Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 263
sharkman29 251
George Spelvin 248
Top Posters
DallasRain71442
biomed168896
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455281
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49699
WTF48272
pyramider46439
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid40667
CryptKicker37419
Mokoa36513
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg35836

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2025, 12:25 PM   #151
RX792P
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 798
Encounters: 116
Default

OK Fed cut interest by 25 basis points. Let's see what happens.
RX792P is online now   Quote
Old 09-17-2025, 04:28 PM   #152
Jacuzzme
Premium Access
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 9,603
Encounters: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
LOL. Yeah, nobody takes Trump literally and everyone knows he's inclined to exaggeration. I'm as familiar with the industry as you, and we both know the oilfield strongly prefers Trump, everyone from the rookie roustabout to empresarios like Harold Hamm. There are counties in West Texas that are majority Hispanic, and went for Trump by 50 or 60 points. People in the oil belt view the Democratic Party as an existential threat to their livelihood.
Inclined is probably an understatement. I find it hysterical.

Look at the grass on this golf course. There’s never been grass this beautiful . Everyone is talking about it. People come from all over the world to see this grass. The Virgin Mary could have another baby on this grass. Fake news cnn said there’s dandelions. There’s no dandelions, not one, ever. I should sue them outta existence.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 09-18-2025, 09:27 PM   #153
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,574
Encounters: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Not true. You probably got your numbers from a May, 2025 survey by the Dallas Fed. The survey asks “What price does your firm need to profitably drill new wells?” “Profitably” means with a rate of return. Furthermore drilling and completion costs continue to come down somewhat and technology continues improving. A friend told me he’s participating in a well with a 4 mile long horizontal lateral.

My friends who continue to participate in new wells aren’t dumb asses. Oil companies generally aren’t run by dumb asses. And they continue to drill. The rig count is 539, down 51 from last year, and some of that decline is because of longer laterals and improvements in frac technology. There’s been a trend for a long time towards fewer rigs, even as production has increased.

And there’s no such thing as a single break even price. Some wells are economic to drill at $20 a barrel and some aren’t at $150. When the price of oil goes down, fewer wells will be drilled in higher tier areas.

Finally the correct price of oil isn’t $85 per barrel. The price is a function of supply and demand. And OPEC plays around with supply in ways that move the price a lot.

The dumb asses aren’t in Houston and Midland. The dumb asses are in Washington D.C. and Sacramento. To circle back on topic, as Ducbutter said, deregulation by Trump helped the energy consumer and the oil and gas industry. Compare the national average electricity and gasoline price to an overregulated blue state like California.
I was referring to operational wells vs drilling for new oil. Operational wells cost is much lower, new drilling doesn't make financial sense at the current price point. Just saying that drill baby drill isn't happening at a scale that matters when the price of crude is in the low 60s.
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 09-18-2025, 10:15 PM   #154
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
Inclined is probably an understatement. I find it hysterical.

Look at the grass on this golf course. There’s never been grass this beautiful . Everyone is talking about it. People come from all over the world to see this grass. The Virgin Mary could have another baby on this grass. Fake news cnn said there’s dandelions. There’s no dandelions, not one, ever. I should sue them outta existence.
... The grass IS rather GREEN there, mate...
In fact, even GREENER than grass! ...

... And speaking of "green" $$$$ - Stock Markets were UP
yet-again today... ... ...

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 09-18-2025, 10:37 PM   #155
Precious_b
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Precious_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 15,752
Encounters: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
I’ve read AI plays a big part in electricity costs. Apparently the equipment is ridiculously power hungry and causes demand to skyrocket.
And that is justification enough to increase the electrical grid in this country, regardless what the current admin says.
Precious_b is online now   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 06:11 AM   #156
offshoredrilling
Valued Poster
 
offshoredrilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: near Lake Ontario
Posts: 49,699
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Precious_b View Post
And that is justification enough to increase the electrical grid in this country, regardless what the current admin says.
with nuke power plants please.

or n-gas n coal

wind and sun life span is to short
offshoredrilling is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 08:38 AM   #157
RX792P
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 798
Encounters: 116
Default

Shades of 2018....

Under the Trump administration, direct payments to farmers surged to over $61 billion, primarily through two ad-hoc programs established in response to the trade war with China and the coronavirus pandemic. A significant portion of this aid went to larger and wealthier farming operations.


