to shoot the target in front of you, that would be suicide. That's how far off you are.

MT Cranial Cavity: If he does put me in my place he will be the first on here.

No, I'm not the first one to put you in your place, I've seen where others have put you in your place.

MT Cranial Cavity: Maybe he can provide me with what I think is the proper documents to determine if he is really part of the 1/9.

One ninth of what? Specify. I'll tell you the same thing that I told Private Major Luke_Wyatt. Firsthand experience to firsthand experience conversation. But we have to determine what exactly it is you're talking about.

MT Cranial Cavity: Or maybe he will say none of my fucking business like a normal person would.

You don't know how a normal person would act, or what they say, without a valid study determining what a normal person is, and what that person would do.

MT Cranial Cavity: Either way you are just a spectator LL.

Actually, he's using psychology to stir you guys up to rush yourselves into the meat grinder.

[herfacechair]

Originally posted by Rey Lengua:

Nice try at transference MT.

Liberals love to deflect their own traits against the conservatives that they are arguing against.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by herfacechair

BANG! GOT ONE!



I've been doing this for 13 years, there is a reason behind every word, and phrase, that I use in response to people like you. They are designed to get people like you to react a certain way. My words caused you to react the way I wanted you to react, you as a "retired SGM" would appreciate the planning and execution of this intent.

I got you in the jugular, based on your psychological profile that I am seeing with the responses, and you reacted exactly the way I expected you to react... Exactly how I have gotten other phonies/embellisher's to react. Just more proof that you are a phony or worse, an embellisher at best.

Do keep reacting the way you have been reacting here, you expose more of your psychological profile when you do. When that happens, that gives me more ammunition to say the things that will get you to react certain ways again.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: You are a lying POS it's against the rules to repeat verbatim what you asked me in pm but to paraphrase your message

We both know that the only lying POS between us is you. This is what I said in this thread:

"I asked him when did he retire, what his MOS was, how many years he served, and where he did his overseas tours at." - herfacechair

If you have any integrity, as expected of a retired Sergeant Major, you would know for fact that this quoted statement is a paraphrase of four individual questions that asked you in a PM.

These are questions that you consistently refused to answer, either via PM or on here. Considering that your mailbox is full, you at least have an alibi for not responding to my questions there. However, you had plenty of opportunities to answer those questions here.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: - I could see from a mile away where you were going:

Just like the other phonies and liberals that I have destroyed in the pit, you resort to using the same words that I used on you in your reply. It's like the losing boxer attempting to hang onto the winning boxer.

First, I wanted to give you a chance to actually prove that you are a veteran. Your responses to those questions would've assisted me in determining whether or not you were one. Again, real veterans would have no problems answering those questions. Your reaction proved to me that you're either a phony or an embellisher.

Second, you didn't see or smell anything from a mile away. So many real veterans have questioned your veteran claims that you automatically read the questions as if I was doing the same thing that they were doing. This speaks volumes to the fact that others could smell your BS from a mile away.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: " remember how you said how you admired my status and rank and wished to follow in my footsteps...(your words paraphrased)

False, I announced that I would be "following in your footsteps" in the form of my retiring. Nowhere, in any of my statements via PM, or here, do I state that I admired your status. Given the narcissism that emanates from your posts, and by extension from you, it wouldn't surprise me that you interpreted that statement as my admiring both you and your "rank". No, I did not tell you that I wished to follow in your footsteps. I know that for fact. You need to quit lying about our exchange as if it were another one love your phony military claims.

This is just further proof that lying comes naturally to you.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: I could smell the bullshit from a mile away

I'm sorry, but you have so much bullshit radiating from you that I highly doubt that the BS that you smell is coming from elsewhere. As much BS that you have spewed, it doesn't surprise me that you would assume that this BS came from another point from a mile away.

