Georgia Election Problems - Continued...

[Lucas McCain]

Salty, I understand the process just fine. I suggest you understand it better other than "Trump wants it so it must be good." It is hardly as simple as you believe it to be which is why I think it will get shot down in court.

[Yssup Rider]

Headed for a lengthy court battle. However, it’s unlikely Georgia will be the determining state in this election. So if they want to spend the next three years litigating it, they can.

Salty, I hear they have pretty fair Aussie tucker down in GA. Maybe you can get a gig there watching over the whoule processe.

[yeahsurewhatev]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... You mis-understand - however, I may not have been clear.
It's each precinct counting the number of actual ballots
to make sure it's the same number of vote tabulations
before the official signs off on the total.

... And they could keep a "running count" and then
just verify it. ... How long can it take to count-up
a thousand ballots? ... Half-the-hour??

##### Salty

Why not take the time to have a clue what you're talking about? No, they can't keep a "running count" since the law requires the ballots be placed in a sealed box to be opened after voting is complete in order to do the count. Just making shit up makes for a shit argument.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

I'd buy all the allegations of cheating in GA hook, line, and sinker when NaCl-y smacks down the million dollars that Tejas LtGuv is paying for the proof of such.

Come on salty, why are you pushing for pennies on ad revenue click bait here when you can fully fund this whole site ad infinitum by ponying up that proof?

You baffle me.

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Once again - this thread concerns the Georgia elections.
Your sad attempts to either hijack or sabotage this thread
add .. er... Precious Little to the discussion.

Please stay on-topic or start yer-own thread.

#### Salty

My response is dead on when it concerns the topic of this post.



You ante up that proof positive to LtGuv of Tejas, you get a BIG pay off, you show the world that election was stolen, you get to stop working your ass off of pennies on ad revenue here, you get to treat all your maggie buddies (you know, the ones that have 1 or less reviews) to the opportunity to touching a real live woman.

And most of all, you will get me to finally say I was wrong and hoist your banner.

And all it takes if for you to deliver the proof to Danny Boy Patrick.

[txdot-guy]

I see a lot of people referencing Dan Patrick’s offer to pay for tips leading to election fraud convictions. Are we sure that it’s still valid?


P.S. Dan Patrick has paid out at least once.
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick pays out $25,000 to Democrat who reported Republican voter fraud

By Kelly Mena, CNN. Updated 9:09 PM EDT, Fri October 22, 2021
—
A week after the 2020 election, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick announced that he was offering up to $1 million – paid from his campaign account – “to incentivize, encourage and reward people to come forward and report voter fraud.”

Nearly a year later, Patrick, a Republican, has paid out his first reward: $25,000 to a Democrat in Pennsylvania, who reported a man for voting twice.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/22/polit...ard/index.html

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by yeahsurewhatev

Why not take the time to have a clue what you're talking about? No, they can't keep a "running count" since the law requires the ballots be placed in a sealed box to be opened after voting is complete in order to do the count. Just making shit up makes for a shit argument.

... Are YOU totally LOST on this issue??

... A running count - of the number of physical ballots
- AND- the number of people who were checked in on the
Electronic Poll books.

THAT is what I mean by a "running count" - to ensure
that the same number of actual votes - matches the
number of people checked in.
And you make sure the count matches up correctly
before you sign off on it.

... See? ... That-way Fulton County and a few other
Precincts won't have those "counting problems" and
phantom tabulations and missing ballots like they
did last time.

##### Salty

[Yssup Rider]

Do you not understand that what you’re reporting is impossible, both physically and legally?

[yeahsurewhatev]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Are YOU totally LOST on this issue??

... A running count - of the number of physical ballots
- AND- the number of people who were checked in on the
Electronic Poll books.

THAT is what I mean by a "running count" - to ensure
that the same number of actual votes - matches the
number of people checked in.
And you make sure the count matches up correctly
before you sign off on it.

... See? ... That-way Fulton County and a few other
Precincts won't have those "counting problems" and
phantom tabulations and missing ballots like they
did last time.

##### Salty

I see my mistake: you're talking about the “issue”; I went and read the actual law.

The law only requires a hand count of the number of paper ballots to square that number with all the electronic tabulations. That count must be carried out by three people—all three counts and the electronic tabulations must match--and can only begin when all voting at a precinct polling location is complete.

As burdensome and prone to errors as Georgia's new system is, at least they will have the physical ballots to consult to rectify those errors, so the only harm should be delay. Yours seems to put the opportunity for error on steroids, especially since the running count would be ephemeral (don't know if you're skipping the final--break the seal on the ballot box--count) and nearly guarantees confusion and delay. Of course, that may be just the "issue" you hope to create, rather than rectify.

[Salty Again]

... No need to apologise there, mate.

You DO understand WHY the reason for this, yes?

... The "match-up" was NOT done in the 2020 election.
Causing "lost votes" and WRONG number counts.

And STILL waiting to see the ballots from Fulton County.
But, we'll see 'em when President Trump orders the
Federal Investigation next year... Or when Raffensperger
rolls-over and admits that we're correct on the issue.

#### Salty

[HDGristle]

He won't because you're not

[yeahsurewhatev]

Wow. He understands even less than I thought he did. Not quite sure whose educational system to blame for that mess.

[Salty Again]

... Blimey! .. So, the Georgia State Elections Board has just
subpoenaed Fulton County's 2020 Election records.

Now, perhaps we'll get to the TRUTH on Fulton's double counting
procedures and other odd problems there... And the ballots that
"we" still want to see.

And lest we forget that Fani's "honey-boo" Mr. Nathan Wade
has his questioning by the House Judiciary Committee coming
Tuesday 15 October.

#### Salty

[Yssup Rider]

Already have it.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Blimey! .. So, the Georgia State Elections Board has just
subpoenaed Fulton County's 2020 Election records.

Now, perhaps we'll get to the TRUTH on Fulton's double counting
procedures and other odd problems there... And the ballots that
"we" still want to see.

And lest we forget that Fani's "honey-boo" Mr. Nathan Wade
has his questioning by the House Judiciary Committee coming
Tuesday 15 October.

#### Salty

Would you PLEASE cite links to support your claims.

[Salty Again]

... The State of Georgia Elections Board may have this information
on their website, mate - or take a gecko at the Atlanta Journal
Constitution for details. ... And the House Judiciary Committee
might make mention of Nathan Wade's upcoming visit - which is
scheduled for this Tuesday, 15 October.

#### Salty