Fumbling Bumbling Idiots

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by lustylad

No he didn't. He redacted the name of a CIA agent before releasing hildebeest's emails. Cummings tried to distort what happened. Stop lying and deflecting, trashboy. Only pathologically insecure people post in boldface all the time.

"He redacted" So he altered evidence and made it look like it was classified. Same difference fool.

"pathologically insecure people post in boldface" So when your lover IB makes the quote small and washed out looking and increases the font size does that make him a better person?
By the way from this link https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...bably-insecure you tried to use the 1st one on me so now who is the pathologically insecure one? Also while they all seem to be in your wheelhouse #4 is common in all conservatives

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

"He redacted" So he altered evidence and made it look like it was classified. Same difference fool.

"pathologically insecure people post in boldface" So when your lover IB makes the quote small and washed out looking and increases the font size does that make him a better person?
By the way from this link https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...bably-insecure you tried to use the 1st one on me so now who is the pathologically insecure one? Also while they all seem to be in your wheelhouse #4 is common in all conservatives

You've been the jackass that is posting in bold, M T Brain Socket. You just skewered your own lib-retard-ass, M T Brain Socket.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Is WTF really that dense or does he just play the part?

It seems he is fine with leaving corrupt people in place because he believes they will only be replaced with a more corrupt people. It is called reality....you should try it. This is no different than say Jerusalem.....the party in power, rules the city. If the Muslims had more firepower, the Jews would be the bad guys. Corruption is in the eye of the beholder. I know that is two complicated for ya there 2dogs but thems the facts.
Well I agree that that is always a potential problem regardless of the party in charge, but I would rather take my chnaces with an unknown than to allow a corrupt one to stay. Of course you want to replace the people who do not see the world like you with folks that do....big surprise there. You are just making my point. Look , to the Victor go the Spoils but do not make it out to be some high moral ground

By the way, there are a whole lot of other news organizations than Fox that are reporting what is being found out.

Really...and which one's are distorting the truth like Fox?

Originally Posted by bambino

It’s hard to tell if Snitchy is playing stupid on purpose, or he was born that way. I’m thinking he’s playing the hand he was dealt.

[Guest123018-4]

MTBrain I mean pockets.

Are you really that dumb?
No, seriously, are you really that dumb?

Hillary has never been found "not guilty" n a court of law for the crimes she committed as Secretary of State or as a candidate for POTUS. There has never been a real investigation by the FBI into her crimes. The DOJ was in on the sham.

[Guest123018-4]

Bambino, I thinck you are correct. The hand he was dealt.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Corruption is in the eye of the beholder.

Wrong, asshole. Soft-pedaling an investigation and predetermining its outcome for political reasons is corruption, no matter which party benefits from it.

Colluding with one political party to obtain a warrant to spy on the opposing party during the heat of a campaign is corruption, no matter which side benefits from it.

Bam is right... you were born stupid!

[bambino]

[QUOTE=lustylad;1060420386]Wrong, asshole. Soft-pedaling an investigation and predetermining its outcome for political reasons is corruption, no matter which party benefits from it.

Colluding with one political party to obtain a warrant to spy on the opposing party during the heat of a campaign is corruption, no matter which side benefits from it.

Bam is right... you were born stupid![/QUOTE

It’s pretty obvious.

[Guest123018-4]

Yo man, I didn steel nuffin, I borrowed dat car.

[Guest123018-4]

That is WTF's logic.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

"He redacted" So he altered evidence and made it look like it was classified. Same difference fool.

"pathologically insecure people post in boldface" So when your lover IB makes the quote small and washed out looking and increases the font size does that make him a better person?
By the way from this link https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...bably-insecure you tried to use the 1st one on me so now who is the pathologically insecure one? Also while they all seem to be in your wheelhouse #4 is common in all conservatives

He was under a legal obligation to redact the CIA operative's name, ya friggen MORON ! YOUR selective, LYING LIBERAL, WK FOR LUBE memory about officials in the Bush 2 administration being investigated and PROSECUTED for giving up Valerie Plame as a CIA agent must have NEVER stuck in that cum dumpster of YOURS !

[WTF]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Bambino, I thinck you are correct. The hand he was dealt.

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

whitewater

White water was way before this issue..

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Because she was innocent LOL!
You guys did all you could to convict her . Gowdy even fabricated evidence. How many times did they investigate Benghazi?

What evidence did gowdy fabricate against her?
AND IF HE DID fabricate any, why isn't HE UNDER ARREST for creating that fabricated evidence?

CAUSE HE DIDN'T!

[Guest123018-4]

You can't fix stupid.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

You can't fix stupid.

As you prove with each and every one of your posts.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by garhkal

White water was way before this issue..

yes, but due to the way the comment was worded, whitewater was the only case that the clintons were taken to court and yes its before the current issue..