Charlie Kirk shot, another conservative assassination attempt.

[Devo]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

A truer statement would be hard to find. But it happens every day all over the world. Denying its existence is counterproductive. Knowing that your words can get you killed is something everyone should be aware of.

Consider John Lennon. He was killed because of his words and lifestyle. And he preached peace and love.

Yeah, its known as, "Situational awareness", something I practice everywhere I go, because I may be able to avert a crime, yall say its paranoia, but now you are preaching it.

You know why I dont wear MAGA hats?

It's because I dont want kill someone with TDS that physically attacks me for expressing a political opinion.

WHERE I agree specifically is that CK didnt appreciate the level of hatred his speech created.

If the environment calls for you to wear a class 4 armored vest, you WEAR IT, in this case, after viewing the video, its unlikely even if body armor could have saved him.

SO, we are now at the point of necessitating clear armored glass in front of every public figure making a speech.

That is some third world bananna republic shit.

I believe that to be unacceptable.

[HDGristle]

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Devo

So, the close up video is circulating on social media of Charlie being shot.

Have any of you watched it?

Thoughts?

yes. i once watched raw video of that british journalist beheaded by those fucktard islamists in Afghanistan. you only need to watch something like that once to be absolutely certain how evil these people are.

Originally Posted by HDGristle

https://www.kcra.com/article/charlie...tions/66043005

Nancy Pelosi has denounced the violence, even though Kirk spread all sorts of conspiracies about the attack on her husband and advocated for his listeners the bail put the attacker.

That says a lot

The Hoffman family, has spoken out against it as well. Having lived through this kind of tragedy themselves.

it says that Pelosi is too savvy not to say the politically correct response. what do you think she thinks privately?

[Devo]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

yes. i once watched raw video of that british journalist beheaded by those fucktard islamists in Afghanistan. you only need to watch something like that once to be absolutely certain how evil these people are.







it says that Pelosi is too savvy not to say the politically correct response. what do you think she thinks privately?

Pelosi, likely has no thoughts on this until her handlers tell her what to say.

Honestly, the Lefts public statements on the assassination, decrying it, is expected at the higher levels of government and ex government people.

At home, they have a completely different take on it, because that's all they can ever be.

[HDGristle]

That's just more us vs them tribalism instead of building bridges

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Devo

Pelosi, likely has no thoughts on this until her handlers tell her what to say.

Honestly, the Lefts public statements on the assassination, decrying it, is expected at the higher levels of government and ex government people.

At home, they have a completely different take on it, because that's all they can ever be.

Considering that Paul Pelosi, Nancy’s husband, was confronted at home and almost bludgeoned to death with a hammer I think that she has plenty to say about it. The fact that you think she has handlers telling her what to say is one of the most insulting things i’ve seen in this thread.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Devo

I agree, but you only have to see the far left opinions of this assassination of a Conservative, over speech to see that division is preferable to those who have only that intent.

If one side has the foregone intent to never agree to get along, then naturally people will note that, and lobby against it.

Thats what Charlie Kirk did, he used facts to embarrass stupid people with stupid political ideology based on rhetoric, not facts.

And yes, he embarrassed them, as well they should have been.

But he was CORRECT.

He spoke truth, and was killed for it.

I dont want to live among people who accept death over politics, that's called Anarchy.

... GREAT post, mate!

#### Salty

[Devo]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Considering that Paul Pelosi, Nancy’s husband, was confronted at home and almost bludgeoned to death with a hammer I think that she has plenty to say about it. The fact that you think she has handlers telling her what to say is one of the most insulting things i’ve seen in this thread.

Oh well, sorry the perp used a blunt instrument, instead of a rifle, I agree we need more hammer control, proof of compentcy to carry as a weapon such things as a hammer, on the other hand, there is no Constitutional Amendment guaranteeing the right to own a hammer.

Unless of course you use it as a self defense weapon.

The same way you can assert a right to self defense in a school in PA, IF you have a state issued concealed carry permit.

[eyecu2]

Off topic. It's about Charlie Kirk not Pelosi. I realize that anxieties are high, but the fact is that the post is about Kirk and not /Pelosi or her husband

[eyecu2]

Duplicate

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

All these leftists here trying to rationalize taking this young man’s life. Bunch of sick fucks.

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe."

"So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one." - Charlie Kirk

----

He said this within hours of a school shooting in Tennessee. He loved to rationalize gun violence every day. Your pearl clutching really has no place here. Charlie Kirk is the reason Charlie Kirk got shot.

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by Devo

Oh well, sorry the perp used a blunt instrument, instead of a rifle, I agree we need more hammer control, proof of compentcy to carry as a weapon such things as a hammer, on the other hand, there is no Constitutional Amendment guaranteeing the right to own a hammer.

Unless of course you use it as a self defense weapon.

The same way you can assert a right to self defense in a school in PA, IF you have a state issued concealed carry permit.

Oddly enough, more people are killed by blunt instruments than the weapons the left has such a hard on for.

Tommy, your celebration of constant attempts to justify death and political violence are concerning, to say the least.

[onawbtngr546]

FBI had released two suspects already. FBI is a joke.
this is starting to look more like an actual assassination attempt, unlike with the kid in Butler.


Maybe trump did this to move attention away from the epstein files?

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Oddly enough, more people are killed by blunt instruments than the weapons the left has such a hard on for.

Tommy, your celebration of constant attempts to justify death and political violence are concerning, to say the least.

Which blunt objects, of who's primary purpose is to kill or harm others, kills more than guns? Hammers? Hammers are a tool. Pots and pans? Those are also a tool. You're saying 'heavy objects kill people!'... sure, they do. But they aren't intended to. Whereas guns kill people, and guns are ONLY intended to kill people. Hunting? Killing. Self defense? Killing. Wake up. What happened yesterday wasn't a case of an unattended gun loading itself, aiming, and firing itself at someone.

[oldman2525]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

There's over a decade of examples, but this covers just a tiny snippet. Not something I'd advocate shooting him over.

https://portal.csun.edu/faculty_staf...1-656aa6dd0efd

Covers what? And opinion piece?

Kirk called out many people regardless of their skin color or ethnic background. I might add he called out alot of churches and their views also
Doesn't make him a racist as u suggest or this piece of shit opinion piece x e which proves nothing other than u have squat

[Jacuzzme]

Kirk is dead because he was one of the best at calmly, politely, and convincingly walking young people into the reality that the garbage they’ve been fed for years in public schools is destructive to their own futures and that of their country’s. That was wholly unacceptable to the powers that be and those already irreparably damaged.