Today 2025
Quote:
The Trump administration is drawing up plans to use tariff revenue to fund a program to support U.S. farmers, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins.

"There may be circumstances under which we will be very seriously looking to and announcing a package soon," Rollins told the newspaper in an interview on Wednesday.

Rollins said financing the bailout with “tariff income that is now coming into America” was “absolutely a potential.”
https://news.yahoo.com/news/finance/...041538385.html

Dang...will this affect my tariff rebate check?
What about paying down the deficit/debt?

Trump
Quote:
"We have a lot of money coming in. It's coming in tremendous numbers. There's a concept of making a dividend to the people of this country who have paid a lot of taxes and got nothing for it."

"There's a possibility. Primarily we want to pay down debt, but there's a possibility that we take a piece of it and make a dividend to the people."
RX792P is online now   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 09:23 AM   #158
RX792P
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 798
Encounters: 116
Default

Who qualifies for 'no tax on tips' and what counts as a tip?
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/quali...140315633.html

Proposed regulations
https://home.treasury.gov/system/fil...-8-27-2025.pdf
Quote:
Among the jobs exempted from tax on tips are sommeliers, cocktail waiters, pastry chefs, cake bakers, bingo workers, club dancers, DJs, clowns, podcasters, influencers, online video creators, ushers, maids, gardeners, electricians, house cleaners, tow truck drivers, wedding planners, personal care aides, tutors, au pairs, massage therapists, yoga instructors, skydiving pilots, ski instructors, parking garage attendants, delivery drivers and movers.

The tip must be voluntarily given, so mandatory tips or auto-gratuities would not qualify for the “no tax on tips” benefit. However, tip pools and similar arrangements qualify, so long as they are reported to the IRS and voluntary. The benefit is not available to married individuals who file their taxes separately.

The bad news for here
Quote:
The tip must be given in cash, check, debit card, gift card or any item exchangeable for a fixed amount of cash, unlike digital assets. And any amount received for illegal activity, prostitution services, or pornographic activity does not qualify as a tip, according to the Treasury Department.

The economy part
Quote:
Congressional budget analysts project the “No Tax on Tips” provision would increase the deficit by $40 billion through 2028. The nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimated in June that the tips deduction will cost $32 billion over 10 years.
RX792P is online now   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 09:27 AM   #159
RX792P
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 798
Encounters: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... The grass IS rather GREEN there, mate...
In fact, even GREENER than grass! ...

... And speaking of "green" $$$$ - Stock Markets were UP
yet-again today... ... ...

#### Salty
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-equ...133254645.html
Quote:
Investors withdrew massive capital out of U.S. equity funds in the week to Sept. 17 as they turned cautious about the market's lofty valuations following the recent rally through a policy rate cut by the Federal Reserve and rushed to lock in profits.

According to LSEG Lipper data, investors pulled out a net $43.19 billion from U.S. equity funds in the week, logging their largest weekly net sales since a $50.62 billion weekly outflow in mid-December 2024.

"The S&P 500 forward price-to-earnings ratio, at 22.6x, is in the 99th percentile over the past 20 years," said Mark Haefele, Chief Investment Officer at UBS Global Wealth Management.
RX792P is online now   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 10:37 AM   #160
royamcr
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 7, 2010
Location: OPKS
Posts: 7,574
Encounters: 39
Default

This is trump just buying votes with taxpayer money. Farmers are ok with getting fucked as long as they are being paid for it. Does that make farmers whores?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RX792P View Post
Shades of 2018....

Under the Trump administration, direct payments to farmers surged to over $61 billion, primarily through two ad-hoc programs established in response to the trade war with China and the coronavirus pandemic. A significant portion of this aid went to larger and wealthier farming operations.


Today 2025


https://news.yahoo.com/news/finance/...041538385.html

Dang...will this affect my tariff rebate check?
What about paying down the deficit/debt?

Trump
royamcr is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 11:43 AM   #161
RX792P
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 798
Encounters: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
This is trump just buying votes with taxpayer money. Farmers are ok with getting fucked as long as they are being paid for it. Does that make farmers whores?
No, but it shows that Trump and co. did not learn any lessons from the 'trade skirmish' of 2018-19...where they spend essentially all the tariff income keeping farmers in business after cratering the markets for their products.

