My pleasure to announce the death of another left-wing-nut narrative

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Depends on the round used, a shot like that can go right through the body, and you aren't hitting multiple organs. It would hurt and do damage but not instant death unless you hit the heart or artery. And like mentioned no way of shooter to know if he was protected by a vest.

Kirk was not wearing a vest. it's clear he had a tshirt on. he had no reason to expect what happened

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Absolutely. 200 yds to the chest with a 30/06 his organs would explode and it’s the easiest shot. If he had any type of training, even hunting, he’d have gone center mass.

it's the standard kill shot for a sniper. it's also the basic shot for infantrymen too for a reason. it works.

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Agreed about the vest there, and it didn't seem
like the aim was centre-mass... Which is why I also
believe this was a head shot that just missed.

#### Salty

more proof it was not a pro shooter just some angry pro trans dickhead

[royamcr]

He absolutely could have worn low profile armor under that shirt.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Kirk was not wearing a vest. it's clear he had a tshirt on. he had no reason to expect what happened






it's the standard kill shot for a sniper. it's also the basic shot for infantrymen too for a reason. it works.





more proof it was not a pro shooter just some angry pro trans dickhead

[VitaMan]

This is material for the political forum ?

[golferguy55]

^^^^
Anything you want to add to the thread topic or do you just want to complain?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by royamcr

He absolutely could have worn low profile armor under that shirt.

the video disproves it. you want to believe what didn't happen. for obvious reasons

Originally Posted by VitaMan

This is material for the political forum ?

yes

Originally Posted by golferguy55

^^^^
Anything you want to add to the thread topic or do you just want to complain?

no and yes


bahahaha

[VitaMan]

You are so cute. Must be butt hurt

This thread is a better fit for a gun magazine

[royamcr]

You haven't seen this video? It shows a rounded corner object under his shirt. When hit you can see the plate bounce and stretch the logo on the shirt.

The theory is the bullet hit his top left corner of the plate and bounced up and tore a hole in his neck and vessel.

If it was a true neck shot there would be an exit wound on the back side.

https://pollywebart.com/watch-slow-m...rTvfDf5WXo15yA

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

the video disproves it. you want to believe what didn't happen. for obvious reasons






yes





no and yes


bahahaha

[69in2it69]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Kirk was not wearing a vest. it's clear he had a tshirt on. he had no reason to expect what happened






it's the standard kill shot for a sniper. it's also the basic shot for infantrymen too for a reason. it works.





more proof it was not a pro shooter just some angry pro trans dickhead

Evidence

• Evidence refers to facts, signs, or objects that support a belief or proposition.
• It is often used in legal contexts to indicate information that points to guilt or innocence.
• Examples include witness testimonies, documents, and physical objects.

Proof

• Proof is the conclusion or result derived from evidence.
• It establishes certainty about a fact beyond a reasonable doubt.
• In legal terms, proof is what convinces a judge or jury of a fact's truth.

So, it would also be proof that the dumpster's poor little ear stunt was a staged operation by Retardlicans, right? He missed from half the distance.

[VitaMan]

Ridiculous comment as the shooter was killed. Usually shooters don't get killed in poor little stunts

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

You are so cute. Must be butt hurt

This thread is a better fit for a gun magazine

if you say so

Originally Posted by VitaMan

Ridiculous comment as the shooter was killed. Usually shooters don't get killed in poor little stunts

exactly.

Originally Posted by royamcr

You haven't seen this video? It shows a rounded corner object under his shirt. When hit you can see the plate bounce and stretch the logo on the shirt.

The theory is the bullet hit his top left corner of the plate and bounced up and tore a hole in his neck and vessel.

If it was a true neck shot there would be an exit wound on the back side.

https://pollywebart.com/watch-slow-m...rTvfDf5WXo15yA

why everyone has heard of pollywebart! why they are so famous they don't have a bias rating ... at all. bahahaa


let's see what the FBI and Utah police say about Kirk wearing a vest or not and the medical examiner's report.



and what difference at this point does it make?

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by 69in2it69

Evidence

• Evidence refers to facts, signs, or objects that support a belief or proposition.
• It is often used in legal contexts to indicate information that points to guilt or innocence.
• Examples include witness testimonies, documents, and physical objects.

Proof

• Proof is the conclusion or result derived from evidence.
• It establishes certainty about a fact beyond a reasonable doubt.
• In legal terms, proof is what convinces a judge or jury of a fact's truth.

So, it would also be proof that the dumpster's poor little ear stunt was a staged operation by Retardlicans, right? He missed from half the distance.

Conclusion I've read on the president shooting is the bullet hit a telepropmpter and a piece of glass from it hit his ear.

The reason I believe this is the simulations shortly after of a near miss of an ear would have destroyed the ear lobe. The shockwave of the bullet alone would have pulverized the soft tissue of the ear. And that doesn't grow back. It could be reconstructed with plastic surgery to look sort of normal but it would take months to look just ok, and might need a couple surgeries to get right. His ear was healed up from whatever hit it in a few weeks.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by royamcr

...like mentioned no way of shooter to know if he was protected by a vest.

Disagree totally. It would have been totally visible, given the level needed. It's not like he was wearing a polar parka. He was wearing a T-shirt.

You must watch too much John Wick flicks.

[royamcr]

Just armchair experting here. We may never get a full ballistics report with video due to the sensitive nature.

I don't think we ever got a full report on trump either. Trump wants the narrative to be a near miss bullet cause it looks better than getting hit from a piece of glass.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

if you say so





exactly.







why everyone has heard of pollywebart! why they are so famous they don't have a bias rating ... at all. bahahaa


let's see what the FBI and Utah police say about Kirk wearing a vest or not and the medical examiner's report.



and what difference at this point does it make?

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

This is material for the political forum ?

You thought it was an apolitical rando that got bushwhacked, by another apolitical whack-job? This didn't happen in Baltimore or Chitcago on an average, random weekend. Also obvious on how quick some are compelled, no - commanded, to make it about Trump.

But, the OP was more geared towards the death of the AR15 narrative, i.e. being so super scary looking, holds a million rounds and is full auto, like a gatling gun, compared to something that is basically a single shooter and has been in use since the turn of the last century, yet is readily available globally.

Basically, it is an actual weapon of war, unlike the AR15, as the left-wing-nuts claim constantly in hyperventilating short breaths.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

You are so cute. Must be butt hurt...

What exactly is your contribution to the OP topic?
But, good to know the hallways are safe under your watchful eye Karen.

But let's say the choice is between you and Time magazine:

TIME Cover After Charlie Kirk Assassination:
‘Enough,’ ‘Political Violence Haunting America’



What were your pointless questions again??