Charlie Kirk shot for debatign ideas

[Jacuzzme]

Dupe

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

You know, I meant that in a kind of lighthearted way. As in, you should be sorry you spent that much time compiling a list of grievances and responding to each one. And then you tried to insult me by calling me a maggie. But since I never voted for nor liked or supported your obsession, you not only didn't do that, you exposed yourself for the ignorant partisan that you are. Not that anyone here had any questions about that.

Aw. So rare to see maggies being lighthearted. You gotta admit that it would be like barbar to a Greek
But my posting history is noted here. What you call a list of grievances is what I do when I haven't logged in for a minute and catch up on the hijinx of this site and responds to those post I choose. So, that's boo on you.

And insult? Why don't you go through and document the heavy list of adjectives you maggies use. Maggie is my term of choice. But maggies are all about free speech...when it applies to them. If it comes from others, it better to fawn over how maggies can do no wrong else they shake the powers they think they have to do pettiness on the ill speakers.

But enlighten us with your free speech ability and tell all of us what vote and obsession that I have done. I *REALLY* want to hear this.

I guess you are saying you are a card carrying repub. Is that right? If so, you would be a hypocrite calling me partisan. I have stated in the past, and I will do it for your benefit now so as you don't have to search, that I vote for who *I* think is the best candidate at the time. Regardless of party affiliation.

Pretty partisan, eh?

Originally Posted by Lantern2814

What a pile of garbage. The shooter has been shown to be one of YOURS despite all you leftists repeating the lie you've been told to tell. And yes, you should be sorry for posting this.

I'll buy your argument *IF* you can show that when he was born, his family was straight up liberal. Having their boys wear dresses if they chose and playing with dolls. Or i'll take a copy of the parents voter cards at the time of his birth that show they were card carrying libbys.

Till than, he was brought up a conservative. And it showed. You maggies like to so expouse that libbys can't throw, or do any physical activities. The boy pulled off the shot in one pull of the trigger. That really goes against how anti-gun libbies are.

He got that ability somewhere. One does not have to look beyond his rightwing conservative family to where that may have come.

...but if you have a picture of him at the gun range wearing a dress, i'll step back from that statement.

It should be sooooo easssyyyy for y'all to prove that. Game on!

[Ducbutter]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Aw. So rare to see maggies being lighthearted. You gotta admit that it would be like barbar to a Greek
But my posting history is noted here. What you call a list of grievances is what I do when I haven't logged in for a minute and catch up on the hijinx of this site and responds to those post I choose. So, that's boo on you.

And insult? Why don't you go through and document the heavy list of adjectives you maggies use. Maggie is my term of choice. But maggies are all about free speech...when it applies to them. If it comes from others, it better to fawn over how maggies can do no wrong else they shake the powers they think they have to do pettiness on the ill speakers.

But enlighten us with your free speech ability and tell all of us what vote and obsession that I have done. I *REALLY* want to hear this.

I guess you are saying you are a card carrying repub. Is that right? If so, you would be a hypocrite calling me partisan. I have stated in the past, and I will do it for your benefit now so as you don't have to search, that I vote for who *I* think is the best candidate at the time. Regardless of party affiliation.

Pretty partisan, eh?



I'll buy your argument *IF* you can show that when he was born, his family was straight up liberal. Having their boys wear dresses if they chose and playing with dolls. Or i'll take a copy of the parents voter cards at the time of his birth that show they were card carrying libbys.

Till than, he was brought up a conservative. And it showed. You maggies like to so expouse that libbys can't throw, or do any physical activities. The boy pulled off the shot in one pull of the trigger. That really goes against how anti-gun libbies are.

He got that ability somewhere. One does not have to look beyond his rightwing conservative family to where that may have come.

...but if you have a picture of him at the gun range wearing a dress, i'll step back from that statement.

It should be sooooo easssyyyy for y'all to prove that. Game on!