Also illustrates the fallacy of the claimed plan of paying of debt with tariffs...since the administration is already looking at cleaving off tariff revenue to keep farmers from failing again.

And that ludicrous 'tariff rebate' idea....


The U.S. has collected $161.7 billion in CY2025 tariffs as of Sept. 15 2025. Less than one month of deficit, never mind debt.
RX792P is online now   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 12:44 PM   #162
RX792P
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 798
Encounters: 116
Default

https://www.jalopnik.com/1972649/aut...-tariff-costs/

Quote:
This year alone, General Motors says it is going to incur a $5 billion gross tariff bill, and Ford is right behind it at $3 billion, according to Reuters. That's a lot of money not going into the pockets of shareholders. For the time being, they've got some levers they can pull before foisting the cost onto customers, like asking suppliers or dealers to shoulder some of the load. I'm sure those discussions will go over well.

Automakers also have been subtly passing on some tariff costs to consumers without direct price increases, analysts and dealers said. For example, destination fees, which are essentially the delivery fees to the dealership, rose 8.5% for the 2025 model year, to $1,507, Edmunds found. This was a much more significant jump year-over-year than in the past decade.
RX792P is online now   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 04:56 PM   #163
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,581
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royamcr View Post
I was referring to operational wells vs drilling for new oil. Operational wells cost is much lower, new drilling doesn't make financial sense at the current price point. Just saying that drill baby drill isn't happening at a scale that matters when the price of crude is in the low 60s.

The bold text is dead wrong. The majority of new wells make financial sense or companies wouldn't drill them. Right now enough rigs are running to keep US production, which is at all time highs, stable. If prices remain in the low 60's, there will still be sufficient new production for a good while to replace most of the decline in old production. I'd wager the rig count won't fall over 20% from the current level for a good while if prices remain stable around the current level.

And Trump's Drill Baby Drill beats the Democrats' Fuck Oil Companies and Fuck Oil Industry Employees hands down. Compare blue California to red Texas. California once accounted for around 30% to 35% of USA oil production. As recently as 1986, California was 12%. Now it's nothing, even though there's a huge amount of potentially recoverable oil in place in the San Joaquin, Los Angeles and other California basins. California regulators have cut way back on the number of drilling permits they allow and have effectively banned fracking. The state intends to ban the upstream industry entirely by 2045. California production currently is 259,000 BO/year. That's nothing. There are single independent (non-major) oil companies that produce that much from Texas.

Take a look at the graphs and note the decline in California and the increase in Texas:

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/Le...s=MCRFPCA2&f=M

https://www.dallasfed.org/research/energy11/permian#oil

California production might not have ever taken off like it did in the Permian, increasing from around 1 million BOPD to over 6 million BOPD, but with the right regulatory climate I bet it would be over 1 million BOPD today.

The argument that production is going to decline a lot anyway because there aren't economic targets to go after in the USA, because the price is too low, is utter hogwash. Carter used an argument like that to create a nutty price control system for natural gas in his term. It turned out he was wrong. The USA wasn't about to run out of natural gas. Instead today it has the largest gas resource in the world.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 05:00 PM   #164
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,413
Default

... Too right, Tiny!

... President Trump is #1 for American Energy! ....

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 09-19-2025, 05:14 PM   #165
RX792P
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 798
Encounters: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... Too right, Tiny!

... President Trump is #1 for American Energy! ....

#### Salty
damn right he is...for oil, gas and coal industry.
Maybe not so much for renewables...or for you and me.

Quote:
The Trump administration has already added nearly $40 billion in new federal subsidies for oil, gas, and coal in 2025, a report released Tuesday finds, sending an additional $4 billion out the door each year for fossil fuels over the next decade. That new amount, created with the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act this summer, adds to $30.8 billion a year in preexisting subsidies for the fossil fuel industry. The report finds that the amount of public money the US will now spend on domestic fossil fuels stands at least $34.8 billion a year.
https://www.wired.com/story/us-taxpa...eautiful-bill/

Oh yeah...and in energy cost sharing...we private consumers get to share the cost of new electricity and transmission infrastructure with the data center owners, even though the new demand is strictly the data centers.


....still looking for that $1.99/gallon gas...
RX792P is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved