Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
George Spelvin 305
Starscream66 300
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 262
Top Posters
DallasRain71300
biomed167382
Yssup Rider62688
gman4454869
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49424
WTF48272
pyramider46416
bambino45152
The_Waco_Kid39678
CryptKicker37384
Mokoa36499
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg33879

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-20-2025, 12:18 AM   #46
pxmcc
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 10,368
Encounters: 55
Default

i don't pretend to be a gun expert, but yes i've shot an assault rifle-fully auto-and semi-auto ar-15 style. i'm pretty sure you know i was referring to semi auto ar-style with a high capacity magazine. there is no need for those. they're designed for war and killing people. that's it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
since you don't actually know what an assault rifle really is and that you can't own one anyway casts your comment into irrelevance considering most gun violence is committed with handguns



so ban those nasty "assault rifles" that don't exist and see what difference it makes?








is this an excuse or a solution?



still waiting for any sensible guns laws that would prevent this.
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 12:24 AM   #47
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 39,678
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
i don't pretend to be a gun expert, but yes i've shot an assault rifle-fully auto-and semi-auto ar-15 style. i'm pretty sure you know i was referring to semi auto ar-style with a high capacity magazine. there is no need for those. they're designed for war and killing people. that's it.

no you haven't unless you did so illegally or shot a full auto assault rifle owned by a FFL dealer.

so which is it?

you like many on the left think anything that is semi-auto is an assault rifle.


you are wrong
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 01:30 AM   #48
pxmcc
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 10,368
Encounters: 55
Default

i have 2 nephews in the Seals
and my little bro was an mh-60 aircraft commander before he retired from the Navy. those dudes are on a different level.

legal? no. do i care? no. do i think ar-s should be legal? nope.

you hold the trigger down. you don't have to be einstein to shoot fully auto. you just have to be a little crazy, which i am. and my peeps have what i'd call psychotic discipline.

back on topic. why should ARs be legal for civilians? for what possible purpose?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
no you haven't unless you did so illegally or shot a full auto assault rifle owned by a FFL dealer.

so which is it?

you like many on the left think anything that is semi-auto is an assault rifle.


you are wrong
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 03:48 AM   #49
ICU 812
BANNED
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,527
Encounters: 15
Default

Again I ask: If we assume that ownership of "weapons of war" or even all firearms is prohibited to civilians . . .how would those guns already in the legal possession of citizens be collected?

And then, how would those firearms not legally owned by gang members and career criminals be collected?

For the sake of this discussion, please ignore the technical issues of our legal system.ASsume that it may be done legally . . .now, how
ICU 812 is offline   Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 04:06 AM   #50
pxmcc
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 10,368
Encounters: 55
Default

simple. gun buybacks. undercover ops for gang bangers. full mfg liability for any new assault rifles sold which result in the commission of a crime. the mass slaughter gun scourge is over. sellers are going to do serious due diligence before another AR-15 is sold.

better yet, make the sale of ar-15s a felony. no more assault rifles sold. no more mass slaughter. and make getting a gun license harder than a DL.

still gun deaths but nowhere near as bad.

present system is planned insanity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812 View Post
Again I ask: If we assume that ownership of "weapons of war" or even all firearms is prohibited to civilians . . .how would those guns already in the legal possession of citizens be collected?

And then, how would those firearms not legally owned by gang members and career criminals be collected?

For the sake of this discussion, please ignore the technical issues of our legal system.ASsume that it may be done legally . . .now, how
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2025, 09:37 AM   #51
ICU 812
BANNED
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,527
Encounters: 15
Default

^^^^

Ok, I get all that . . .sounds good.

What about all those folks who don't want to give up their firearms? How will they be identified and forced to surrender teem?

My Dad was a Kennedy liberal and center of the road straight arrow kind of guy. Back in the 1860s there was much debate about gun control following the three major assignations of that decade, JFK, RFK and MLK. No one knew what the new law would really look ike. Gun ban=s and confiscation were seriously discussed.