The lies, embellishments, self-aggrandizement's, and other antics that you engage in, makes you come across as someone doing the Mexican hat dance inside a barrel of crap. The only thing that you have accomplished is splatter poo all over the place.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: - my suggestion to you pussy face is put your membership on the line

Let's fix that to reflect what you are actually saying:

I refuse to answer any further questions about my nonmilitary service because I didn't serve. You people simply want to mock me so I refuse to participate with these questionings any further -- Luke_Wyatt fixed statement

But to address your phony challenge/offer. My preferred method doesn't involve exchanging personal information. All my method requires is for you to answer my questions, and for us to follow on via conversation that veterans would engage in.

Your phony offer requires providing personal information to the moderators. Unless I could personally scrutinize your so-called DD Form 214, your challenge/offer is invalid.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: or otherwise go suck your mothers cock.

I'm sorry, but the tranny that consistently plows into your back door, smacking your excessive ass fat and watching your ass ripple, while saying "This ass is no good," before forcing you to suck that same cock that the tranny is plowing into your ass, is not my mother.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: I am not going anywhere and there's not a damn thing you can do about it

What I said dumbass, from earlier in this thread:

"Fifth, a part of your offer is you leaving if your statement is proven invalid via a DD 214 check. Why would I want that? I don't want you to leave, because if you do, you would not be on here making a fool of yourself and proving your own claims, that you are a "retired SGM" false." - herfacechair

What part of the bolded red portion of that statement did you not understand? In fact, what part of that entire quote did you not understand? Read that quote multiple times if you have to, if necessary, until you understand what it is saying.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: - I love how you are giving me some much attention especially on someone's else post.

No you don't. The cold hard reality is that it annoys the crap out of you that I am hammering you with the intensity that I am hammering you here. You're not the first person, that I have debated with over the past 13 years, that has attempted to use the same ploy to get me off their backs. That's what it boils down to, doesn't it? You're pretending that I am "playing into your hands" when in reality you are "throwing the dice" in an exchange that you are getting destroyed in.

The attention that you're getting here is not the good kind of attention. Other real veterans have called you out on your phony military claims. My series of posts dives deeper into the fact that you are a phony veteran at worse, an embellisher at best.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: Looks like the military didn't train you right

This it is more proof that you are not who you claim to be. The analytical reasoning that I am using, to weave together my firsthand military knowledge and experience related to your claims, is proof that the military did indeed treat me right. I'm not the only one that is doing this. I've seen where other real veterans have done the same thing to you on other threads. One common theme that unites us is our military experiences, and the fact that we can smell military poser BS from a mile away.

Had you been a senior NCO, you know, like someone who is a retired Sergeant Major, you would see the military experience behind my generating these posts. I mean, for someone like you, who "was" a Sergeant Major, you know how intensive the communication is in the verbal and writing realms when it comes to senior NCO ranks. This includes a crap load of reading.

The fact that you would dismiss my series of posts as something that the "military didn't train me right" speaks volumes against you being a senior NCO, or even an NCO for that matter.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: or perhaps your skank whore of a mother did a poor job raising you.

You see, your statement is what I meant when I said this:

"What you said, via PM, and here, about my username, tells me that you see women as individuals that should be used, controlled, manipulated, abused, etc. You have no respect for women, and you look down on anyone who would dare two things to go counter to how you would do things." -- herfacechair

This tells me a few things about you. First, it tells me that you have "mommy" issues. Second, it tells me that you dealt with an extreme amount of rejection in the hands of girls, and later women, that you were interested in as you were growing up through your teenage years and into your adult years.

You never got over that, and it shows with your attitude towards women and others on this forum.

Had you been a real retired "Sergeant Major", you would've taken the time to know the other veterans on this board. You know, like how other retired senior NCOs that I have known have done in other avenues. Had you done that, you would've learned that my mother passed away decades ago.

My father, a Vietnam veteran, a real retired servicemember, raised me, and the military did the rest. It is the result of that upbringing, and military experience, that you are getting hammered with here given your phony claims.

Consistent with your actions on this and on other threads, you act before you think about what you're going to do. That's not a characteristic that is associated with someone that had spent a lot of time in the military, as you would like us to believe in your situation.

