Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 316
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 303
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71373
biomed168058
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455086
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49554
WTF48272
pyramider46430
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid40144
CryptKicker37405
Mokoa36512
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34719

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2021, 01:27 PM   #16
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post

Though we may be few in number, Libertarians and small government/free market Republicans are superior to both.
There are few to none...small government Republicans.

Only Libertarians are small government.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 01:38 PM   #17
GastonGlock
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 15, 2019
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,127
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
There are few to none...small government Republicans.
Because Neocons are Trotskyists
GastonGlock is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 02:25 PM   #18
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

Agreed
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 02:26 PM   #19
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,441
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GastonGlock View Post
Because Neocons are Trotskyists
Actually WTF is Trotsky. I noted that here a few days ago:

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Have you seen the deficits of the last 3 years and the one soon to be?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Damn, we're beginning to sound like Stalin and Trotsky. We're both deficit hawks and each is accusing the other of not being hawkish enough.

I'm Stalin btw.
I'll kind of agree with both of you. Trotskyites, who never saw a foreign intervention they didn't like, are like Neocons. But I don't see what that has to do with socialism or crony capitalism. Or noninterventionist Republicans, including Donald Trump if you disregard Iran.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 02:58 PM   #20
GastonGlock
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 15, 2019
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,127
Encounters: 15
Default

I'm "small and as local as you can get it" government, anti-socialism, anti-cronyism in politics, but am relatively pro-crony in business ventures if I get to build my own team. I think not using the resources you have to put people you collaborate really well with to ensure success is foolish. Giving your retarded delinquent of a nephew a job as a favor to your sister is bad for business.
GastonGlock is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 03:05 PM   #21
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Those who love the fiden crime cabal - and its' marxist policies - do not fit the definition of 'Libertarian"!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 03:16 PM   #22
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

If you disregard all those women Ted Bundy knocked in the head...he was a pretty good law student!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 03:18 PM   #23
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

7
Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11 View Post
Those who love the fiden crime cabal - and its' marxist policies - do not fit the definition of 'Libertarian"!
Correct but do not leave out Trump and his crony capitalists being excluded too.

If you think Trump and company are small government, your nuts are cracked.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 03:31 PM   #24
GastonGlock
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 15, 2019
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,127
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
If you think Trump and company are small government, your nuts are cracked.
Trump = small government? Nope. But he was relatively anti-interventionist and/or imperialist. Not completely, but moreso than the people he ran against and had to work with.
GastonGlock is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 04:06 PM   #25
winn dixie
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: Retired
Posts: 24,859
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
If you disregard all those women Ted Bundy knocked in the head...he was a pretty good law student!
Extremely sexist!
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 04:35 PM   #26
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GastonGlock View Post
Trump = small government? Nope. But he was relatively anti-interventionist and/or imperialist. Not completely, but moreso than the people he ran against and had to work with.
Yes Trump for the most part was an isolationist. But I couldn't help jabbing at Tiny's "excluding Iran" quip.


But you can't be big government and consider yourself a conserative imho. Trump supporters consider themselves conservative. I consider them full of shit in this regard .
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 07:32 PM   #27
intldjgig
Premium Access
 
intldjgig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2010
Location: Pandemonium
Posts: 1,236
Encounters: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
...As to the difference, Socialists want the government to have all the power. And crony capitalists also want the government to have all the power, just as long as government gives them rent seeking advantages.
Rockefeller Republican here. Your definition of Socialism is incorrect, at least in the Democratic Socialist standpoint. Socialism means that the state is the owner/controller of an industry’s production, but Democratic Socialism underlines that the PEOPLE control the government (an idea apparently foreign to many of its citizens). Reasonable minds can disagree with regards to which system produces the best outcomes for a sovereign’s citizens: lower outputs with universal profit sharing, or higher outputs with profits in the hands of a select group with any redistribution or benefit left to the voodoo of “Trickle-Down Economics”.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Though we may be few in number, Libertarians and small government/free market Republicans are superior to both.
LOL. Libertarians are among the most deluded individuals on the planet for their failure to distinguish between the hypothetically possible and the realistically probable. And the only fans of small governments and “free” markets are those who benefit from such and those who would sell organs/children to obtain those benefits.

