ECCIE on Youtube

[TravelingGentleman]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

So if White or dark knight gave reviewed part of the review twisting op wording in review to make him bad in eyes of reviewed. Then op gave reviewed the ROS too defend self he is in violation of the guidelines. errr ops
what would be the points for this crime?
dang and she like the ROS after reading ahhhh errrrrr as I hear

Everyone here has the potential for critical thinking. Personally, I would expect the reviewed provider to ask the reviewer why the contents that have been sent to her were different than the contents he sent her.

Then the reviewer would note the discrepancies. Then the reviewer or provider would report said third party for not only linking ROS, but also for malicious action.

I suspect that's why armature is in trouble right now.

[dearhunter]

Originally Posted by H.Hardhat

Are you saying that the mods can pick and choose which guidelines they enforce? Remember WU was squawking for them to "do their fucking job" Squeaky wheel and all. As ambassador, do you have the authority to ban members, or do you have to RTM like the rest of us? Can you sit down in Modville and buy Ike a beer? Or are you locked out like the rest of us?
I would imagine you have access to the treehouse, know the secret handshake and all that cool stuff. Being "in the middle" you would need to be privy to modtard discussions.

No, I am saying what I said. I don't speak for WU. I can't speak to what ambassadors can and cannot see. I suggest you ask an ambassador. Ambassadors do not have the ability to ban or point someone.

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

So if White or dark knight gave reviewed part of the review twisting op wording in review to make him bad in eyes of reviewed. Then op gave reviewed the ROS too defend self he is in violation of the guidelines. errr ops
what would be the points for this crime?
dang and she like the ROS after reading ahhhh errrrrr as I hear

Your fucked up question aside, revealing ROS is worth a set amount of points......fucktards get popped for it all of the time.

[armature]

Originally Posted by WTF

This is a difference without distinction.

No it isn't.

Originally Posted by WTF

armature is trying to lie about an alert when Foxy has already posted that none exist. She has posted everything she did , she approved. armature is lying about that for some reason.

I never said any such thing. I said Foxy was disappointed what TG chose to share. I questioned whether Foxy got herself that drunk. And I said all women TG has reviewed are banned. None of the aforementioned are lies, and one point is a valid question given he seems to think drugging kids is ok.

I mainly said is he has posted unauthorized women's photos. That's it. You're being as stupid as he is. As in, if I were working with LE, I wouldn't have dealt with him on the interwebs that's for God damned sure.

Originally Posted by WTF

Probably the same reason she thinks it ok to degrade a posters family out of context .

Fuck him. Let him defend his fat wife. Notice he hasn't. Notice he posted all fucking day on Christmas. Where was his fat wife then? Notice he never retorts anything. He just screams, "I'm rich!" "I'm a duke!" "dh is a whatever he said!" "armature is an informant!" "WTF hates armature!" He's amateur with a little help from a traitor. Shame about the traitor.

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

I'm not even going to quote and requote armature, because she'd dodging it.

Dodging what? I'm not one of your employees. I though that would have been abundantly clear to everyone. Everything else I addressed. It is you that is dodging the unauthorized pics question.

[TravelingGentleman]

[QUOTE=armature;1057614686]
Dodging what? /QUOTE]


Since I can't even be arsed to waste my time with a decent response to your failure anymore...

----------------------


Since people are bound to start suspecting that armature is one of my employees since she recites her lines perfectly, I remind the community that I have standards.

I'd say on to the good stuff, but it's the same stuff - even the same quotes, since they're still the only ones that matter.


Quote:
Originally Posted by armature View Post
I was asked to join in by some ladies. It's about the pictures [TG] posted on other sites. But if you don't believe me...ask him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman View Post
I'd like to know what other site this is! I encourage full disclosure. Links, shaming, the whole works....

Unless you're talking about an internal police database that we unworthy don't have access to. Then keep it to yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by armature View Post
Sure, like I'm going to put a link on this site no one in their right mind would go to without proxying.
Well, guess that answers that! XYZ.police.gov? Keep on outing hobbyists.

Quote:
Originally Posted by armature View Post
I was asked to join in by some ladies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman View Post


You were asked to join a discussion that doesn't involve any ladies by some LADIES?!?

Listen here little trollmuffin - the art of trolling requires that you give some semblance of truth or engagement into a subject. It's beyond credulity that your hate speech has led you to claim that I'm a bud-light drinking, fat loser with a fat wife who's kicked him out of hearth, home and bed who hits women and scares off providers.

Now...you want us to believe....that someone WANTS you? It's beyond ridiculous that there's even an anonymous internet hooker out there so desperate for help against an imagined slight that she would summon a failed hooker turned police informant to join her cause.

Someone WANTS you?!? Given your proclivity for hate speech, the only person I could ever see wanting you would be the self-same "ideal man" that you've been describing and trying to attribute to me - a woman-beating, trailer-park, bud-light drinking hobo.

Oh God, it's too much. :laughin g1:
Nothing new here. The poll still stands at 86% of voters wishing armature would disappear.

[TravelingGentleman]

Anyway armature...stop sticking your face in other provider's goodies. And get off my dick.

Keep RMTing and getting points. You'll be gone soon. Again. For the third time.

[chicagoboy]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Keep RMTing and getting points. You'll be gone soon. Again. For the third time.

Armature has been here twice before? So, which of her "retired hooker handle(s) has been named multiple times"?

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Since your retired hooker handle has been named multiple times, I googled you because I was curious, and found a video of you.

[Guest021817-2]

This is getting easy, we now know the source.

[TravelingGentleman]

Originally Posted by lookn4boobies

This is getting easy, we now know the source.

The source of what?

The only place I get intel that I'm not supposed to know is from Chicagoboy, Google, and YouTube.

[Guest021817-2]

Just spit out some handles, that you know that have been banned, regarding armature.

[Island_Gent]

Originally Posted by WTF

If that kind of prose will give you a chubby

Yeah, I'm easy like that. And that's an intriguing suggestion you make there sir. If she'd come out of retirement for a brotha, I'd gladly spend time with her. I read some of those old reviews in her previous incarnation.

Originally Posted by WTF

...you need to do a double with her and Dorthy and review it. ..and be sure and send it to them to pre-approve.

Originally Posted by dearhunter

The whore can even pre-approve the ROS. The whore cannot acknowledge any of the above on the board.

Sure enough...as long as they both didn't yap about it afterwards...why not.

[Ansley]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

The source of what?

The only place I get intel that I'm not supposed to know is from ??????,Google, and YouTube.

Way to shoot the messenger.

[chicagoboy]

My posts are almost always educational, just not in the way tg is insinuating.

[Ansley]

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

My posts are almost always educational, just not in the way tg is insinuating.

Oops, sorry TG.

[armature]

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Since I can't even be arsed to waste my time with a decent response to your failure anymore...

Enjoy slick:

Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

And it's not classy for someone to decline sending you nudes. That's business. Try booking a session and request taking some pictures for personal use...and if you don't want to expend the time or effort for that, there are plenty of nudes on the Internet.

Wow. Just. Fucking. Wow. Way to confirm what I said. Crazy. You can thank like a billion members here for sending this lil gem to me. 'Cause, unlike you, I don't spend my entire fucking day on this bitch.

Anyway, ladies, you are forewarned about this predator. See him and you're going to be on the dark web.

FYI, I didn't read the rest of your diatribe. Butt, since you're so fucking interested in me and my doings...I'm'a gonna go get me a fat, Texas steak and the boldest red I can find on the menu. No Platinum for me just something bold that needs breathing in the decanter while I sip champagne and eat an appetizer or two. Tag, you lose. Peace out you wacky pussy hound.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by armature

Notice he posted all fucking day on Christmas. .

Yes I noticed you both posted all day on Christmas day.

I also notice you keep trying to infer that TG is at fault for the ladies bans. Nothing can be further from the truth.



.