" I'm sorry, but you have so much bullshit radiating from you that I highly doubt that the BS that you smell is coming from elsewhere. " Yep, ole " seArgent shitburner " made sure to stand DOWN WIND when he was on the filed latrine " honey pot " burning detail ! With all of those years of shit burning behind him ( and burning shit in front of him ! ) , it's NO wonder that the providers " find excuses " ( his words ) not to see him . They can't make enough Lysol to cover THAT reeking smell !

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Who posted up the "DD forums"?
Who posted about your weight first?
Who posted about your ALLEGED military history first?
Who posted about your medical history first?
Who posted about providers being shocked by your size first?
Who posted your threats to others first?

The fucking list is almost endless .... you remind me of WTF!!

The "founding fathers" crafted the 5th amendment with you two loudmouthed clowns in mind!!! They were brilliant, but you two losers certainly aren't!!

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMM! SHHHHAAAAAAACKKK! + 1,000,000 (multiple times).

Happy fricken early Fourth of July Private! Again.

Private Luke Wyatt plays the victim too much to be someone that was a senior NCO. Had he been the real deal, he'd own up to his fuck ups, and not try to make it like others are after him, or demanding such of him despite the fact that he's the one that initiated it. This is a behavior I'd expect from a private, but not from an NCO.

Here's a skit, from the "Real Life in the Infantry" you tube group of vidoes that remind me of Private Major Luke Wyatt (brown character). Made by infantrymen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yIbrmEtuyo

[herfacechair]

MT Cranial Cavity: I looked into all the comments you made about being an expert at DD-214 and DD-215 forms. I think what you think makes you an expert would

No, all you did was read the fact that I commented over the fact that I could read and interpret the blocks of a DD Form 214. Given the fact that I've been in the military for most of my adult life, with multiple DD Form 214's that I had to check, block by block, for accuracy before signing, yes, I would have firsthand knowledge on looking at these documents to determine if they're fake or not.

MT Cranial Cavity: be you came home with a "Discharge" after spending time with a "Decorator" and your wife gave you "Separation" papers.

Wrong, it's typical of you liberals to pull assumptions out of your asses and run with it as if you liberals are presenting the facts and not spewing crap all over the place, as critical thinking people would actually see you guys do.

My first marriage ended in divorce, I initiated the divorce. My second marriage ended with the natural passing of the spouse. Both women have passed away. As usual, you, along with the other liberals that I have argued with, are colossally wrong about my situation.

MT Cranial Cavity: Do you actually think you can go on and on about what a badass you are

Where, in any of my posts, do I insist that I am a "badass"? Would it hurt you if you were to read my posts with the intention of understanding what I am saying? I generate these posts in a way that even a fifth-grader would understand what I am saying. I know this for fact because I actually had a fifth-grader read an article that I generated using the same level of English used to generate this series of posts.

He understood what he was reading, why couldn't you?

If you have problems understanding what I generated here, on this thread, feel free to hire an interpreter who understands retard who could break this down to you in retard terms so that you could hopefully understand what I am saying.

What I've stated, about myself, are cold hard facts. I don't have to actually "attempt" to do something. Just like the typical liberal you are, you refuse to accept the fact that I have a vantage point in this argument against someone that you support.

MT Cranial Cavity: and convince even one person to trust you with their real world info?

What I actually said:

"I asked him when did he retire, what his MOS was, how many years he served, and where he did his overseas tours at. His first response got defensive and didn't answer any of those questions." -- herfacechair

And this:

"This is why I reached out to him via PM and asked him simple questions that veterans would easily be able to answer. No need to provide PII or any other sensitive information, or documentation, to prove one's military experience. All that's needed is to answer questions, and to engage in conversation the two veterans would have. Where an actual veteran would gladly engage in such conversation, Private Major Luke Wyatt gets defensive and refuses... He sure as hell is getting wrapped around the axle over having to do what real veterans would do in a heartbeat." -- herfacechair

WHERE, in any of those statements, do I demand that I see personal information?

