CVS goes woke

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

You are conditioned by many generations to think that way. It’s simply a false narrative.

There’s no conditioning necessary, it just is. Were you conditioned to have 2 legs? 10 toes?

Primarily young girls? Gonna need to see some data on that.

Staff edit - Link removed

#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.

Eating disorders are also an issue tied to sexualizing young people, thanks for bringing that up! But not at all similar to recognizing that sex and gender are different. People are born a certain sex. Gender is a social construct. Again, you are so conditioned to this thinking that you can’t see it.

Again with the “conditioned”, but the answer is the same. Some things are just simple truths, regardless of how some refuse to acknowledge them.

And the whole and I believe you have more intellect than to actually say that out loud anywhere other than here.

It should be a simple query then, no need to avoid it.

Using the term “Cis” men is 100 percent appropriate in this and most scenarios.

Only to people who deny a couple hundred thousand years of basic biology. It’s completely unnecessary to the rest.

[Jacuzzme]

Dupe

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

Thank you.

Anytime. You are welcome.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Berry, anyone with a modicum of common sense wouldn't make those kind of blanket statements and assertions.

No. Anyone with common sense understands the increased risk. Those that simply want to defend this insanity no matter what, do not.

Originally Posted by HDGristle

when it's at best an ultra-rare risk on par with other ultra-rare risks.

Oh, so now you do agree it is an increased risk. You just don't think it will happen enough. Cool. Tell that to the innocent women victim who is assaulted thanks to this ridiculous CVS policy. I am sure she will be thrilled

[HDGristle]

No. It's already an existing risk. There are vastly higher risk things you're glossing over while you fixate on this.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

No. It's already an existing risk.

Ummm, that is not what you said. But ok, if you want to backtrack, have at it

As to other risks, sure there are all kind of risks in life. That doesn't mean we should ignore ones like CVS putting women at risk with this insane policy

[Jacuzzme]

I’m not sure that CVS in particular is the issue, it’s more the precedent they and others are setting.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by berryberry

Ummm, that is not what you said. But ok, if you want to backtrack, have at it

As to other risks, sure there are all kind of risks in life. That doesn't mean we should ignore ones like CVS putting women at risk with this insane policy

I said in posts 18 and 22 that it was already an existing risk. You're pushing that risk increased. It hasn't. And it remains an ultra-rare risk on par with other ultra-rare risks.

This doesn't have any material change on the risk profile. Do you really not understand why?

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

I’m not sure that CVS in particular is the issue, it’s more the precedent they and others are setting.

Correct. CVS is just one of a number of examples

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

You're pushing that risk increased. It hasn't.

That is just not true. But if you want to believe that, have at it.

[HDGristle]

Then please walk us through the increase with specifics, and lay out your key assumptions and the limitations of your analysis so we can all understand why.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Then please walk us through the increase

I have already done so previously in this thread. You just don't agree with the conclusion

Allowing a man who is mentally disturbed enough to think he is a woman to go in and invade a woman's privacy and put them in a vulnerable situation by going into in a restroom or locker room alone with them, puts women at greater risk.

We have already read about some tranny athlete's exposing themselves, leering at women watching them get undressed, etc. in women's locker rooms.

Again, anyone with a modicum of common sense understands the increased risk. If you had daughters, would you want some man who is mentally disturbed sharing a bathroom and locker room with them alone?

[Dreamgurrl]

Originally Posted by berryberry

I have already done so previously in this thread. You just don't agree with the conclusion

Allowing a man who is mentally disturbed enough to think he is a woman to go in and invade a woman's privacy and put them in a vulnerable situation by going into in a restroom or locker room alone with them, puts women at greater risk.

We have already read about some tranny athlete's exposing themselves, leering at women watching them get undressed, etc. in women's locker rooms.

Again, anyone with a modicum of common sense understands the increased risk. If you had daughters, would you want some man who is mentally disturbed sharing a bathroom and locker room with them alone?

If you were to hold the same outrage for women and girls being exposed to pedophiles/perverts/rapists/sexual offenders etc in their everyday lives, then perhaps we could understand your stance.

[HDGristle]

I see. So you're not willing or attempting to have a real or nuanced discussion regarding the specifics.

Are they in any different danger in the break room? Or the corridor to the restrooms? The parking lot after hours? In any on-site gym facilities? In the back left corner of the warehouse with spotty camera coverage? In a locked, single occupant restroom?

How about the manager's office behind the mirrored one way glass?

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

If you were to hold the same outrage for women and girls being exposed to pedophiles/perverts/rapists/sexual offenders etc in their everyday lives, then perhaps we could understand your stance.

And how exactly do you know I do not?

Because I certainly do hold the same outrage towards pedophiles, rapists, sexual offenders. They are all disgusting individuals that are a menace to society and should be locked away