What is the point to including Conversation as a review activity?

[jackdanielscowboy]

Yes good conversation shows that she is taking an interest and simetimes will get a little more personal to make it feel like a true gfe. Hence how i know true occuaption of a couple girls seen.

[endurance]

"if you have to ask, you'll never understand"

:-)

[Codybeast]

Originally Posted by endurance

"if you have to ask, you'll never understand"

:-)

Interesting comment. Sounds deep but non applicable. The question wasn't whether conversation skill was valuable but why it needed to be listed as an activity.

Based upon the responses I commented that I now had a better understanding as to the answer.

Now you come up with a jab basically just to prove you're a ..... OK so you've introduced yourself. Now we know who you are. Welcome.

[GneissGuy]

Well, some ladies have less personality than a blowup doll.

I like a lady who can carry on a discussion, although I don't want that to get in the way of the other activities when I'm ready.

If I'm just looking for slippery friction between mucous membranes, I can just stay home with tissues and lotion.

[davidsmith0123]

I am definitely one of those clients who wants a provider to be a good conversationalist, someone who is smart enough, and mature enough, to carry on an interesting discussions on a variety of issues during interludes. And I typically book longer appointments, so there are interludes.

It goes without saying that anyone booking a provider for a business engagement or formal evening event would definitely want to know about conversation skills. Think about certain provider posts you have read and consider taking such a poster to a business event! It could have all the makings of a good comedy, and funny to everyone except you.

That said, I understand Cody's point -- why list conversation? Especially because anyone can claim it, and it has so many dimensions and means so many different things. I much prefer to notice that the woman is a good conversationalist -- in my judgement, with respect to the dimensions I care about -- by examining her posts. (And that, gentlemen, is one big reason why I much prefer when these boards are friendly to the ladies -- I want to encourage their posts, to see how they communicate and decide for myself. Put differently, I want to judge the 'book' by the words as well as the pictures -- lol.)

[endurance]

Lighten up francis.

It is applicable because if you couldn't figure that out yourself (that guys could possibly care about verbal interaction as part of the IOP or whatever) then you probably will only superficially understand based on a messageboard post.

If you're that easily offended, don't ask derisive questions that make it seem like everyone else is overthinking it when you are actually the one overthinking it.

Originally Posted by Codybeast

Interesting comment. Sounds deep but non applicable. The question wasn't whether conversation skill was valuable but why it needed to be listed as an activity.

Based upon the responses I commented that I now had a better understanding as to the answer.

Now you come up with a jab basically just to prove you're a ..... OK so you've introduced yourself. Now we know who you are. Welcome.

[Codybeast]

Originally Posted by endurance

Lighten up francis.

It is applicable because if you couldn't figure that out yourself (that guys could possibly care about verbal interaction as part of the IOP or whatever) then you probably will only superficially understand based on a messageboard post.

If you're that easily offended, don't ask derisive questions that make it seem like everyone else is overthinking it when you are actually the one overthinking it.

Bottom line is rather than simply give constructive input or even an answer all you were capable of was to throw out a single line sarcastic quip directed at the OP for putting the topic out there.

You can blow all the diversionary smoke you want and cry that the OP is just being defensive etc. but basically your response was that of someone trying to be an ass.

I could be wrong about you trying as sometimes it just comes naturally for some.

And my name isn't Francis. It's Shirley.

[Sire]

You mean, we can fuck them too?

Dammit! I've been going about this all wrong.

[Codybeast]

Once again to clarify the thread Question which I thought was perfectly clear.

I agree that an intelligent provider capable of stimulating conversation is a major factor in making a session memorable.

I agree with most of the comments above and have always shared that sentiment.

The thread topic is "What is the point to including Convo as a review activity?

The Point being dumb providers like to talk alot and will gab the entire hour if you let him.

Intelligent providers like to talk but usually say something worth hearing thus invoking a stimulating dialogue.

I still think that the generality of Convo as an activity tells me nothing other than she is capable of talking. I have never run across a provider who didn't converse in a session like some blowup doll.

Some conversations added to the human exchange experience and others made me smile, nod and stick my dick in her mouth to keep it occupied.

In essence I think either every review should include Convo as an activity because there is always convo in a session stimulating or not or it should never be listed for the same reason and because it's tells us absolutely nothing of value.

Start describing the conversation as stimulating, humorous, playful, deep, intelligent, bland, etc. and then readers know what to expect.

[fun2come]

Originally Posted by Codybeast

Start describing the conversation as stimulating, intelligent, bland, etc. and listing it makes sense.

I'll try to remember this for future Reviews. Probably want the adjective listed in the Activity section, yes?

BTW, best convo is when she talks to the little head, most stimulating

[Toyz]

Originally Posted by fun2come

VL, good for you, easy money :-))))

Which reminds me of a joke F2C.

Jeffrey Dahmer and Lorena Bobbitt are having lunch...Jeffrey says to Lorena, "Excuse me, but are you going to eat that"?

{{{wait for it}}}

[VictoriaLyn]

Originally Posted by Toyz

Which reminds me of a joke F2C.

Jeffrey Dahmer and Lorena Bobbitt are having lunch...Jeffrey says to Lorena, "Excuse me, but are you going to eat that"?

{{{wait for it}}}

[VictoriaLyn]

Originally Posted by fun2come

VL, good for you, easy money :-))))

While you would think so it is far from that with one of em....there are somethings that happen in a persons day that I just really dont need to know ever never and I swear I can feel my IQ points running away...Don't get me wrong I am far from complaining...

[Codybeast]

Originally Posted by VictoriaLyn

While you would think so it is far from that with one of em....there are somethings that happen in a persons day that I just really dont need to know ever never and I swear I can feel my IQ points running away

I hope he's not reading this.

[VictoriaLyn]

Originally Posted by Codybeast

I hope he's not reading this.

He is and knows I am joking