In reality, any representative government with taxation powers contains some element of socialism. Otherwise, all roads would be literal tollways, Pinkertons would be the primary mode of law enforcement, and emergency rooms would check a patient’s ability to pay prior to admittance. Most of us have no problem with those who have more, as long as more is not acquired or maintained via the oppression of others.

So, no: I don’t have a problem with some elements of socialism. However, socialism (like any other means of power) requires constant scrutiny and diligence to ensure the fox in the hen house is a vegetarian.
intldjgig is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 08:05 PM   #28
Levianon17
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,925
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Yes Trump for the most part was an isolationist. But I couldn't help jabbing at Tiny's "excluding Iran" quip.


But you can't be big government and consider yourself a conserative imho. Trump supporters consider themselves conservative. I consider them full of shit in this regard .
For the record what would you like America to look like?
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 08:31 PM   #29
Ripmany
BANNED
 
Ripmany's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 17, 2018
Location: Ok
Posts: 4,601
Encounters: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
There are few to none...small government Republicans.

Only Libertarians are small government.
I vote libertarian every election. My chick never wins.
Ripmany is offline   Quote
Old 02-01-2021, 09:06 PM   #30
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,441
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by intldjgig View Post
Rockefeller Republican here. Your definition of Socialism is incorrect, at least in the Democratic Socialist standpoint. Socialism means that the state is the owner/controller of an industry’s production, but Democratic Socialism underlines that the PEOPLE control the government (an idea apparently foreign to many of its citizens). Reasonable minds can disagree with regards to which system produces the best outcomes for a sovereign’s citizens: lower outputs with universal profit sharing, or higher outputs with profits in the hands of a select group with any redistribution or benefit left to the voodoo of “Trickle-Down Economics”.



LOL. Libertarians are among the most deluded individuals on the planet for their failure to distinguish between the hypothetically possible and the realistically probable. And the only fans of small governments and “free” markets are those who benefit from such and those who would sell organs/children to obtain those benefits.

In reality, any representative government with taxation powers contains some element of socialism. Otherwise, all roads would be literal tollways, Pinkertons would be the primary mode of law enforcement, and emergency rooms would check a patient’s ability to pay prior to admittance. Most of us have no problem with those who have more, as long as more is not acquired or maintained via the oppression of others.

So, no: I don’t have a problem with some elements of socialism. However, socialism (like any other means of power) requires constant scrutiny and diligence to ensure the fox in the hen house is a vegetarian.
The definition of socialism is a system where the government controls and owns the means of production. It currently only exists in a relatively pure form in Cuba and North Korea. Why? Because it doesn't work. It created great poverty and suffering, and was abandoned.

Yeah, you look at the Libertarian platform, and there are parts of it that aren't practical and don't make sense. But those parts will never be implemented. You're not going to see public schools or public roads put out of business. Libertarianism is about social freedoms, the right of individuals to engage in behavior that doesn't harm others, and yes, smaller, less intrusive government. But it's a big tent philosophy. I personally believe in universal health care backed up by government, along the lines of Singapore's system, which provides universal coverage at a much lower cost and with much better outcomes than what we have in the USA, and I've seen praise for their system (and admittedly criticism as well) in Reason, the flagship Libertarian magazine.

What happens when a Libertarian is elected to public office? Well, there's only been one elected to a high executive office, Gary Johnson, ex-Governor of New Mexico, and he did a pretty damn good job. He ran as a Republican in a blue state and still won by 10%, in two elections. He wasn't afraid to take the axe to pork.

Contrary to your belief, smaller government and lower taxes can result in greater prosperity for all. Kick out petro states and small places, and Switzerland, Singapore and the USA have among the lowest taxes and lowest government spending as % of GDP of developed countries, and also the highest median income. Please note that's median, not average.

I'm not saying the USA should adopt the platform of the Libertarian Party. Yeah, I agree that wouldn't be ideal. But neither is what we have now.

And, really, fuck ideology. What's the point in arguing about socialism or libertarianism? How we should define them, how well they'd work? It's a little like an argument between early 20th century Marxists and Anarchists. To a large extent, they were both full of shit. What we need to do is implement what works. And some of that comes from the Libertarian playbook. For example, no, we don't need to privatize the schools. But charter schools and tuition vouchers in private schools for underprivileged children, that makes sense.

Btw, your contention that Libertarians are wild eyed ideologues who harvest organs is over the top.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved