Why do clients lie to providers about their session? Say they're having a great time and then write a no review??

[BobsAlias]

🍿

I missed this board.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by SpicyOnion

A "true" provider will never care about access to ROS or shows interest in knowing such. Can name a few that belong to this category.

But, ROS and ML are ____, on the other hand I don't think any of the guys have access to their powder room....except mods and admins...due to the nature of their job.

Do not be naive.

There really is no way to ensure that women stay out of men's areas, or men out of women's. Assume nothing is as "private" as you might like.

[Savannah Moon]

Originally Posted by Gemma34

But would they see you?
BET

BET
Yes they would & then some
Love ya MUCH

OXOXXX

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1823994

[IronRiver]

I think asking why a no was a good thing, perhaps the delivery could have been different, but the question and explanations were good reading. It also now may have made me rethink an offer that is out there that i may have decided against due to the "no" reviews

[SweetSuzanna]

How can anyone not have some opinions here! Wow.
Its hard for providers to speak here as we don't know all that was said in the ROS. So I can only speak about what I have been able to read.
Nobody is right or wrong: its a difference of opinion and misunderstanding and lack of communication. Both parties are handling it well by not bashing each other-props for that!
Nothing is or will ever be private. Ladies have ways to read ROS and come on, we can't deny our curiosity! Its set up so guys can be as honest as they want without fear of retaliation. I understand that but it also let's them say whatever they want if it's true or false. Its a messed up system and I think anyone would try to defend themselves. Sounds like he was nice in the ROS So it must not have been horrible, but c'mon the guy has one choice. Yes or No. If guys base their choice on that alone then that is stupid on their part and not fair to the provider. Its like getting an 'F' in school but your teacher won't say why. Or getting written up at work but boss won't say 'why'. She should know why. Maybe not read the whole ROS but have someone give her the main reason! Then perhaps she could fix it like not smoking before or being more...whatever the problem was. Or she could say "rushed him? Uh no he chose to leave"
Why would a guy give a no just for fun? Serves him no purpose. Plus providers may think twice about seeing him especially cuz we dunno "what she did wrong". Guys can read powder room stuff somehow. Be careful what you say and how you say it.
Do your ho-mwork! Get it? Ho? Ask questions and never ask during a session for something she already said 'no' to!
We get that you don't like condoms! We have heard all the reasons! We don't like paying for em or trying to open the damn wrapper with lube on your hands! I guarantee neither of us wants AIDS either.
I am rambling!
New review system? Hell ya!. Its not black and white. Personal preference unless something horrendous happened. Just don't see her again. Will the next guy be safe? That's the important thing. Maybe get rid of yes and no and just state facts. Please continue to do reviews though. That's our way to get business. If we make it risky for guys to do them, they won't. Stick to facts keep opinions between the two of you. For me, I would see either of you-maybe at the same time! They say negative publicity is better than none! Play on!

[Savannah Moon]

Escorts.com
Was AMAZING we ..as providers could read the whole review..it was not cliquey. & I just wish it had never gone down.

[bilbobaggin]

Originally Posted by SweetSuzanna

New review system? Hell ya!. Its not black and white. Personal preference unless something horrendous happened.

Agreed. Review needs something besides yes or no. Sometimes it's not binary. Sometimes it's in between. And sometimes it's so amazing that a yes doesn't seem adequate.

[malwoody]

It's a catch 22 really IMO..

It's certainly understandable why a provider does not want a no. Also understandable why guys are reluctant to write one. Why not a rating system. IMO it would make research easier for both sides. 1-10, Attitude, IOP, etc..

[BigDeal]

Originally Posted by malwoody

It's a catch 22 really IMO..

It's certainly understandable why a provider does not want a no. Also understandable why guys are reluctant to write one. Why not a rating system. IMO it would make research easier for both sides. 1-10, Attitude, IOP, etc..

Maybe it should be 1-5

Most of us guys on here cant get past 5 fingers

[SweetSuzanna]

I think 1 to 10 gives more options to be really specific. 5 is average, 6 is a bit better, 7 really good, 8 great, 9 amazing and 10 is stupendous! One of your best experiences. Who has the power to change the rating system? There must be other cities that would agree

[AshleySweets]

Originally Posted by Gemma34

Ok she got 2 NO reviews and you contradictory assholes want to know why she addressed it publicly? Or why she's reacting the way she is? Or maybe you'd like to bash her some more for addressing it out in the open just as the contradicting schmucks wrote a fucking public review! Jezus Fucking Tits!

