Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 318
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 303
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71382
biomed168179
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455120
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49538
WTF48272
pyramider46430
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid40225
CryptKicker37407
Mokoa36512
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34880

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2020, 08:48 AM   #31
Lucas McCain
Valued Poster
 
Lucas McCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 11,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
The Kansas City Chiefs just signed their QB Patrick Mahomes to a $500 Million dollar extension for 10 years. That is a new record for team sports. Somebody is watching football, that is for sure.

The Super Bowl has the highest Nielson ratings of any Prime Time television program. The NFL will survive without you.
The kid deserves it. I thought I would not see anyone as talented as Aaron Rodgers anytime soon. Mahomes proved me wrong his 1st year as a starter. And yes, I do love watching the NFL. Unfortunately, I am a Cowboys fan so I guess I just like torturing myself and I definitely must love disappointment.
Lucas McCain is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 09:10 AM   #32
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

500 million???? the owner is insane.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 09:30 AM   #33
Lucas McCain
Valued Poster
 
Lucas McCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 11,167
Default

He still has 2 years left on his rookie contract left and if he hits the incentives on his 10 year extension, it is worth $477M for a potential TCV of $503M. Football is not baseball or basketball though. Contracts are not 100% guaranteed. Apparently the 2nd half of his contract extension is when the big money really kicks in and they can cut him if they don't want to pay it.
Lucas McCain is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 09:38 AM   #34
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 45,243
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
500 million???? the owner is insane.
63 million is truly guaranteed. He’s still on his original contract for the next two years. He would have to hit every incentive to earn the full amount. He’s already the best QB in the NFL. And he’s young.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...l?platform=amp
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 11:48 AM   #35
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain View Post
He still has 2 years left on his rookie contract left and if he hits the incentives on his 10 year extension, it is worth $477M for a potential TCV of $503M. Football is not baseball or basketball though. Contracts are not 100% guaranteed. Apparently the 2nd half of his contract extension is when the big money really kicks in and they can cut him if they don't want to pay it.
I wouldn't sign any player to a monster contract at this time. Too many uncertainties with COVID lingering. I also think the BLM reaction will turn off many fans.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 12:05 PM   #36
friendly fred
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 27, 2018
Location: Back in Texas!
Posts: 7,196
Encounters: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
The Kansas City Chiefs just signed their QB Patrick Mahomes to a $500 Million dollar extension for 10 years. That is a new record for team sports. Somebody is watching football, that is for sure.

The Super Bowl has the highest Nielson ratings of any Prime Time television program. The NFL will survive without you.
It has been surviving without me for the last decade as well.

Fuck the NFL²
friendly fred is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 12:11 PM   #37
friendly fred
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 27, 2018
Location: Back in Texas!
Posts: 7,196
Encounters: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain View Post
The kid deserves it. I thought I would not see anyone as talented as Aaron Rodgers anytime soon. Mahomes proved me wrong his 1st year as a starter. And yes, I do love watching the NFL. Unfortunately, I am a Cowboys fan so I guess I just like torturing myself and I definitely must love disappointment.
You have been proven wrong on many subjects, many times, in spite of your alleged 3 Ivy League degrees.

Assup says you like sucking his cock, though, as does Munchmasterman.
friendly fred is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 12:38 PM   #38
Lucas McCain
Valued Poster
 
Lucas McCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 11,167
Default

Gnadfly, I don't disagree. He had two years left on his rookie deal and they could have franchised him for another two years after his rookie deal was done. They had four more years of control over him.

I do understand why leadership wanted to gamble with him because if the salary cap keeps going up (it won't now with the virus because there obviously won't be any sold out stadiums for a while), he's just going to be much more expensive later because he is only 24 years old and already has a SB MVP and SB victory on his resume.
Lucas McCain is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 01:55 PM   #39
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

For those who complain about the Mahomes contract : It is a tenet of Capitalism that something is worth what another will pay for it.

The Chiefs athletic team owner think mahomes is worth the money. If they have the money - and wish to pay him - he is worth the money.

Until someone else decides to pay more.



