Recorded Sessions?

[Tony Gambino]

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Knock yourself out man. Hell I'll forward it myself. You think I'm shy about defending my actions in modtardville? I assure you I am not.

Also, don't mischaracterize what I said. I said "If it's true". We have no way of determining whether it really is or not. I've not lost sight of that fact even if the court of public opinion has.

post ALL our pms!! I good with that....it was determined papi was a creeper and you still protected his ass....point the guy that points out a danger to our ladies and even our guys....because your that much smarter than me.....your right he;s ok no problem here.....what was I thinking?
you have my permission to post any PM related to this thread.......ANY PM related.......of course if our PM's mentioned me insulting papi, yeah probably not that one.....why insult a paying member just screen saved this thread

I think im going to log all our discussions and this entire thread and send it to an andmin, or STChris...aind see if i'm outta line....or if the mods are protecting a creeper......I already did screen caps on all our pms.......lets see if if recording , bbfs creepers deserve the protection they got here.......

[SpiceItUp]

Originally Posted by Tony Gambino

post ALL our pms!! I good with that....it was determined papi was a creeper and you still protected his ass....point the guy that points out a danger to our ladies and even our guys....because your that much smarter than me.....your right he;s ok no problem here.....what was I thinking?
you have my permission to post any PM related to this thread.......ANY PM related.......of course if our PM's mentioned me insulting papi, yeah probably not that one.....why insult a paying member just screen saved this thread

I think im going to log all our discussions and this entire thread and send it to an andmin, or STChris...aind see if i'm outta line....or if the mods are protecting a creeper......I already did screen caps on all our pms.......lets see if if recording , bbfs creepers deserve the protection they got here.......

Every member gets the same protections even those whose alleged actions I find distasteful.

Houston forums are about as much of a free-for-all as you can get outside of outright anarchy. We like to treat people as adults who are free to express themselves and don't try to create a nanny state where no one is ever offended. However, we do have to draw the line somewhere.

I'm finished discussing the matter with you here. If you'd like to start a thread about the tyranny of Htown mods or send whatever to whomever you like then go for it. Let's not derail this particular thread any further shall we?

[Tony Gambino]

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Every member gets the same protections even those whose alleged actions I find distasteful.

Houston forums are about as much of a free-for-all as you can get outside of outright anarchy. We like to treat people as adults who are free to express themselves and don't try to create a nanny state where no one is ever offended. However, we do have to draw the line somewhere.

I'm finished discussing the matter with you here. If you'd like to start a thread about the tyranny of Htown mods or send whatever to whomever you like then go for it. Let's not derail this particular thread any further shall we?

wouldn't want to make your homie PAPI look bad.....you got his back, I get it sorry I brought it up..........why we peasants bring things like this up..........I mean we don't have clout like papi, he really can do as he pleases.......and why not??? he has money, according to him...sorry master

and if his reviews, and ratings put members in danger......I should just shutee!
totally get it, even when young welcome wagon ladies have a complaint....ill tow the line here sir.........

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

An attempt to get BBFS is no big deal. Happens all the time, every day. .

Originally Posted by Pistolero

Natalia, I understand what you are saying. And agree with you.

What I was trying to convey was that asking other providers was not going to help his case.

Some guy trying to BB and slipping off the condom is a constant topic around here. Every day. It is not a huge deal that causes people post nearly 500 posts to crucify somebody. It is common.

It was not the topic of the thread starter either. His OP was about the recording. That is what generated all the drama.

Originally Posted by Natalia Mori

Yep I'm totally aware of it. I have personally experienced it several times already.



.

So Natalie, you just admitted what PistolPete was saying....it happens all the time and seem to miss his point that this thread has received the attention it has because of the recording aspect.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Tony Gambino

I hope the only non biased admin DED...is reading this....but i'll forward all this to him anyways...

[WTF]

Question....has Dorothy learnt that recording is not against the law yet?


Question 2) Have any of you ladies thought about recording the start of your sessions without agreeing to sex so that if you are busted you can use it in your defense like the provider did a couple of years ago?

Question 3) Ladies and gents, which is more dangerous , a lady that has all your personal information who ask you to trust her having it for her safety or a guy who has recorded a session and ask you to trust him with it for his safety?

