Guys- How Many of You Dont Hobby but Still Get on The Board? What Are You Doing on The Board?

[Bob McV]

Originally Posted by Scarlett De Rossi

1. Here for the spank material?
2. Looking for your next appointment? Researching the next girls you want to see?
3. Purely for the entertainment value?

Please, illuminate me. I'm curious.

Hmm interesting question. I imagine there are as many reasons for reading this board as there are stars. Personally as someone that is terribly curious about the sex work and related topics I see it being a great source of information and entertainment with or without booking any appointments.

Originally Posted by rockerrick

Good question?
Seems to be too much dead weight hanging around.
IMO contribute hobby experiences or get the fuck out!

Originally Posted by rockerrick

A person doesn't care!
If you are not contributing information on escorts you are worthless to all on Eccie.
Escort Client Community Information Exchange
It's in the name.

Fuck all worthless lurkers!

dead weight? please explain? What are they weighing down? How is it costing you or anyone time or energy to have someone lurk? you have no idea they are there as far as I can tell.

Why should someone stop reading if they aren't posting reviews and/or providing other information? they take up 0 space.

The definition if an exchange is only met when someone takes what is offered. So if nobody was reading what is posted then there isn't much of an exchange is there?

Originally Posted by amoryb

Some people on this board take themselves waaaaay too seriously. Being angry at lurkers is ridiculous in the extreme

I have to agree.

Originally Posted by ck1942

Interesting questions raised and good ones, too, but not as complete as I would have asked.

Pretty much, most of the providers here, and male reviewers, are here for the obvious -- hookups.

And there are those wannabe but not yet with a toe in the water providers and hobbyists.

And, well, there are both males and females who are lurkers and LURKERS. The lurkers usually are doing some research, and the LURKERS are maybe a little closer to getting a toe into the water.

And, of course, do not forget, much less respond, to the

TROLLS

who are here neither to play or pay, but to disrupt imho.

There is some overlap in the categories you list but I agree with the general motivations.


The vocal minority of this site (both male and female) is just that a minority. of the currently 10744 logged in users how man do you think are active? 2000? While it would be interesting to pull stats on the reasoning behind reading this forum, I posit that it is ultimately of no consequence.

[gacgacgac2678]

Wow...Rod's a dick

[rockerrick]

Who's Rod dumbass?
Another fucking idiot, get some glasses so you don't look so fucking stupid!


@ Bob, maybe parasitic bloodsucking leeches is more appropriate? Living off the intelligence of others all the while bitching like a bunch of bleeding little twats.

Still Looking, maybe we should organize a bunch of high reviewers to start spreading misinformation in the reviews, cost these fucking leeches some serious dough?

[David.Douchehurst]

Ah cums h'yar fer the comp'lmentry cont'nental breakfust. It's a reel treet fer those incontinent amungst us laik me.

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by rockerrick

Still Looking, maybe we should organize a bunch of high reviewers to start spreading misinformation in the reviews, cost these fucking leeches some serious dough?

[Mr Peabody]

1)
3)
4) Been too busy to hobby locally; only on vaca

I also come here to get compliments how pretty I am.

[Toyz]

Originally Posted by Scarlett De Rossi

1. Here for the spank material?
2. Looking for your next appointment? Researching the next girls you want to see?
3. Purely for the entertainment value?

Please, illuminate me. I'm curious.

Spank material?

I don't think I've seen a single picture worthy of that lofty praise on eccie.

Certainly some nice pics...and sometimes some pretty girls...but overall very "R" rated stuff.

[amoryb]

Originally Posted by rockerrick

@ Bob, maybe parasitic bloodsucking leeches is more appropriate?


Again, you're tsking yourself waaaaaaaaay too seriously. There's just no reason for you to be this angry over certain members' lack of reviews.

Living off the intelligence of others all the while bitching like a bunch of bleeding little twats.

This is actually pretty funny. Because it obviously takes a great deal of intelligence to bang a chick for $, then write a few paragraphs about it. You and I have different definitions of intelligence.

Still Looking, maybe we should organize a bunch of high reviewers to start spreading misinformation in the reviews, cost these fucking leeches some serious dough?

Interesting idea. I believe the mods might have something to say about intentionally writing misleading reviews. Perhaps they'll chime in soon but I think you've got a winner. Thanks Rod, you're definitely an asset to the board.

[Toyz]

Originally Posted by amoryb

Interesting idea. I believe the mods might have something to say about intentionally writing misleading reviews. Perhaps they'll chime in soon but I think you've got a winner. Thanks Rod, you're definitely an asset to the board.

Uh...I think its already being done? Surely no one believes all the BS about "She had never had a single orgasm in her life, but I made her cum 37.5 times in a one hour session"...

if anyone is believing the contents of the reviews...well...

[amoryb]

True, but here we have Rod suggesting the creation of a conspiracy of false reviews to strike back at those non-reviewing bastards. Bit of a distinction there.

[rrousseau]

Originally Posted by rockerrick

Who's Rod dumbass?
Another fucking idiot, get some glasses so you don't look so fucking stupid!

Wow! He does not like being called Rod, does he? I wonder why that is?

Way to telegraph how to push your buttons, Rod!

[rockerrick]

Not false reviews dipshit, appointments will occur, how I and others decide to tell our story is up to us.
Everyone's experiences are different.
You'll just be lead to warmed over dog meat that we shall tell you is hot! How many reviews of real bowzers have you read a guy say she's beautiful?
No more pics in reviews gor leeches to feed off.
Lurkers beware shit is about to get real interesting for the leeches!
How do you like that Ameba?
Now what the fuck are you and your lower I mean lurker buddies gonna do about it?
No guidelines broken, just your fucking wallets.

[rockerrick]

Originally Posted by rrousseau

Wow! He does not like being called Rod, does he? I wonder why that is?

Way to telegraph how to push your buttons, Rod!

That's Hot Long Thick Rod to you fag!
Doesn't bother me that you're a blind imbecile.
Comes with the territory of being an old fat man.

[amoryb]

Wow, writing something that isn't true is pretty much the definition of false. False means lying. Look it up.

Also, lurkers generally can't see pics posted in reviews. That is, unless they've paid for premium access. But then they wouldn't be leeches, would they?

You really need to take a step back and review your little theories, Rod. They don't hold up to even casual scrutiny.

[rockerrick]

As Toyz pointed out earlier, all reviews are lies.
Yeah they never get posted in the threads.
But the dumbfucks sure read physical descriptions huh?