Encounter: MIXED MAMI

[Warrenajeffers]

There he goes again with the critiques but no fucking reviews!

[Scoot642]

[George1990]

Latham. Thanks for your review.

[Southgate18]

Originally Posted by George1990

If it’s so basic and the MOST important detail, I’d encourage you to work with the MODS to include a mandatory field: “Are pictures accurate.”

You’re almost exclusively an AMPS guy where the pictures are NEVER accurate so clearly you’re not influenced by that detail so I don’t even know why you’re so frustrated. You’re out here waving a sign ARE PICTURES ACCURATE, yet you only visit people with fake pictures?

Here’s a thought. “Hey OP, thanks for the review. Can you help a brother out. You said she’s a spinner, but the ad says she weighs 269 lbs. Do you think the pictures are accurate? She looks more like a smallish BBW? Appreciate you taking the time to respond.”

Hey George - you write a lot - but do you read?

I politely asked the OP a question. He answered. I thanked him.

My post was in response to your post not the OPs.

Here is the deal with the AMPs - I walk in and see the girl and if I don't like what I see - I leave. It's like evaluating the pictures only IRL.

What one guys finds to be fat - the next guy thinks is curvy.

In a world where we have pictures why not reference them?

Otherwise maybe we don't need pics at all - just rely on the descriptions of guys we don't know.

[Bogie12]

George's point is simple and not wrong and so is the OP's. This girl has one or two rather recent reviews. Both say she's a petite spinner type. Both say the info in the ad, and the pics, are wrong. There was discussion and follow up questions. According to all, for some strange reason, this girl's ad says she's 269 lbs, but she's not. It was established in these previous discussions that pics are not accurate. All reviews now say she is a petite spinner.

[Bogie12]

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=3060573

[Bogie12]

Originally Posted by Bogie12

George's point is simple and not wrong and so is the OP's. This girl has one or two rather recent reviews. Both say she's a petite spinner type. Both say the info in the ad, and the pics, are wrong. There was discussion and follow up questions. According to all, for some strange reason, this girl's ad says she's 269 lbs, but she's not. It was established in these previous discussions that pics are not accurate. All reviews now say she is a petite spinner.

Before everyone jumps all over me; not everything I said was accurate, I was going from memory. T518 says pics are accurate but that she's not a big girl. My general point, according to all three reviews, she is not 269 lbs, sounds more like 110 - 120.

[ignoramus]

Originally Posted by Bogie12

George's point is simple and not wrong and so is the OP's. This girl has one or two rather recent reviews. Both say she's a petite spinner type. Both say the info in the ad, and the pics, are wrong. There was discussion and follow up questions. According to all, for some strange reason, this girl's ad says she's 269 lbs, but she's not. It was established in these previous discussions that pics are not accurate. All reviews now say she is a petite spinner.

Fair enough.

I knew that number was obviously wrong, but why the hell would she post images of a much larger woman, especially when every other provider is doing the old bait-and-switch or posting old images because they are much heavier? It makes no sense.

Also, many users here don't understand what "petite" means. Amber (the latina) is NOT petite. Nor is Storme. I understand there's some room for interpretation, but come on...

My questions and skepticism were legitimate. People need to stop taking everything so personally.

[t518]

Originally Posted by Bogie12

Before everyone jumps all over me; not everything I said was accurate, I was going from memory. T518 says pics are accurate but that she's not a big girl. My general point, according to all three reviews, she is not 269 lbs, sounds more like 110 - 120.