Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

RaiderFrank · 10-13-2015, 10:57 AM

"I've now seen this (Amazing, fantasy, atf) goddess 3 times now and just had to write a review"

I feel like a review of a girl that has been seen once is really helpful, but when it's a repeated visit, the review is from likely from someone who is more attached to the provider than to helping the client.

Just sayin.... maybe I am wrong?

joeschmoe90 · 10-13-2015, 11:07 AM

I agree somewhat, but it also let's us know how the provider treats repeat clients

Twain · 10-13-2015, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeschmoe90

I agree somewhat, but it also let's us know how the provider treats repeat clients

True. I read here often that the service gets better the more often you see the lady.

Unfortunately, this excuse is also used as a ruse by the provider to get you to come back with hopes that the "next" visit will be more gfe.

RaiderFrank · 10-13-2015, 11:32 AM

My thinking is that reviews are mostly for a first time visitor to get an idea. The margin for error on a third or more visit makes those reviews basically wothless. YMMV becomes HUGE at that point.

Phrasing · 10-13-2015, 11:37 AM

Only if there is something that changed or increased....
Maybe she will allow bbbj after seeing someone twice
or IOP gets really really good after a few visits.
But if it is the same shit different day...then it is useless.
However, maybe I WK sometimes...but if I haven't seen a provider been mentioned in a while and I see them....whether it was my 5th time...I will review them

joeschmoe90 · 10-13-2015, 12:29 PM

I agree with that. The level of service may change after a given time. Good or bad

LongTimeMonger · 10-13-2015, 12:31 PM

I think repeat reviews by the same person are good for showing consistency of a provider, which does help me decide if I want to see her. Inconsistency is a killer for me.

john_deere · 10-13-2015, 12:40 PM

no, it's not fair.

you should be skeptical of all reviews.

duh.

RaiderFrank · 10-13-2015, 06:41 PM

I'm only skeptical of those and a John Deere Review special. (smirk)

john_deere · 10-13-2015, 09:57 PM

inorite?

i do tend to exaggerate, like, a million times a day.

RaiderFrank · 10-13-2015, 11:51 PM

I see what you did there..... NIIIIIIIIIIICE.....!

Rose Vintage · 10-14-2015, 11:58 AM

I say a review is just a general idea, some people click differently with others due to personalities. Not every experience can be the exact same.

Guest020617-1 · 10-16-2015, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_deere

no, it's not fair.

you should be skeptical of all reviews.

duh.

True words indeed. A part of that is being familiar with the source too, and that is a lot more subtle than it might appear. For example, I have certainly given "yes" recommendations where, if you read the bulk of my reviews, the sessions I really enjoyed, that was clear from the review. Others might therefore be more properly understood to be damned with faint praise. Similarly, a certain level of honestly in complete disclosure, noting missteps-my own as well as those of the provider-as well as high notes are important.

I have given "yes" recommendations where only the most S&M among us would go.

That is why honesty and accuracy and a significant level of detail is important in every review, because WALDT and YMMV are always the rule. But if I am looking at visiting someone I have never seen before, and that provider is a known commodity, I will always spend as much time researching the reviewer as I do the provider.

This is only a SWMB, but I have always considered and evaluated the reputation of any writer for the reviews I find interesting.

john_deere · 10-16-2015, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wallance

True words indeed. A part of that is being familiar with the source too, and that is a lot more subtle than it might appear. For example, I have certainly given "yes" recommendations where, if you read the bulk of my reviews, the sessions I really enjoyed, that was clear from the review. Others might therefore be more properly understood to be damned with faint praise. Similarly, a certain level of honestly in complete disclosure, noting missteps-my own as well as those of the provider-as well as high notes are important.

I have given "yes" recommendations where only the most S&M among us would go.

That is why honesty and accuracy and a significant level of detail is important in every review, because WALDT and YMMV are always the rule. But if I am looking at visiting someone I have never seen before, and that provider is a known commodity, I will always spend as much time researching the reviewer as I do the provider.

This is only a SWMB, but I have always considered and evaluated the reputation of any writer for the reviews I find interesting.