Capitalism - not communism. The DPST's will nationalize all sports, and all athletes will be paid on a par of Megan Rapinoe . Tampons extra.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 03:05 PM   #40
Lucas McCain
Valued Poster
 
Lucas McCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 11,167
Default

Back to the topic; I never had a problem with Kap. I think he should have gone about it in a different way, but that's okay. He wanted to make a quiet but loud valid statement so I won't condemn him for that. It's not like he was putting up his middle finger during the anthem. To me, it was just an extremely subtle protest from an athlete.
Lucas McCain is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 06:32 PM   #41
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 45,243
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain View Post
Back to the topic; I never had a problem with Kap. I think he should have gone about it in a different way, but that's okay. He wanted to make a quiet but loud valid statement so I won't condemn him for that. It's not like he was putting up his middle finger during the anthem. To me, it was just an extremely subtle protest from an athlete.
He didn’t have a valid statement. The statistics bear that out. He said the US is an oppressive country. Fuck him.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the...sm-11591119883

There’s also a Harvard study. You know, an Ivy League school:

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fr...es_figures.pdf

CK is a complete fool. So are you for actually buying his bullshit.
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 07:12 PM   #42
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

harvard is only a Marxist factory now.

Its day as a premier educational institution are long gone.

Graduate and medical schools are very leery of harvard grads these days.

all they know is marxiswm.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 07:23 PM   #43
DFWClubgoer
Babtized in dirty water 💦
 
DFWClubgoer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 29, 2010
Location: Euless
Posts: 727
Encounters: 91
Default

Show me a hotel or casino that didn’t loose big in the first half of 2020.





Quote:
Originally Posted by matchingmole View Post
DFWClubgoer is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 07:23 PM   #44
bambino
BANNED
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 45,243
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11 View Post
harvard is only a Marxist factory now.

Its day as a premier educational institution are long gone.

Graduate and medical schools are very leery of harvard grads these days.

all they know is marxiswm.
Actually, the Harvard study doesn’t say police are racist. Their conclusion:


Conclusion
The issue of police violence and its racial incidence has become one of the most divisive topics in American discourse. Emotions run the gamut from outrage to indi↵erence. Yet, very little data exists to understand whether racial disparities in police use of force exist or might be explained by situational factors inherent in the complexity of police-civilian interactions. Beyond the lack of data, the analysis of police behavior is fraught with diculty including, but not limited to, the reliability of the data that does exist and the fact that one cannot randomly assign race.
With these caveats in mind, this paper takes first steps into the treacherous terrain of under- standing the nature and extent of racial di↵erences in police use of force and the probability of police interaction. On non-lethal uses of force, there are racial di↵erences – sometimes quite large – in police use of force, even after accounting for a large set of controls designed to account for important contextual and behavioral factors at the time of the police-civilian interaction. Interest- ingly, as use of force increases from putting hands on a civilian to striking them with a baton, the overall probability of such an incident occurring decreases dramatically but the racial di↵erence remains roughly constant. Even when ocers report civilians have been compliant and no arrest was made, blacks are 21.2 percent more likely to endure some form of force in an interaction. Yet, on the most extreme use of force – ocer-involved shootings – we are unable to detect any racial di↵erences in either the raw data or when accounting for controls.
We argue that these facts are most consistent with a model of taste-based discrimination in which police ocers face discretely higher costs for ocer-involved shootings relative to non-lethal uses of force. This model is consistent with racial di↵erences in the average returns to compliant behaviors, the results of our tests of discrimination based on Knowles, Persico, and Todd (2001) and Anwar and Fang (2006), and the fact that the odds-ratio is large and significant across all intensities of force – even after accounting for a rich set of controls. In the end, however, without randomly assigning race, we have no definitive proof of discrimination. Our results are also consistent with mismeasured contextual factors.
As police departments across America consider models of community policing such as the Boston Ten Point Coalition, body worn cameras, or training designed to purge ocers of implicit bias, our results point to another simple policy experiment: increase t.

Here’s the important sentence:


however, without randomly assigning race, we have no definitive proof of discrimination
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2020, 07:29 PM   #45
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

b - it states - White folks is 'racist' - in educational institution social work 'ese'.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved