Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Is Tyler Robinson a Patsy and are We Being Fed a Lie?
Now that a little time has passed since the fateful day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated many videos and talking points are popping up on the internet posing the question if Tyler Robinson was a patsy. Is he?
There is a video as soon as you go to rense.com stating that a member of Kirk's own security detail wearing a brown shirt (wearing shades) might have assassinated him. I watched the video and the supposed assassins mannerisms do seem strange where they allude to that he may have used a palm gun of sorts. But you don't see a flash when the gun is supposedly fired.
To see the 24/7 Headline News stories on rense.com click down 9 or 10 times when you first go to that website FYI, the middle column.
Jeff Rense further goes on to list a link on rense.com leading to a Youtube video to refute what this Youtuber is saying, "New Shooter Conspiracy Theory Launched To Try To Cover The The Disastrous Failure Of The Tyler ‘Patsy' Robinson Storyline - Then There Are Those Who Swear Charlie Isn’t Dead At All"
In the Youtube video the guy explains that Kirk was shot from the back, well if Kirk was shot from the back then that would make Tyler Robinson a patsy then correct? Did the FBI recover the actual bullet? You can't be in two places at the same time.
Are we being lied to about what really happened to Charlie Kirk on that fateful day? If so, why?
A lot of self incriminating on -line evidence though and the "partner's" statements in person point to him.
The parents would have to be in on it too to set him up as a patsy. . . . .and they too seem genuine.
I think there is confusion about the gun as to what it actually was and is now.. A lot of Mausers were brought back from both WW-I and . WW-II . . . .and many more imported as surplus from countries around the world.
It cold well be that the gun is not on any record in the US. Many were re-chambered from the German ammo to 30-06 in the 1950s and 1960s, then put into a nicer stock and topped with a scope for deer hunting. Any deer hunter could have made that shot I think.
We will get the full story when this goes to trial. The authorities seem to be keeping him on a very strict watch to ensure that he doesn't become another Epstein or Oswald!
I watch a lot of vids on this and this case is really wacky and things don't add up.
First you have the suspect jumping off a roof with no rifle in possession. It isn't the type of rifle you can break down easily and even then too big to stuff into a back pack. Then how was a supposed rifle found in the woods near by? Was it planted?
Next is the supposed gunshot to the neck, a 30 06 would have a much bigger wound, some suggest a hit to the neck could almost decapitate a person if it hit the spine. Then there is no exit wound.
Other videos show evidence of getting hit in the back of head over the ear and the exit wound was what every one saw. This actually makes the most sense.
Videos show the "crime scene" being altered, stuff being shoved into pockets.... Kinda weird.
A few TP cameras were removed from the scene. Never saw any video from them, maybe FBI has it, but it doesn't fit the story of tyler being the roof shooter.
No autopsy.
The wife's previous involvement with the Trump org. Was she part of a Romanian trafficking thing?
The grifting at a memorial.
I think Tyler was involved, but not the shooter. Maybe a decoy or a fall guy as a cover up? He'll get convicted, probably a conspiracy charge.
A lot of self incriminating on -line evidence though and the "partner's" statements in person point to him.
The parents would have to be in on it too to set him up as a patsy. . . . .and they too seem genuine.
I think there is confusion about the gun as to what it actually was and is now.. A lot of Mausers were brought back from both WW-I and . WW-II . . . .and many more imported as surplus from countries around the world.
It cold well be that the gun is not on any record in the US. Many were re-chambered from the German ammo to 30-06 in the 1950s and 1960s, then put into a nicer stock and topped with a scope for deer hunting. Any deer hunter could have made that shot I think.
We will get the full story when this goes to trial. The authorities seem to be keeping him on a very strict watch to ensure that he doesn't become another Epstein or Oswald!
Even the Redacted Youtube channel and Candace Owens seem to be doubting the official narrative on Tyler Robinson like we are not getting all of the information. What's been presented has been very confusing and while all the evidence so far seems to point to Robinson acting alone there are a lot of things that don't make sense like the old man up front by the stage proclaiming that he did it when in fact he did not. He was a decoy. The guy wearing the brown shirt with the shades is strange and if that video could be played in different spectrums of light such as infrared or some other frequency/wavelength of light maybe it could show if he actually fired off some sort of palm gun showing the release of gases from his right hand while he used his left arm as a platform to stabilize a supposed kill shot if that's what Jeff Rense concludes. Was he using a type of Google Glass in which the palm gun had a laser on it that could only be seen by the wearer of such glasses? Because if a palm gun was used it wouldn't be wise to fire from the hip John Wayne style unless you could see a laser dot on Kirk's neck to ensure a kill shot could be delivered to the target intended.
The parents wouldn't have to be in on it to set up their son as a patsy the way I see it. The father recognized his son from the photographs. I don't believe we will get the full story when this goes to trial but what I do believe is that they want Robinson to go down for Kirk's death. If he truly did do it then he deserves the outcome of the verdict.
I believe Kirk's death was done to drive a deeper wedge between the Democrats and Republicans and also to divert attention from the war between NATO and BRICS which is ramping up and the bigger story that they do not want to talk about.
I watch a lot of vids on this and this case is really wacky and things don't add up.
First you have the suspect jumping off a roof with no rifle in possession. It isn't the type of rifle you can break down easily and even then too big to stuff into a back pack. Then how was a supposed rifle found in the woods near by? Was it planted?
Next is the supposed gunshot to the neck, a 30 06 would have a much bigger wound, some suggest a hit to the neck could almost decapitate a person if it hit the spine. Then there is no exit wound.
Other videos show evidence of getting hit in the back of head over the ear and the exit wound was what every one saw. This actually makes the most sense.
Videos show the "crime scene" being altered, stuff being shoved into pockets.... Kinda weird.
A few TP cameras were removed from the scene. Never saw any video from them, maybe FBI has it, but it doesn't fit the story of tyler being the roof shooter.
No autopsy.
The wife's previous involvement with the Trump org. Was she part of a Romanian trafficking thing?
The grifting at a memorial.
I think Tyler was involved, but not the shooter. Maybe a decoy or a fall guy as a cover up? He'll get convicted, probably a conspiracy charge.
How much was he paid to do that?
There's a whole lot of things that aren't adding up in the Tyler Robinson/Kirk assassination. Both links posted in the origianl post by Jeff Rense and the Youtuber he is trying to refute both point to Tyler Robinson being a patsy. Jeff Rense saying that Kirk was shot in the front row, and the Youtuber saying he was shot in the back. In both of their cases Robinson is a patsy according to their analysis.
Robinson was definitely involved and I can see why many are starting to have doubts. I don't think he was paid, he was just stupid enough to agree to do something so stupid where he could have been set up as the fall guy. My question is where is the bullet that was recovered from the crime scene so it can be matched with the weapons rifling?
Just like in Trumps first term when the Vegas massacre occurred the illegal Mexican security guard goes into hiding and then on the Ellen Degeneres show where she declares this is it, nothing more to see it's over. The shit just doesn't add up.
Surely this will come to light in a trial, but that could be a couple years away. Defense is going to argue that tyler couldn't be the shooter. He didn't have a gun on the roof. That would start the doubt from the jury. But they found fingerprints on roof, yes he was on the roof, but didn't shoot. Tyler walks or gets a lesser charge. Maybe investigators know this and are searching for another suspect but don't want to lead on that tyler isn't the main suspect.
I can't see Tyler Robinson getting off but he may end up meeting his maker in prison once he's in general population. I'm sure there's some white supremacist gang that might try to take him out if they liked Charlie Kirk. He's going to be a punk in prison because of what they know about his sexual life.
I watch a lot of vids on this and this case is really wacky and things don't add up.
First you have the suspect jumping off a roof with no rifle in possession. It isn't the type of rifle you can break down easily and even then too big to stuff into a back pack. Then how was a supposed rifle found in the woods near by? Was it planted?
This is the video I saw. Sure looks like the person in the video is carrying something big enough to be a long gun to me.
This is the video I saw. Sure looks like the person in the video is carrying something big enough to be a long gun to me.
If you didn't know what this video was pertaining too would you be able to determine with any degree of certainty that the person jumping off that roof was carrying a rifle? Secondly ask yourself "Who took the video".
If you didn't know what this video was pertaining too would you be able to determine with any degree of certainty that the person jumping off that roof was carrying a rifle? Secondly ask yourself "Who took the video".
dude .. it's security video from a nearby building. don't overthink it or you'll get a "conspiracy headache"
dude .. it's security video from a nearby building. don't overthink it or you'll get a "conspiracy headache"
That's what Conspiracy Theories are for to uncover the actual truth. What if you found out later that there wasn't any building with a security camera positioned in the general direction where Tyler was.
Is Tyler Robinson a Patsy and are We Being Fed a Lie?
