Politics
Published       September 09, 2019     
Last Update       an hour ago     
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
       By       
Gregg Re |            Fox News         
Continue Reading Below
The Central Intelligence Agency on Monday evening slammed what it called CNN's "misguided" and "simply false" 
reporting, after the cable channel's chief national security correspondent authored 
a hole-filled piece claiming  that the CIA had pulled a high-level spy out of Russia because  President Trump had "repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and  could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy."
The extraordinary CIA rebuke came as The New York Times published a 
bombshell piece late in the evening,  which largely contradicted CNN's reporting. According to the Times, CIA  officials "made the arduous decision in late 2016 to offer to extract  the source from Russia" -- weeks before Trump even took office.
Concerns  about media reporting on Russian election interference drove the  decision, according to the Times, which described the source as "the  American government’s best insight into the thinking of and orders” from  Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"Former intelligence officials  said there was no public evidence that Mr. Trump directly endangered the  source, and other current American officials insisted that media  scrutiny of the agency’s sources alone was the impetus for the  extraction," the Times wrote.
FBI STILL SILENT AFTER SENATE CMTE PROBES KEY TRUMP TOWER INTEL BRIEFING -- WHICH RAISED QUESTIONS ABOUT LEAKS TO CNN
Continue Reading Below
The  purported spy refused the 2016 offer of extraction, the Times reported,  citing family concerns. But the CIA "pressed again months later after  more media inquiries" threatened the source, and he relented, according  to the paper.
The whirlwind developments continued into the night on Monday, when NBC News exclusively reported that a possible Russia spy 
was now living under apparent U.S. protection,  using his true identity, in Washington, D.C. -- and that his life could  be in danger. Sources told NBC News that the Russian living in  Washington was the same individual who was referenced in the reporting  by CNN and the Times, and NBC said he "fits the profile of someone who  may have had access to information about Putin’s activities."
An  NBC reporter who knocked at the Russian's door was confronted by  unidentified men in an SUV, presumed to be security personnel, within  minutes. Speculation about the purported 
spy's identity, using publicly available records, quickly circulated on social media after NBC News' report revealed identifiable details about his living situation. 
Russian officials reportedly said the man at the center of those reports, Oleg Smolenkov, worked in the presidential administration but was fired and did not have direct access to Putin.

         Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during a reception for  graduates of Russian military education institutions in the Kremlin in  Moscow, Russia, on Thursday, June 27, 2019. (Alexei Druzhinin, Sputnik,  Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)         
"CNN's narrative that the Central  Intelligence Agency makes life-or-death decisions based on anything  other than objective analysis and sound collection is simply false," CIA  Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell said in the  agency's statement.
Bramwell continued: "Misguided speculation  that the President's handling of our nation's most sensitive  intelligence — which he has access to each and every day — drove an  alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate."
DISPUTE  ERUPTS OVER WHETHER COMEY, BRENNAN PUSHED DOSSIER; INTEL CHIEF LEAKED  DOSSIER BRIEFING TO CNN, KICKSTARTING RUSSIA NARRATIVE
According  to the report by CNN chief national correspondent and former Obama  administration official Jim Sciutto, the decision to carry out the  extraction "occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in  which Trump discussed 
highly classified intelligence with  Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to  the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had  been provided by Israel."
The disclosure "prompted intelligence  officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk of  exposure," CNN reported.
Sciutto 
later posted on Twitter,  after the Times report was published, that the double agent in  jeopardy had the "remarkable ability to take photos of presidential  documents," as well as "direct access" to Putin.
"CNN's  narrative that the Central Intelligence Agency makes life-or-death  decisions based on anything other than objective analysis and sound  collection is simply false."
— CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell
It  was not clear from the CNN piece how exactly Trump's comments in the  Oval Office would have further compromised the Russian source.
Numerous other holes quickly surfaced in CNN's reporting. Commentator Aaron Mate 
pointed out in a Twitter thread  that several major news organizations had previously cited a high-level  official in the Russian government as a source -- suggesting that the  intelligence community itself, not Trump, had compromised the spy.
For example, 
The Washington Post reported in June 2017  of "'sourcing deep inside the Russian government' -- so deep that it  purportedly 'captured Putin’s specific instructions' to launch a  pro-Trump influence campaign," 
Matte noted.
GRAHAM HITS CNN FOR HIRING FMR FBI HEAD ANDREW MCCABE, WHO WAS FIRED FOR LYING UNDER OATH
And the Times 
reported in August 2018 of  "anonymous intel officials complaining that their 'vital Kremlin  informants have largely gone silent.'" But "if these Kremlin informants  are so vital, why are US intel officials talking about them?" Matte  asked.
The source 
resurfaced in May 2019, when the Times "reported on intel fears of this source being exposed."
"Again,  the irony is lost that it's the ones who are complaining who are the  ones revealing this supposed source," Matte wrote. "So there's a pattern  here of intel leaks in order to: create a false link between  Trump-Russia; to reveal supposed high-level Russian sources that advance  the Russiagate narrative & then falsely blame Trump for these  sources' supposed vulnerability."
Fox  News understands that the CIA typically makes the decision to withdraw  an asset only after a long deliberative process, and that the move would  not ordinarily be taken based on a single event involving classified  information, as CNN implied.
CNN 
has been faulted for its inaccurate intelligence reporting  in the past. In December 2017, CNN falsely reported that Donald Trump,  Jr. had advance access to hacked WikiLeaks emails, in what Glenn  Greenwald called "
one of the most humiliating spectacles in the history of the U.S. media." Several of the organization's much-touted journalists were 
forced out earlier that year for a separate false Russia bombshell.
TRUMP TEARS INTO MSNBC AFTER RUSSIA BOMBSHELL GOES BUST IN LESS THAN 24 HOURS
CNN did not immediately reply to Fox News' request for comment. Sciutto 
claimed on CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" late Monday that the Times had "confirmed" his reporting. Numerous other news organizations, including Vox, The Hill, and the Guardian, 
picked up CNN's original story uncritically.
The developments led to speculation as to who had leaked the information to CNN -- especially in light of previous 
anti-Trump leaks that found their way from the intelligence community to CNN's airwaves -- and led commentators to again fault the accuracy of CNN's initial reporting.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"In  their fervor to blame President Trump for mishandling classified  information, CNN potentially risked lives," a source familiar with the  matter 
told The Daily Wire. "They  had multiple on-the-record quotes from Administration officials telling  them. Their story was not only wrong, but irresponsible and dangerous,  and CNN decided to run with it anyway."
Fox News' Catherine Herridge contributed to this report.