Do you see the part of the quote above that's bolded in red? Or, do you need someone to point that out to you?

"But wait," you might say, "what about when you told him that you wanted to scrutinize his DD Form 214!"

In context:

"First, I asked you the questions first. Until you answer the questions that I have asked you, and follow through the conversation that would naturally result from your answering those questions, you do not have a leg to stand on demanding that I take your offer.

"Second, your offer is invalid on the account that we do not know if the moderator that is chosen is a veteran and, if he/she is a veteran, if this moderator is able to scrutinize a DD Form 214. Again, veteran service organizations have veterans who had been fooled by falsified DD Form 214s. What makes you think that a moderator here would not get fooled?

"Third, verification of your military service, or military background, is more efficiently done via you answering my questions, and following through with the conversation that will result from the answers that you give me." -- herfacechair

Notice that I am rejecting his offer to provide personal information to a moderator. In that same comment, I push for my method, as answering my questions and his following through with a conversation without providing the personal information and verification that he was demanding. I further argue against his insistence on showing DD Form 214s by saying this:

"Unless I can personally verify your DD 214, block by block, your offer is invalid." - herfacechair

Now, read all of that in context. Like a typical liberal, you would rather take what I say, out of context, and insist that I said something that I know for fact I didn't. I'm going to tell you what I told a liberal 11 years ago. If you guys are going to assume what it is that I ment, or pull crap out of your butt about what I've said, you guys might as well respond for me and argue accordingly.

But again, critical thinking, and reading comprehension, are things that you liberals have no use for. You people would much rather be force-fed this information from your propaganda taskmasters.

MT Cranial Cavity: And if they did they would trust you to give it an unbiased evaluation?

Hypothetically, if he were to show me his actual DD Form 214, I would use some of the information to initiate a FOIA request with the National Personal Records Center, and another one to HRC. Once I received the results of those requests, I would come back here and, without providing PII, announce what he actually did as well as point out any irregularities that I found on his DD Form 214.

This would include announcing what military claims he made that are actually false.

One of the things that I do, outside of ECCIE, is work together with a community of veterans who investigate comments and actions as recorded on social media, or elsewhere, for potential stolen valor. This would not be the first time I have done this, nor would it be the last.

I have a folder, in my drawer, containing the results of FOIA's that I've done on potential stolen valor people.

When I reached out to him, the intent was to verify, through veteran to veteran conversation, whether he was a veteran or not. If, through that conversation, I recognize that I'm talking to a veteran, I would have come back and verified that he was a veteran.

He blew that opportunity

MT Cranial Cavity: Look you may be a bad ass from the service but then again you may be a freshman in high school. Who knows or cares.

Who knows? Real veterans on here, who've seen my statements here and elsewhere, know that I'm who I say I am regarding my military experience. I could tell that they're veterans as well, based on their statements and actions. No need to trade PII or DD Form 214s. I tried to get this with Private Lubed Whack Job, but he didn't react the way a real veteran would act.

I haven't been a freshman in high school since the mid 1980s.

Who cares? If that were the case, you wouldn't have had the incentive to jump on here and grace me with your ignorance and colossal lack of analytical abilities.

MT Cranial Cavity: Just act normal for a change.

Destroying you liberals' arguments, and showing you guys how weak your arguments are, and how much you guys lake in the "brain use" category, IS my normal. How about telling that one brain celled activity of yours to quit trying to take you over, and to start doing its job so that you don't type as if a retarded ghost possesses you, before you tell someone to "act normal" for a change?

[herfacechair]

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: +100000 you nailed it - thank you!!!

Your saying that has as much validity as one blind mouse telling another blind mouse that he sees the right direction and that he should be followed.

No, he didn't nail it, not by a long shot. In fact, he missed the mark so much that if his assumption were water, he'd miss the water if he were to fall off a boat in the middle of the lake. In fact, if his assumptions were anything like his marksmanship, I'd hate to be the guy standing behind him as he tries to shoot the target in front of him... That'd be like committing suicide.

