Comey Defends Decision Not To Recommend Indictment of Hillary

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

What on earth do you mean by after the fact? Just more bullshit to avoid you have only one source and Powell himself denying it was said. I gave you a chance to find out for yourself but no you had to go wild with the name calling instead. If you find something that can prove it was said I would be interested in seeing it. I never denied it was said I merely asked for another source. Take a breath before you pop a vain.

How many times are you going to admit you're too stupid to see that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC misrepresented the story related in the New York Times article, MT Jockstrap?

[CuteOldGuy]

If Hillary is so smart, why did she base such a major decision on dessert conversation without checking it with her boss? It's not Powell's fault that Hillary placed confidential information out for the world to see, which may have resulted in the death of at least CIA asset. I doubt Powell would have approved.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

If Hillary is so smart, why did she base such a major decision on dessert conversation without checking it with her boss? It's not Powell's fault that Hillary placed confidential information out for the world to see, which may have resulted in the death of at least CIA asset. I doubt Powell would have approved.

You're looking at the big picture. Low-rent trolls like MT Pockface don't do that. Their mission is to waste our time and deflect our energies and attention away from the big picture by frivolously questioning the source. Answering your question is above the pay grade of a low-rent troll like MT Pockface.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

How many times are you going to admit you're too stupid to see that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC misrepresented the story related in the New York Times article, MT Jockstrap?

Them misrepresenting it has nothing to do with the fact that you have no other source and Powell disputed it. You keep making this about weird shit that has no bearing to the facts. It seems as though they are correct after all by the way.

One more time, do you have or are you willing to find something that proves what he said?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Them misrepresenting it has nothing to do with the fact that you have no other source and Powell disputed it. You keep making this about weird shit that has no bearing to the facts. It seems as though they are correct after all by the way.

One more time, do you have or are you willing to find something that proves what he said?

Anybody but a dumb, stupid turd like you can see that the only thing you need to refute flighty, Yahoo and CNBC is the source they claim to be citing, MT Jockstrap. What they claim the New York Times reported is not what the fuck the New York Times reported, MT Jockstrap. That's an elementary observation for anyone else other than a dumb, stupid turd like you, MT Jockstrap!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Them misrepresenting it has nothing to do with the fact that you have no other source...

LOL!

"Them misrepresenting it..."

More high-school dropout English from the low-rent troll!

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by lustylad

You're looking at the big picture. Low-rent trolls like MT Pockface don't do that. Their mission is to waste our time and deflect our energies and attention away from the big picture by questioning the source. Answering your question is above the pay grade of a low-rent troll like MT Pockface.

Wow! I didn't know you were so important. So far it stands as Powell not saying it. Prove me wrong. Honestly I don't know, I stumbled across him denying it while looking for where he said it.
I love your new flavor of insults. I am all flustered Ha Ha!

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are a true lib-retard, flighty, you and your lib-retard sources conveniently see and extract what you want to see despite what Powell really said.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Anybody but a dumb, stupid turd like you can see that the only thing you need to refute flighty, Yahoo and CNBC is the source they claim to be citing, MT Jockstrap. What they claim the New York Times reported is not what the fuck the New York Times reported, MT Jockstrap. That's an elementary observation for anyone else other than a dumb, stupid turd like you, MT Jockstrap!

I think Jackie thinks you are a liar. He say's it didnt happen so go call him a jackstrap or whatever pet name you come up with.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1058538701

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

I think Jackie thinks you are a liar. He say's it didnt happen so go call him a jackstrap or whatever pet name you come up with.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1058538701

I never argued that it actually happened, MT Jockstrap. I argued that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC mendaciously lied when they selectively misquoted the New York Times article in regards to what Powell purportedly said about "classified material", MT Jockstrap.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I never argued that it actually happened, MT Jockstrap. I argued that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC mendaciously lied when they selectively misquoted the New York Times article in regards to what Powell purportedly said about "classified material", MT Jockstrap.

So are you saying it didn't happen now?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

So are you saying it didn't happen now?

Are you completely illiterate, MT Jockstrap? What I said, and what I have repeatedly said for the sake of your dim-witted ass, is that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC mendaciously lied when they selectively misquoted the New York Times article in regards to what Powell purportedly said about "classified material", MT Jockstrap.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Are you completely illiterate, MT Jockstrap? What I said, and what I have repeatedly said for the sake of your dim-witted ass, is that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC mendaciously lied when they selectively misquoted the New York Times article in regards to what Powell purportedly said about "classified material", MT Jockstrap.

Yes, but did you say it didn't even happen ? That is what I said and you called me a liar. Look at the link I posted.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Yes, but did you say it didn't even happen ? That is what I said and you called me a liar. Look at the link I posted.

What I said, and what I have repeatedly said for the sake of your dim-witted ass, is that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC mendaciously lied when they selectively misquoted the New York Times article in regards to what Powell purportedly said about "classified material", MT Jockstrap.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Yes, but did you say it didn't even happen ? That is what I said and you called me a liar.

Calm down, MT jockstrap... You're the one who called journalist Joe Conason a "liar" and a "hack" after you read the New York Times link describing him as "a longtime defender of the Clintons".

Now that you've acknowledged that anyone who defends the Clintons is ipso facto a liar and a hack, are you going to continue to defend them?

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Calm down, MT jockstrap... You're the one who called journalist Joe Conason a "liar" and a "hack" after you read the New York Times link describing him as "a longtime defender of the Clintons".

Now that you've acknowledged that anyone who defends the Clintons is ipso facto a liar and a hack, are you going to continue to defend them?

You guys are a blast. You will defend whatever comes along with your life and 10 minutes later take off in some other direction. So did the fucker say it or not is what I want to know. I bet you cant decide. Let see if he said you lose the battle with Hillary and if he didnt you lose face with me. Well since Hillary is gonna win no matter what and I live to make you clowns miserable I see it as a win/win for me you are just left holding you dick. LOL