Good Lord, you are so far off the mark it's amusing. I am somewhat conservative by nature but am not affiliated with either US political party. A pox on both their houses as far as I'm concerned. And I've never liked Trump. But I owe you no explanation about my politics. I only mention it to show how wrong you are. Again.
And speaking of wrong, what makes you think that a kid growing up in an extremely conservative household wouldn't possibly have a reactionary response and become extremely liberal as some way to rebel?
Not to mention, my daughter is as liberal as they come and I started taking her to the range at 7. And that kid can shoot.

[Precious_b]

If you are gonna take a guess about someone, be ready spill the beans. Else don't get all butt hurt when called out on it.

So we both don't affiliate.

I'll be happy to answer *your* question when you tell us all about my obsession that you don't like or support. Because that would be supposition on your part.

[RX792P]

[tongue firmly in cheek/]

Would a libbie leftist drive a Dodge Challenger?

[RX792P]

[tongue firmly in cheek/]

Would a libbie leftist drive a Dodge Challenger?

[RX792P]

Seems a 2024 DOJ report on left/right political violence has been 'disappeared' by the Federal Government...though the wayback machine still has it.

“What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism,”


https://web.archive.org/web/20250911...nij/306123.pdf

“The number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism,” the opening paragraph of the study reads.

[eccieuser9500]

But they will still deny the evidence.

So all we can do is make fun of their dumbasses.

[Ducbutter]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

If you are gonna take a guess about someone, be ready spill the beans. Else don't get all butt hurt when called out on it.
I made no guess. In post # 187 I wrote "You should be." and in post # 188 you attempted to insult me. No one guessing except you.

So we both don't affiliate. Kumbaya

I'll be happy to answer *your* question when you tell us all about my obsession that you don't like or support. Because that would be supposition on your part.

I'm just not that interested in your answer. And no supposition, everyone here sees it constantly.

[Ducbutter]

Originally Posted by RX792P

[tongue firmly in cheek/]

Would a libbie leftist drive a Dodge Challenger?

Yes, but it'd be the V6 version!

[ICU 812]

As this thread's title says, Charlie Kirk was shot for his ideas.

As Rush Limbaugh did before him, Charlie Kirk showed that Democrats, and progressive liberals in general, cannot compete in the arena of ideas. Kirk refuted their agendas in every topic and exposed their mendacious intellectual dishonesty and moral bankruptcy publicly every time he sat under that awning. . . .and they killed him rather than talk with him.

So much for the often expressed desire to " . . .have a conversation about . . ." whatever.

[Jacuzzme]

100%. If Kirk wasn’t so effective at changing hearts and minds he’d be alive and well.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

100%. If Kirk wasn’t so effective at changing hearts and minds he’d be alive and well.

I can’t follow the logic of this statement. If he was so effective at changing hearts and minds then no one would have wanted to hurt him.

Let me fix that for you.

If Kirk wasn’t so effective at stoking hatred he’d be alive and well.

Tyler Robinson actually wrote.

When pressed about his motive, Robinson responded by saying, “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

I can’t follow the logic of this statement. If he was so effective at changing hearts and minds then no one would have wanted to hurt him.

Then you must be new to logic.

He was effective at leading large numbers of young people to Christ and to conservativism. Lefties can't have that.... you can see that by all their ICE protests filled with 60 year old whites from the local nursing hime.

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

When pressed about his motive, Robinson responded by saying, “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

The left has always claimed that words are violence so they can justify violence against those that speak out against their policies.

Apparently you think speaking divisive words justifies violence.

I think your words are violent...

Would everyone understand if I shot you in the throat?

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by texassapper

He was effective at leading large numbers of young people to Christ and to conservativism. Lefties can't have that.... you can see that by all their ICE protests filled with 60 year old whites from the local nursing hime.

The left has always claimed that words are violence so they can justify violence against those that speak out against their policies.

Apparently you think speaking divisive words justifies violence.

I think your words are violent...

Would everyone understand if I shot you in the throat?

I would freely admit that Charlie Kirk is a model for free speech. I would also say that his speech was divisive and offensive to many.

Christ and conservatism is hardly the model for inclusivity. Or at least the way the Republican party practices it is.

I never said this or suggested that violence is OK and I find it offensive that you think so.

”Apparently you think speaking divisive words justifies violence.”