The cold hard reality is that he got it WRONG, but you wouldn't recognize that, wouldn't you? I've yet to see you generate a post that's close to being correct or accurate. You've consistently been wrong, including with your claims of being a retired Sergeant Major.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: He either has too much time on his hands

I WISH that I had too much time on my hands. I'd be well underway on completing my doctoral dissertation, and I wouldn't be retiring from the Army if I had "too much time" in my hands.

Don't assume that I'm doing this on a phone, or tablet, and don't assume that I'm typing these posts. Even if I were to type this, I'm a speed typist, a skillset that I learned and used before coming across Dragon Naturally Speaking speech to text software.

What also helps is that both, phony veterans, and liberals, argue from the same playbook, and practically say the same things, from one person to another. It's like coming across the 1000th person, that tells me that 1+1 = 11, and I counter that by saying, "2".

What you guys have said here, others have said elsewhere across the 13 years I have debated against you liberals in the past few years I've debated against you phonies. It doesn't take long to reply at that point.

So no, I don't have plenty of time on my hands. However, I chose to make time to go after valor thieves like you.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: or is the biggest ass clown on ECCIE

You call anybody, that destroys you in debate, as an "ass clown". I'd rather have you erroneously call me that than to actually be a valor thief, and a liberal that does not know what he is talking about, like what I see with you.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: if he thinks myself or anyone else is obligated to give up personal info on a fucking whore board. This isn't a military forum - I don't have to prove a damn thing to him

Your actual statements prove otherwise:

"I offered you two options look me up in the database in St Louis or present our respective DD 214" -- Private Major Luke_Wyatt

"Just like I told you FUCK OFF or accept my offer" -- Private Major Luke_Wyatt

By saying that I accept your offer, to show my DD Form 214 to a moderator on this board, or "fuck off", you're obligating me to give up personal info "on a fucking whore board".

But wait! There's more! You said this on another thread, to someone else that doubted your claims, before you and I got into this debate:

"How about we each send a mOD a copy of our DD-214 or 215 and see who the real liar is you POS -- Private Major Luke_Wyatt

If you didn't have to prove a damn thing, why the insistence that we both show our DD Form 214s to a moderator here? As I pointed out to the guy who has his MT Cranial Cavity up your ass, my method involves you answering questions veterans would easily be able to understand, and following that up with a conversation that veterans would easily have. No personal information is given... if you were a retired SGM, you'd know that, and would welcome such questions and exchange like a real veteran would.

But, you wouldn't, and you're getting defensive about it, because you know deep down that you're a valor thief, and that such a conversation would expose you for what you really are.

Private Major Luke_Wyatt: - it's absurd as if a hobbyist stated that he were a millionaire and I asked him to show me his bank account or financial records to prove he's a millionaire. (Inductive Fallacy: Strawman)

First, you're the one that is demanding a showing of DD Form 214s to a moderator, not me. However, when I put in the caveat that I be able to scrutinize every block of your so-called DD Form 214, all of a sudden it becomes an issue of not having to prove anything to anybody on this board.

Again, my requirement simply requires you to answer questions that veterans could easily answer. Then, based on that, the following requirement is that we engage in a conversation that veterans would engage in.

You are adamantly afraid of doing this simple method of verification, one that does not require the exchange of personal information. You insisted on a showing of DD Form 214s, that is, until I insist that if there was a case of showing a DD Form 214 to a moderator, that I be able to scrutinize every block of the form that you show.

Your refusal to answer simple questions that veterans could answer speaks volumes to the fact that you are not who you claim to be regarding military service.

Again, this isn't a conversation/argument regarding a topic that millionaires would have an advantage on. You pulled the phony veteran card in a thread where you felt that gave you an advantage relative to the opposition. Real veterans, among the opposition, called you out before I even jumped in and questioned the nature of your military service.

