Mueller Report Finished: Trump Guilty of Colusion

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Adam Schiff has been concealing EVIDENCE from a Federal criminal investigation.

18 U.S. Code § 1519.
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Or .... like all the other SocialistLiberalAntiTrumpers .... HE'S BEEN LYING.

Trump 'repeatedly tears up official documents' that should be preserved, leaving staff to tape them back together | The Independent

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8392856.html

[SecretE]

Originally Posted by themystic

Its official. Trump Guilty as Fuck

Guilty of being a choir boy in a sea of DC sinners. LOL.

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by themystic

Its official. Trump Guilty as Fuck

Apparently you cannot read like the rest of us...


No evidence of collusion.


No evidence of obstruction.


Now....lets start sending democrats to prison for this travesty.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by texassapper

Apparently you cannot read like the rest of us...


No evidence of collusion.


No evidence of obstruction.


Now....lets start sending democrats to prison for this travesty.

Attorney General Barr might be getting ready to do just that.

[bb1961]

I hope the next investigative is the bogus FISA warrant.
I hope you feel the same about this investigation TM/SC.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by texassapper

No evidence of obstruction.

meuller took a pass on that one.

He didn't say there was obstruction or no obstruction.

apparently Meuler thought going there was dodgy, noting the problems with indicting a sitting president or not.

apparently he left that question to DA Barr.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

meuller took a pass on that one.

He didn't say there was obstruction or no obstruction.

apparently Meuler thought going there was dodgy, noting the problems with indicting a sitting president or not.

apparently he left that question to DA Barr.

Yeah, Mueller suddenly decided that he actually stuck to his mandate to investigate Russian collusion after going to any and all lengths to try and come up with other charges.

I actually almost feel bad for the guy not coming through with that "gotcha" the libs were so hoping for.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

meuller took a pass on that one.

He didn't say there was obstruction or no obstruction.

apparently Meuler thought going there was dodgy, noting the problems with indicting a sitting president or not.

apparently he left that question to DA Barr.

Err... someone please explain to me how there can be obstruction of justice if there is no crime? Logically, if there is no crime to be uncovered by an investigation, then acting to impede that investigation is not obstructing justice. Unless you want to argue that justice is served by exonerating the subject of the investigation. But then you would be accusing trump of blocking his own exoneration.

Methinks it's an injustice to taxpayers to spend $35 million investigating a non-crime!

[Austin Ellen]

Lusty, I'm watching CBS this morning. And someone is saying that same,exact thing. I not a lawyer (and I don't play one one T.V. either) but even I know this. Lol

Originally Posted by lustylad

Err... someone please explain to me how there can be obstruction of justice if there is no crime? Logically, if there is no crime to be uncovered by an investigation, then acting to impede that investigation is not obstructing justice. Unless you want to argue that justice is served by exonerating the subject of the investigation. But then you would be accusing trump of blocking his own exoneration.

Methinks it's an injustice to taxpayers to spend $35 million investigating a non-crime!

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Err... someone please explain to me how there can be obstruction of justice if there is no crime? Logically, if there is no crime to be uncovered by an investigation, then acting to impede that investigation is not obstructing justice. Unless you want to argue that justice is served by exonerating the subject of the investigation. But then you would be accusing trump of blocking his own exoneration.

Methinks it's an injustice to taxpayers to spend $35 million investigating a non-crime!

You do recall there have been quite a few folks tied to Trump indicted over crimes they committed for Trump.
He has done his best to protect them knowing they were guilty. So I would say there is a good chance he has broken the law defending them. If for no other reason he is too stupid to know what the law is.


Methinks it is an injustice to not know the facts about the cost of the investigation. LOL!

Another point in favor of theory No. 2: As of September, the fiscal cost of the Mueller investigation was roughly $0.00. By that point, the probe had spent roughly $26 million. But, by striking a plea agreement with Paul Manafort for his myriad white-collar crimes — an agreement that required Trump’s former campaign manager to forfeit five multi-million-dollar properties, a life-insurance policy, and the contents of multiple bank accounts — Mueller’s investigation had acquired somewhere between $26 million and $42 million worth of revenue for the federal treasury.

The Mueller probe’s (apparent) profitability is indicative of more than just Donald Trump’s mendacity: It also reflects the fact that there are few forms of law enforcement more cost-efficient than cracking down on super-rich tax cheats and money launderers. And yet, for some strange reason, the federal law enforcement has not made punishing the financial malfeasance of the super-rich a top-tier priority.

[winn dixie]

^^^^^^ Still grasping at straws! Ohh i'am sorry. You libs want to ban straws! ooops

[Redhot1960]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ge-1/#comments

[bamscram]

Looks like the far right and Trump owes Muller an apology for slandering him .
He did his job in a professional manner , and was even easy on the orange dildo.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by bamscram

Looks like the far right and Trump owes Muller an apology for slandering him .
He did his job in a professional manner , and was even easy on the orange dildo.

There never was a crime so how did Mueller go easy on him.

[Redhot1960]

Glenn Greenwald
‏
Verified account

@ggreenwald
Follow Follow @ggreenwald
More
A short two-minute video for those of you in the media pitifully insisting that no media reckoning is needed and journalists performed beautifully, soberly and responsibly throughout this whole saga:

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/statu...24294048899072