Question 4) Do any of you ladies realize that BBBJ's are just as dangerous if not more so more in the transmission of HIV than BBFS because of just how many more BBBJ's you give compared to BBFS.


Question 5) Did some of you gents learn that slipping off the condom is a big no, no? Just ask if the lady if she does BBFS , many do at an upcharge. They will not admit to doing so here on the board , so do not post about it because all the ladies who do BBBJ's and not BBFS will then start accusing them of having HIV.



Very interesting thread. One where my man Pistol has been misunderstood!




.




.

[N.M.]

POST #503

I was obviously speaking in regards to what Tony said about about being pointed and to what is in red below. I was NOT speaking about BBBS. Genius.

I even QUOTED what Tony said, why would you think I was speaking about something other than what I quoted??
Please tell me that you can read it and comprehend it, and are just trying to twist it like your usual ways...

Enjoy this seconds of my attention you won't get it again.

What he said:

Originally Posted by Tony Gambino

after being pointed for answering PAPIs question asked in his own words...I wonder who their looking out for but hey.....just my opinion ....you know rules are rules, and when you piss them off they ban you................

What I said:

Originally Posted by Natalia Mori

Yep I'm totally aware of it. I have personally experienced it several times already.
And something tells me that more points are coming my way of course "not for what I just stated above" but he'll find the way to go around and somehow mask the reasons of why I will receive points... Maybe even get banned...


Topic: recording someone without their consent is wrong but barebacking them without their consent, is even Worst, please don't do it.

[Wakeup]

Papi not posting doesn't mean this thread will die...I don't give a fuck if he remembers it happened...it's more important that another group remembers it happened...

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Natalia Mori

POST #503

I was obviously speaking in regards to what Tony said about about being pointed and to what is in red below. I was NOT speaking about BBBS. Genius.

I even QUOTED what Tony said, why would you think I was speaking about something other than what I quoted??
Please tell me that you can read it and comprehend it, and are just trying to twist it like your usual ways...

Enjoy this seconds of my attention you won't get it again.

What he said:

[/B][/COLOR]

What I said:

All you have demonstrated is that you will never get the point. Subtle nuances are not your Forte.



.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Wakeup

Papi not posting doesn't mean this thread will die...I don't give a fuck if he remembers it happened...it's more important that another group remembers it happened...

How important on a scale of one to no one really gives a fuck?

[Wakeup]

You're not part of that group...so you shouldn't care in the slightest...you never have...

[GlobeSpotter]

Good morning shit hole website with shit hole staff and shit hole members.

Why does none of this conversation this morning surprise me?

Oh, that question should go in the sfq thread.

[Guest021217]

Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

Good morning shit hole website with shit hole staff and shit hole members.

Why does none of this conversation this morning surprise me?

Oh, that question should go in the sfq thread.

Because we are awesome

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

Good morning shit hole website with shit hole staff and shit hole members.

Why does none of this conversation this morning surprise me?

Oh, that question should go in the sfq thread.

You could always, oh I don't know, get the fuck out...

Just sayin'...

[Guest040816]

I thinck the creep got something confused with this article.
A mother that has HIV can have her child vacinated for protection 0-6months of age.
IF he is over 21, I doublt this applies to him.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16220994

Abstract
The interruption of HIV transmission from mother to child is important. Prevention strategies, including antiretroviral agents administered to the mother and/or child, can successfully prevent such transmission. Avoidance of breastfeeding or the administration of antiretroviral agents to the mother while she continues breastfeeding is another strategy. Based on the successful model of hepatitis B prevention by treatment of the newborn, research protocols have been designed to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV by the administration of passive HIV-specific antibody preparations and HIV vaccines to the mother and/or child. A number of animal studies using active and passive products have shown efficacy in similar settings, providing hope that a similar strategy will work in humans. Clinical trials conducted through the US National Institutes of Health AIDS Clinical Trials Programs have focused on such an approach. This article summarizes the results of a number of these trials, including AVEG (AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group) 104, a phase I study of active immunization of HIV-infected pregnant women with an HIV gp120 subunit vaccine, and PACTG (Pediatrics AIDS Clinical Trial Group) 185, a phase III efficacy trial of HIV immunoglobulin administered to HIV-infected pregnant women and their newborns. A number of HIV vaccine trials have been performed in HIV-exposed and -infected children. These include PACTG 218, a vaccine