Quote:
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Zollner
					 
				 
				No but they should have been tested or quarantined. It never happened but NOW Double-talking Don LIES saying they all were !  
Do you find him 'credible'?!?!?
   
			
		 | 
	
	
 
whew much confusion  whew 
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...ses-rise-to-11
The Trump administration's aggressive efforts to protect Americans from the coronavirus are drawing both praise and criticism.
   On Friday, the federal government 
temporarily banned entry  into the United States for anyone traveling from China who isn't a U.S.  citizen, permanent resident or an immediate family member of either.
   
In  addition, any Americans returning to the U.S. from China's Hubei  Province, which is the epicenter of the outbreak, will be quarantined  for 14 days.
   Some politicians and biosecurity experts are  praising these steps. They say the actions are necessary because of the  threat posed by the virus.
   "Nobody likes quarantines. Nobody likes travel restrictions," says
 Kenneth Bernard,  a biodefense consultant who served in the George W. Bush  administration. "But nobody likes getting sick and dying from the virus  either. We need to understand that this is potentially a very dangerous  virus that is spreading very rapidly." 
   The virus has already  sickened thousands and killed hundreds in China, and the toll is rising  rapidly. In the U.S., only a small number of cases have been reported so  far, mostly among travelers returning from China. But Bernard notes  that there are many uncertainties, including how easily the virus  spreads and how lethal it is.
                   "You have to take sometimes draconian measures just to protect the population," Bernard says.
   But  many public health experts worry that some of the steps are  unnecessary, overly aggressive and could be counter-productive,  especially the travel ban.
   "I think that the Trump  administration is sliding from complacency and over-confidence to panic  and overreaction to a point where we're going instill panic and fear in  the American public," says 
Lawrence Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University. "We have to keep our head here and remain calm."
   Gostin  agrees that it probably makes sense to quarantine people who are  clearly at high risk for having been exposed to the virus.
   On  Friday health officials announced that 195 people who had been evacuated  from China last week were being quarantined for 14 days at an air force  base in California. 
   This is the first time in 50 years the federal government is imposing its quarantine authority on Americans. 
   But  other experts worry the administrations plans to quarantine additional  travelers could strain already scarce public health resources.
   "I think we're going to very quickly reach the upper limits of our capacity," says 
Jennifer Nuzzo, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
   Some  public health experts say they are also concerned about protecting the  civil liberties of those being quarantined, especially because the CDC
 gained broader quarantine authorities about three years ago.
   In addition, some say the prospect of being quarantined could end up hindering an effective response.
   "It backfires because people head for the hills," says 
Wendy Parmet,  a professor of health law policy at Northeastern University. "People  don't call and seek health care when they might be becoming sick. And  health care providers become fearful of treating patients because they  don't want to get caught up in the quarantine."
 
But the travel ban is raising the biggest concerns.
   Historically,  critics say, travel restrictions haven't been effective. That's one  reason the World Health Organization is advising against banning travel.
 
Parmet  says that travel restrictions may give the appearance of "acting  tough," but actually provides "false comfort that we can keep out germs  by barring travel."
   "We are deluding ourselves, and that's dangerous," Parmet says. "It just doesn't work that way."
 
The  travel ban could alienate Chinese authorities, making it more difficult  to get China to work with the rest of the world to get the outbreak  under control, Parmet and others say.
   The restriction could also make it difficult to get crucial personnel and supplies in and out of China, they say.
   There's  also concern that other countries may be less forthcoming about  reporting to avoid being subjected to travel bans and trade  restrictions.
   
All flights from China are being re-routed to 11  U.S. airports. And any U.S. citizens who have been in other parts of  China in the past two weeks are being subject to screening and close  monitoring for 14 days.
whew much silly posters upstate .. er upset! whew