One evening I found my father hammering away at a short coffin looking box in his basement "workshop". Now Dad was not a handyman or craftsmen. This was unusual. What was he doing?

Well at that time, he had two shotguns, a .22 rifle and a "spiritized" surplus German Mauser rifle for Deer hunting. This last one was a no-shit "Weapon of war" from WW-II. If confiscation was to become the law of the land, he told me that these guns would go into the box and the box would go into the ground behind the Peony bushes.

It is now some fifty five years later on and, based on the many YouTube videos out there, a lot of folks still feel that way.

What can e done about them?
ICU 812 is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2025, 10:04 AM   #52
LayingPipe
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 1, 2022
Location: Mancave,NY
Posts: 537
Default

The gun was owned by his stepmother a Leon County Sheriff's deputy.With a srewball kid in the house keeping the weapon secured probably would have been the responsible thing to do.I would expect a civil lawsuit by the victims families
LayingPipe is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2025, 11:48 AM   #53
ICU 812
BANNED
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,527
Encounters: 15
Default

^^^

Ok, and so what should be done about that?
ICU 812 is offline   Quote
Old 04-26-2025, 05:55 AM   #54
Brot
Valued Poster
 
Brot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 3, 2010
Posts: 1,126
Encounters: 23
Default

Waiting period and background checks.


Gun owners should be licensed and pay an annual tax for assault weapons. https://thegunzone.com/what-is-an-as...ording-to-atf/



Disclaimer: I have multiple guns including an old school assault rifle.
Brot is offline   Quote
Old 04-26-2025, 07:24 AM   #55
ICU 812
BANNED
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,527
Encounters: 15
Default

Good stuff . . .So, you would create requirements for firearms in general that are similar to those for CCW permits in effect now in many states?

Would that be a national law?

Would that stand up to a 2A challenge, or the equal protection clause?

Would kit stad p to a challenge on the basis of civil rights laws concerning discrimination?

Just looking for a workable approach here.

****************************** ******

However, I'd like to again ask those who favor a ban on private ownership of firearms to explain how this ban would be enforced against non-complient gun owners?
ICU 812 is offline   Quote
Old 04-26-2025, 08:53 AM   #56
sand247
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Aug 9, 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,006
Encounters: 57
Default

To interject some reason on this topic, the murder rate per capita is 6 ish per mil in the UK, US is about 10X That. But, once you remove the crime murder statistics during a crime, IE gang related, narco related etc, that drops to a similar rate of 10ish per mil. Accounting for similar variations in the UK only drops that to 4.5 per mil. So violent crime is bigger there than here.

Further remove dense population centers with urban decay, IE chicago and the like, that drops even further. For 90% of the USA, we live in a safer space than the UK and other like countries with heavy gun control.

This ties into the topic with the understanding that criminals will be criminals. Add all the gun laws you like and they will still murder, you and each other, in similar rates. Only the methodology changes, not the outcome.

I will absolutely agree that it will reduce mass shootings, as most of those are perpetrated by mentally ill people, that had easy access to a gun. Although most are carried out with handguns.

Food for thought.
sand247 is offline   Quote
Old 04-26-2025, 10:38 AM   #57
jayjaychrome
Premium Access
 
jayjaychrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 150
Encounters: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812 View Post
Good stuff . . .So, you would create requirements for firearms in general that are similar to those for CCW permits in effect now in many states?

Would that be a national law?

Would that stand up to a 2A challenge, or the equal protection clause?

Would kit stad p to a challenge on the basis of civil rights laws concerning discrimination?

Just looking for a workable approach here.

****************************** ******

However, I'd like to again ask those who favor a ban on private ownership of firearms to explain how this ban would be enforced against non-complient gun owners?
Repealing 2A would be a good start
jayjaychrome is online now   Quote
Old 04-26-2025, 07:42 PM   #58
ICU 812
BANNED
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,527
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayjaychrome View Post
Repealing 2A would be a good start
That would be the first step . .so get to it!