She has every right to ask why the NO reviews. She has every right to be upset and probably a little hurt.

So fuck you all for not having some sympathy for the girl for just getting 2 NO reviews in a row! It doesn't only hurt the providers rep. when something like this happens.

She was respectful and professional about the way she addressed the issue. How dare they attempt to try make her feel conflicted about wanting to know some answers about the confusion.
It's her right to seek answers. It's not hurting her business.... If anything her wanting to clear up confusion would HELP her business!!! She's a true provider that goes above and beyond.

[Guest090920]

Originally Posted by AshleySweets

... How dare they ...

It's her right to seek answers.

"How dare they?" I'll tell you how. I'm going to let you in on a little secret; this is a SHMB. People have opinions, popular ones and unpopular ones. Combine that with what I call keyboard anonymity (Internet bravery) and anything can happen and oftentimes does!

I agree she has a right to seek answers and the reviewer has a right to not divulge his reasons for any statements he made or his recommendation to her or the community.

Are we done with this thread?

[satan666]

i have watched this thread spiral from the get i agree its not right for clients to lie about things! but in all fairness and this is not directed towards miss rabbit. but its also not fair when providers lie to clients either. like set up appointments at an agreed upon price then change the cost once the session starts. or i find it deplorable when a provider sets up knowing damn well she is on her cycle gets bcd gets paid starts session then oh oops i just started after we set up! or the ladies who try and pull the scams of pay before play with a sob story and no intentions on following through. i know of several gals who do this on this board!

in the end its a two way street. if ladies are not honest with the men and likewise. well then were never going to get anywhere. like if a guy steps in pays up and decides this isnt going too work many ladies have the too bad so sad attitude and will keep the entire donation instead of being fair and keeping some for her trouble and refunding part of the donation.

[JRLawrence]

Originally Posted by SweetSuzanna

How can anyone not have some opinions here! Wow.

Its hard for providers to speak here as we don't know all that was said in the ROS.

What?

So I can only speak about what I have been able to read.
Nobody is right or wrong: its a difference of opinion and misunderstanding and lack of communication. Both parties are handling it well by not bashing each other-props for that!
Nothing is or will ever be private. Ladies have ways to read ROS and come on, we can't deny our curiosity! Its set up so guys can be as honest as they want without fear of retaliation. I understand that but it also let's them say whatever they want if it's true or false. Its a messed up system and I think anyone would try to defend themselves. Sounds like he was nice in the ROS So it must not have been horrible, but c'mon the guy has one choice. Yes or No. If guys base their choice on that alone then that is stupid on their part and not fair to the provider. Its like getting an 'F' in school but your teacher won't say why. Or getting written up at work but boss won't say 'why'. She should know why. Maybe not read the whole ROS but have someone give her the main reason! Then perhaps she could fix it like not smoking before or being more...whatever the problem was. Or she could say "rushed him? Uh no he chose to leave"
Why would a guy give a no just for fun? Serves him no purpose. Plus providers may think twice about seeing him especially cuz we dunno "what she did wrong". Guys can read powder room stuff somehow. Be careful what you say and how you say it.
Do your ho-mwork! Get it? Ho? Ask questions and never ask during a session for something she already said 'no' to!
We get that you don't like condoms! We have heard all the reasons! We don't like paying for em or trying to open the damn wrapper with lube on your hands! I guarantee neither of us wants AIDS either.
I am rambling!
New review system? Hell ya!. Its not black and white. Personal preference unless something horrendous happened. Just don't see her again. Will the next guy be safe? That's the important thing. Maybe get rid of yes and no and just state facts. Please continue to do reviews though. That's our way to get business. If we make it risky for guys to do them, they won't. Stick to facts keep opinions between the two of you. For me, I would see either of you-maybe at the same time! They say negative publicity is better than none! Play on!

I didn't know that!

[satan666]

Originally Posted by MrNyceGuy

I would think all Jessicas yes reviews would trump a few No reviews.

Plus, theaee ROS comments are what they are. I know for a fact that a hooker cannot cum 5 times in an hour session, yet 99% of the ROS comments say she did. Either that, or she is a good actor.

Well, they are good actors,thats why they pull in 200-250 for an hour of work. Its work for a provider, buy they are good at it.

Typical ROS comment. She opened the day, let me in and gave my a nice kiss. I think she O'd. We stripped out of our cloths and laid on the bed. I started to rub her pussy, she loved it and O'd again. I started licking her pussy and asshole, a minute later she O'd again. I put a cover one, she sat on my dick and O'd again. I dressed, and walked to the door, she kissed me and I swear her legs buckled and she O'd again. I texted her when I got in my car, she didnt respond right away. Later she told me when she saw my number pop up again on her phone, she O'd again and couldnt text back.

Thankfully the ladies cannot read ROS comments. They would laugh do hard, half of them might O again.

Take care, play safe.

you have obviously never been with a multi orgasmic woman!

Originally Posted by royamcr

Need to make it so anyone to read ROS and Mens LR that 4-5 reviews have to be written first, even 3 would be better than none. No more buying your way in. Girls have their secret area where they can talk about guys, and you need top secret clearance to get in there. Whereas a $20 and anyone including law can tally up activity.

Still would have the WK pussies fucking things up but at least we could weed out 95% of people that shouldn't be in there. Lots of paying lurkers on this site that don't contribute.

+a million

Originally Posted by VinnAY

Unless something bad where to happen, I don't leave a "no" review, at least never again will I do it. As long as I didn't get robbed and she showed up then it's all good but sure, not every hobby experience is fantastic. I have a left a no (or a maybe?) just one time and fuck if I didn't get blasted on the forum for it and a call from the provider.
Other than finding legit providers and knowing rates and services I find the rest of the forum, at least the reviews, to be of little to no use, such that I stopped posting reviews for peoples snide little comments and acting like every detail is some "ROS" secret or suffer the wrath of one of the girls.

and your not helping the community by doing this. what do you care if a provider you dont care too see again gives you backlash. block her number from your phone and block her on the forum. that is unless you like to follow the drama!

Originally Posted by Old-T

Do not be naive.

There really is no way to ensure that women stay out of men's areas, or men out of women's. Assume nothing is as "private" as you might like.

true don't be naive but like stated above you can buy your way into the mens lounge. you cant buy your way into the powder room you have to be a vp. and to my knowledge in order too do this you have to show i.d and have a website as well as reviews! not that a guy cant jump through hoops too accomplish this. and also too my knowledge even if your a vp does not give you automatic access to the powder room! and the likeliness of a provider showing a client pr info is unlikely too happen.

Originally Posted by SweetSuzanna

How can anyone not have some opinions here! Wow.
Its hard for providers to speak here as we don't know all that was said in the ROS. So I can only speak about what I have been able to read.
Nobody is right or wrong: its a difference of opinion and misunderstanding and lack of communication. Both parties are handling it well by not bashing each other-props for that!
Nothing is or will ever be private. Ladies have ways to read ROS and come on, we can't deny our curiosity! Its set up so guys can be as honest as they want without fear of retaliation. I understand that but it also let's them say whatever they want if it's true or false. Its a messed up system and I think anyone would try to defend themselves. Sounds like he was nice in the ROS So it must not have been horrible, but c'mon the guy has one choice. Yes or No. If guys base their choice on that alone then that is stupid on their part and not fair to the provider. Its like getting an 'F' in school but your teacher won't say why. Or getting written up at work but boss won't say 'why'. She should know why. Maybe not read the whole ROS but have someone give her the main reason! Then perhaps she could fix it like not smoking before or being more...whatever the problem was. Or she could say "rushed him? Uh no he chose to leave"
Why would a guy give a no just for fun? Serves him no purpose. Plus providers may think twice about seeing him especially cuz we dunno "what she did wrong". Guys can read powder room stuff somehow. Be careful what you say and how you say it.
Do your ho-mwork! Get it? Ho? Ask questions and never ask during a session for something she already said 'no' to!
We get that you don't like condoms! We have heard all the reasons! We don't like paying for em or trying to open the damn wrapper with lube on your hands! I guarantee neither of us wants AIDS either.
I am rambling!
New review system? Hell ya!. Its not black and white. Personal preference unless something horrendous happened. Just don't see her again. Will the next guy be safe? That's the important thing. Maybe get rid of yes and no and just state facts. Please continue to do reviews though. That's our way to get business. If we make it risky for guys to do them, they won't. Stick to facts keep opinions between the two of you. For me, I would see either of you-maybe at the same time! They say negative publicity is better than none! Play on!

i do not base my opinion of of the yes or no recommendation. i base it off rest of story regardless what the rec is. however when a trend of no reviews start to stack up in succession that could be a red flag that something has changed in the providers life causing her business to suffer. whether it be rw problems drug addiction or any combination there of. so when no's stack up it gives us reason for caution. and we have all seen it at one point or another where providers and hobbyists alike spiral out of control ijs.