Hypothetical Question

[CryptKicker]

{MOD hat off---}

I'm going to disagree some here. The review system is designed to give good and bad about a provider. As long as the reviewer is giving the negative from the factual side and not from a personal conflict side, then those reviews should be in public in the review forum (with the appropriate ROS privacy). If a lady suddenly is off her game and giving crap service then I want a review about it. If a lady starts a NSNC string it needs to be posted. Some of these ladies that give bad service and NSNC need to know we are not afraid to post about it. It won't hurt their income if they correct the problems and if they don't correct it, do we honestly care about their income?

[bigcockpussylicker]

Originally Posted by malwoody

I wonder how people feel about a guy who writes a glowing review with a yes recommendation and then proceeds to go behind the providers back to talk shit about her. Easy to surmise that he is a cowardly hypocrite but what bothers me more is the adverse effect said activity can have on her livelihood..

Personally I think such behavior is grounds for some form of discipline..
Not nice to fuck with someones...ability to make a living..

nope
what he says in the review is his "sworn" statement. What he says outside the review doesn't matter/his own business and he can say whatever he wants to say, you don't know why he's talking smack in his personal life, maybe he doesnt want her to be busy so he can see her more, etc

what you are talking about reminds me of the Sterling case. A man is about to get his 2nd NAACP award says someshit and everyone jumps all over his personal comments and not the actions he took to get his SECOND Award
actions>>words

[MsElena]

Originally Posted by Gemma34

Well, except if it's about Kaylen.

Talk about creating drama.


My clients don't see her whether those clients are in KC or Omaha, so they don't talk to me about her. Quite frankly, the guys on the board don't talk to me about her because they know I'm not fond of her.

You seem to have an issue with me Gemma. You keep trying to take shots at me. If you have an issue with me, spit it out. If not, keep your catty remarks directed at some other person.

[stimulatethemind]

Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

nope
what he says in the review is his "sworn" statement. What he says outside the review doesn't matter/his own business and he can say whatever he wants to say, you don't know why he's talking smack in his personal life, maybe he doesnt want her to be busy so he can see her more, etc

what you are talking about reminds me of the Sterling case. A man is about to get his 2nd NAACP award says someshit and everyone jumps all over his personal comments and not the actions he took to get his SECOND Award
actions>>words

So, if I'm reading your post correctly, what you are saying is that it's acceptable to write a fraudulent review for whatever reason (just as an example, let's say trying to inflate your P411 OK's)? I don't believe that most of the guys on here would agree with that. Doesn't the integrity of the review system depend on HONEST sharing of information? If I misread your thoughts, please enlighten me.

[Guest013121]

*Note to Self* Me responding to a comment Elena posted is creating drama. Got it!

Spitting it out.... I honestly think you forget what you say to people. And I usually try to ignore it. Just wondering how you can contradict yourself on a thread in which fakeness is the subject!!??

[CryptKicker]

Originally Posted by stimulatethemind

So, if I'm reading your post correctly, what you are saying is that it's acceptable to write a fraudulent review for whatever reason (just as an example, let's say trying to inflate your P411 OK's)? I don't believe that most of the guys on here would agree with that. Doesn't the integrity of the review system depend on HONEST sharing of information? If I misread your thoughts, please enlighten me.

Almost all reviews would seem to have something fraudulent in them. Most of seem to over exaggerate our abilities on a regular basis. You have to take every review and throw out some of the obvious BS to come up with what actually happened.

[malwoody]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

{MOD hat off---}

I'm going to disagree some here. The review system is designed to give good and bad about a provider. As long as the reviewer is giving the negative from the factual side and not from a personal conflict side, then those reviews should be in public in the review forum (with the appropriate ROS privacy). If a lady suddenly is off her game and giving crap service then I want a review about it. If a lady starts a NSNC string it needs to be posted. Some of these ladies that give bad service and NSNC need to know we are not afraid to post about it. It won't hurt their income if they correct the problems and if they don't correct it, do we honestly care about their income?

Oh I agree and you really are not disagreeing...
Had nothing to do with performance, NCNS, etc...

Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

what you are talking about reminds me of the Sterling case.

Thank you so much for pointing out who the mythical hypocrite reminds me of.. Nice to know you empathize with Mr Sterling..while you're at it, what was/are your previous handle(s) ?

[stimulatethemind]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Almost all reviews would seem to have something fraudulent in them. Most of seem to over exaggerate our abilities on a regular basis. You have to take every review and throw out some of the obvious BS to come up with what actually happened.

Completely agree, CK. I sometimes marvel at the sexual prowess of some of the reviewers. However, I believe that what the OP was primarily referring to was a situation where a glowing review was posted and then the provider was trashed by the reviewer in a private forum. I believe that's a different situation.

[malwoody]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Almost all reviews would seem to have something fraudulent in them. Most of seem to over exaggerate our abilities on a regular basis. .

Speak for yourself...I can almost always climb the ladder within the allotted time frame....

That is why I need at least a couple of hours...besides, if my chosen victim that day has seen any of the ever growing group of the turbo endowed recently, I need to go easy anyway..

[super_delfin00]

You can have a good session, which results in a good review, yet still think the provider is a knob. I'd give someone like Dixie/Georgia Southe a good review, because in session, she's generally on her game. The problem is, all the other crap that surrounds her, at times will lead me to question the ability to get to the appt without drama.

[ElumEno]

Originally Posted by malwoody

..while you're at it, what was/are your previous handle(s) ?

Been wondering that myself, but one thing is for sure.
He is not as sharp as a Blade.

[CryptKicker]

It is and I know of what he speaks (I think). When the difference between the review and what is said in private is extremely opposite then that is not a good thing. Too many folks won't see the info in the private forum. It could also be that the glowing review was legit but something happened after the visit or on a subsequent quick return visit that soured the gent. That could have been either or both parties fault.

I have no problem with giving a lady a "good" review in order to not hurt her feelings but then being a little more harsh in private. It's when it is extreme that there is an issue or another issue that needs to be explored.

[malwoody]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

It is and I know of what he speaks (I think). When the difference between the review and what is said in private is extremely opposite then that is not a good thing. Too many folks won't see the info in the private forum. It could also be that the glowing review was legit but something happened after the visit or on a subsequent quick return visit that soured the gent. That could have been either or both parties fault.

I have no problem with giving a lady a "good" review in order to not hurt her feelings but then being a little more harsh in private. It's when it is extreme that there is an issue or another issue that needs to be explored.

Yeah it's all well and good when two different apples are being discussed..

My hypothetical was speaking more of apples and oranges..

[MsElena]

Originally Posted by Gemma34

*Note to Self* Me responding to a comment Elena posted is creating drama. Got it!

Spitting it out.... I honestly think you forget what you say to people. And I usually try to ignore it. Just wondering how you can contradict yourself on a thread in which fakeness is the subject!!??

No, you bringing up a person's name to try to make some point is creating drama. No one mentioned her name or even eluded to her except you.

I have no problems with my memory.

I've said what I wanted to say to you. I'm not going to hijack the thread. If you want to continue this, my PM's are open.

[dirty dog]

Originally Posted by ElumEno

Been wondering that myself, but one thing is for sure.
He is not as sharp as a Blade.

There was another guy on the board back at the time blade was getting in trouble, young kid, hated fat people, got himself banned pretty quick. Used to agree with MexMex a lot.