Encounter: Alex-Hell No

[Dunknown29]

Date: 3/21/2019
Name: Alex
Phone: +1 (832) 260-5599
Email Address: N/a
URL / Website: https://houston.bedpage.com/Therapeu...s/6721413.html
City: Houston
State: Texas
Address: Houston. Westchase area
Activities: None
Hair Length and Color: IDK
Age: IDK
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: -
Physical Description: I don’t know. She flakes on our appointment.
Recommendation: No

[Come1297]

Dam if she is real I would let her pee on me all day

[Ned_Filanderer]

[synnersterz]

Damn!
I saw her last week, everything went smooth. Pics are her, she's an amazing provider (imo) i saw her at 8 p.m. So idk what was wrong with your schedule.

[LexusLover]

The linked ad says "a lexia" ... not "Alex" ... so "Alexia"?

(Except in the body!)

For starters a "no" (or "yes" review for that matter) should have the correct spelling of the name in it in the headline of the ad or at least an "AKA," although I do realize that some of these ladies attempt to escape negative press by name and number changes, not to mention "new" pics. So, it's important to stick as many potential identifiers in the threads (reviews) as possible within the Eccie guidelines.....meaning everything the providers post in their ads.

For those of us who actually track down history on some of the fakes and frauds it is helpful, so that we can mine the information and share it with the lazy members or those just too dumb to do the research.....of which the number seems to be growing.

[Nautingale]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

The linked ad says "a lexia" ... not "Alex" ... so "Alexia"?

(Except in the body!)

For starters a "no" (or "yes" review for that matter) should have the correct spelling of the name in it in the headline of the ad or at least an "AKA," although I do realize that some of these ladies attempt to escape negative press by name and number changes, not to mention "new" pics. So, it's important to stick as many potential identifiers in the threads (reviews) as possible within the Eccie guidelines.....meaning everything the providers post in their ads.

For those of us who actually track down history on some of the fakes and frauds it is helpful, so that we can mine the information and share it with the lazy members or those just too dumb to do the research.....of which the number seems to be growing.

Very well stated.

[tbone2u]

Yep

[waffleiron]

Man that’s a bummer .... some of the other reviews have been positive , was wanting to see her . The other negative review that I have read is it due to something else, but a guy looking out her window??......yeah I’d be uncomfortable. Maybe it was her previous client

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by waffleiron

Man that’s a bummer .... some of the other reviews have been positive , was wanting to see her . The other negative review that I have read is it due to something else, but a guy looking out her window??......yeah I’d be uncomfortable. Maybe it was her previous client

Please do yourself a favor and NEVER FORGET ....

Generally reviews are for one person: The Reviewer!

Purpose:
1. Extending fuller access to "private" material.
2. Ingratiating the reviewer to provider for access/discounts.
3. Chest beating about male "prowess."
4. "Establishing" oneself "in the community" as a "player"!
5. ______________________________ _____________________________

An HONEST review will only accomplish 1 (maybe 2) out of 5 of those.

[Ned_Filanderer]

Personally, I try for a “just the facts” approach to my reviews. Yes, I want access so there is motivation there, but writing anything that exaggerates or is blatantly false is not helpful. I guess I put too much faith in others objectives of something so simple as an honest review.

[Daddio]

Did you eat her McDonalds? What did she order? Lol.

[synnersterz]

Originally Posted by Daddio

Did you eat her McDonalds? What did she order? Lol.

Yo that's the real question lol