[herfacechair]

Private Major Luke_Wyattt: Go see one of your 50 dollar massage tramps- have you ever paid more than 100 dollars for a session?

Says the guy that bitches, whines, moans and groans about a woman who'd take his money despite his weight, then turns around and wonders if his weight would be an issue to other providers given the negative reaction he received from yet other providers that see him.

It doesn't matter if he's not paying that much for a session or not, at least another woman is making him nut compared to you nutting in your socks in your mother's basement.

Private Major Luke_Wyattt: I am going to assume you have a low paying job - or you just a cheapskate.

Says the guy who's posting time stamps on here suggests that he has plenty of time on his hands due to his potentially not having a job.

Private Major Luke_Wyattt: Until you send me a copy of your pay stub I will believe that you have a minimum wage job based on the little money you spend seeing hookers

Take it away Private Major Luke Wyatt:

"He either has too much time on his hands or is the biggest ass clown on ECCIE if he thinks myself or anyone else is obligated to give up personal info on a fucking whore board. This isn't a military forum -- I don't have to prove a damn thing to him" -- Luke Wyatt

Let's adjust that a little bit:

"Private Luke Wyatt either has too much time on his hands or is the biggest ass clown on ECCIE if Private Luke Wyatt thinks lustylad or anyone else is obligated to give up personal info on a fucking whore board. This isn't a job forum -- lustylad don't have to prove a damn thing to Private Luke Wyatt"

Back at you.

Private Major Luke_Wyattt: - so to take a page out of HFC's book show evidence that you make more than minimum wage.

Actually, you're the one that demanded that I accept your offer, which involves my showing personal information to a moderator on this board (DD Form 214) or that I "fuck off".

My evidence gathering involves a simple conversation that veterans would easily engage in, one that you don't want to engage in because you know that you'd truly be exposed as a military fraud WITHOUT the need to provide personal information.

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hey fatboy, you've been offering to prove your military service bona fides to this board for months, but when someone whose service background is obvious calls you out for the fraud you are, you whine that you don't have to prove anything?

Make up your mind, "Seargent"!

Seargent, BWAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAA! It's like that phony SEAL "contractor" that claimed to be a "SeAL".

This is how Private Major Luke_Wyatt comes across to me when he refuses to answer my questions, and to engage in the follow on conversation that veterans would easily do:

I refuse to answer any further questions about my nonexistent military service because I didn't serve. You people simply want to mock me so I refuse to participate with these questionings any further. -- Luke_Wyatt fixed statement

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

I have no problem proving it to him but it's going to cost him - I am not going to offer that info just to ease his curiosity - if he's so confident let him put his membership on the line - I even offered the same deal to you guys.

Take it away Private Major Luke Wyatt:

"He either has too much time on his hands or is the biggest ass clown on ECCIE if he thinks myself or anyone else is obligated to give up personal info on a fucking whore board. This isn't a military forum – I don't have to prove a damn thing to him" – Luke Wyatt

But, we could quickly, and easily, clear this all up if you simply answered the questions I asked you, then followed through with the conversation that we'd engage in like two veterans would normally do. No personal information traded, no documents sent to people "on a whore board", none of that.

Again, I don't want you to leave the forum, so why would I accept a deal that involves you leaving? Your offer is invalid. All you have to do is answer my questions, then engage in the conversation that follows, like what real veterans would do. Your refusal to do so speaks volumes to the fact that you're not who you claim to be.

[lustylad]

Ok, that was less than 60 minutes of sustained carpet bombing of Private Major FatAss and MT Cranial Cavity....

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by herfacechair

Are you sure that said round wouldn't bounce back up? He has a cartoon in his honor.

OMG you just outed Lubed WhinyAss! He's Johnny b the You Tube Fatty!

[dilbert firestorm]

wow... HFC is on a roll. he's like a B-52 on steroids.

[Yssup Rider]

So is he Humpty, Marshal or JL?

Or is it John Cornyn?

Regardless, his verbose ass has been on ignore since before his last "flare-up."