Next: What would be the process for confiscating firearms from non-compliant citizens?
ICU 812 is offline   Quote
Old 04-28-2025, 06:37 PM   #59
Why_Yes_I_Do
BANNED
 
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2013
Location: Railroad Tracks, other side thereof
Posts: 7,891
Encounters: 14
Default What if factual history was a thing?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
...i'm pretty sure you know i was referring to semi auto ar-style with a high capacity magazine. there is no need for those. they're designed for war and killing people. that's it.
Gonna hit a few other comments, but let us start with yours. If you and other uniformed people would be so kind as to show us underlings the words:
  • Bunny Rabbit or
  • Deer or
  • Antelope or
  • Game Birds or
  • Any Other frick'n Animal
As they appears in any the following:
  • Declaration of Independence
  • US Constitution
  • Bill of Rights
  • Federalist Papers
  • Any other writings of the Founding Fathers
That would be great...

Let us be crystal clear -- The Second Amendment was very specifically about, and only about, weapons of war. Period, end of discussion. Game Over.

Second Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Just to be clear, a comma, as used at the time, was basically equivalent to an and. Besides, we've all seen the Mel Gibson (Ambassador to L.A.) movie, The Patriot. AmmIrite? If said weapons could also put dinner on the table -- Double Bonus!

Don't believe me?!? Take it from the Billy Mays of his time, i.e. Alexander Hamilton, who authored 85 Federalist papers, in an effort to sell ratification of the US Constitution to the then thirteen States. 85 commercials to do so, plus one Bill of Rights. Otherwise, there was No Deal to be had.

See Federalist 29 below:
Quote:
Concerning the Militia
From the Daily Advertiser.
Thursday, January 10, 1788
HAMILTON

...THE power of regulating the militia, and of commanding its services in times of insurrection and invasion are natural incidents to the duties of superintending the common defense, and of watching over the internal peace of the Confederacy...
In point of actual fact, the States were entirely against a standing army riding heard over sovereign Americans. Say! Did you catch that bit about "invasion" above? Welcome to today.

So to another area; machine guns, i.e. full-auto: Yes Virginia, they are legal to own. They are very expensive to acquire (typically $15K+), require that a certain part, the seer, be manufactured before 1985 and require a tax, i.e. tax stamp, which takes over 2 years to process, in a good year.

Frankly, their functionality is questionable in my mind as they spew about 90-120 rounds in a skinny minute and are very difficulty to control with much accuracy. Personally, I would say no to full-auto, so long as we can have select fire, i.e. 3 round burst and single round as an option, known as select fire. Doubtless, you've seen the rage-heads spray'n and pray'n over their heads with their AKs without to much as a cursory sighting in?

Some say "High Capacity" like it means something. What about 7 rounds? That seems reasonable. AmIrite?!? Alrighty then. So a 12 gauge shot gun with 3 1/2" shells of 00-buck, should be fine, even though that would limit it to 150+ yards, with 9 30 caliber slugs per shot x 7 rounds. What about a 20 round drum, for kicks?

But my own recommendation is learning the many laws concerning idiot management before one tries to wrap a couple brain cells around basic weapons, their designs and practical intended purpose.

As to buy-backs; I paraphrase Charlton Heston: Cold dead hand beotches.
Why_Yes_I_Do is offline   Quote
Old 04-28-2025, 07:04 PM   #60
pxmcc
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 10,368
Encounters: 55
Default

^^you proved my point sir. thank you! if you're a member of a well-regulated militia, a.k.a., the National Guard, then you are authorized to have weapons of war.

notice it doesn't say the same about every clown and his brother..

maybe you should propose a Constitutional Amendment to the 2nd Amendment more to your liking:

"so that every clown and his brother can have weapons of war, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.."
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved