Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 324
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 307
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71471
biomed169360
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455441
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49835
WTF48272
pyramider46448
bambino45364
The_Waco_Kid40985
CryptKicker37431
Mokoa36516
Dr-epg36305
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-08-2025, 08:16 AM   #16
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,688
Encounters: 41
Default

No. They were attempting to stop congress from doing their job of governing. That’s the insurrection.

They fought police and other things. Those are crimes but are not in and of themselves insurrection. Everyone that fights a cop or resists arrest isn’t committing an act of insurrection.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 08:34 AM   #17
lustylad
Lifetime Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,585
Encounters: 10
Default

Was Alabama Gov. George Wallace an insurrectionist when he resisted the National Guard and blocked the door at the U. of Alabama in 1963?

How is that any different from Gov. Jay Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson resisting lawful efforts by ICE to arrest criminal illegals in Chicago today?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:11 AM   #18
Why_Yes_I_Do
Valued Poster
 
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2013
Location: Railroad Tracks, other side thereof
Posts: 8,288
Encounters: 14
Default Must missed a step or two

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
No. They were attempting to stop congress from doing their job of governing. That’s the insurrection...
I thought theirs was a Constitutional right, as in the underlined below:
Quote:
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Maybe those words mean; but only if you are an approved Democrat citizen perhaps??
Why_Yes_I_Do is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:24 AM   #19
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,688
Encounters: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Was Alabama Gov. George Wallace an insurrectionist when he resisted the National Guard and blocked the door at the U. of Alabama in 1963?

How is that any different from Gov. Jay Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson resisting lawful efforts by ICE to arrest criminal illegals in Chicago today?
It’s not an insurrection. I don’t agree with Wallace and his actions were wrong. But the national government can use the military to enforce federal law when the state fails to do so. Which is exactly what they did. I suspect you’d. agree that Wallace wasn’t committing an insurrection but he was impeding the enforcement of the federal law and the rights of his black citizens.

Is that the same as not aiding the federal law enforcement from
Performing their duties. As I understand it Chicago is not helping ICE. They are not impeding ICE. Protestors are not the state and the 1st Amendment says they can protest. The governor and mayor have every right to resist the guard deployment for an insurrection as there is none. As for whether the federal govt can deploy the military to protect a federal building claiming crime is beyond the ability of the police and federal officers, I suspect those grounds don’t really exist.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:25 AM   #20
ICU 812
Valued Poster
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,824
Encounters: 15
Default

I grew ump in the turmoil of the 1960s.

I was taught that the red line between legal protest and activism and insurrection was advocating for or actually committing violence against the government.

The ultimate act of insurrection of course is the removal of an elected official through assignation.

When a local, egioal or state official, be they mayor or governor orders subordinates to resist the lawful actions of federal law enforcement officers, that too is insurrection.

The Civil War began with local force3s began shooting at the Federal installation at Fort Sumter upon the election of President Lincoln. That was insurrection. This is only different in scale from assaulting a federal installation in Chicago or Portland or . . . .assaulting ICE officers by ramming with a car.
ICU 812 is online now   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:28 AM   #21
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,688
Encounters: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do View Post
I thought theirs was a Constitutional right, as in the underlined below:Maybe those words mean; but only if you are an approved Democrat citizen perhaps??
Breaking into the Capitol and fighting the police and breaking windows to gain entry doesn’t strike me as very peaceful. I suppose the republicans definition of peaceful only applies tviolence when it’s righties that do it. But I won’t go back and forth with you. We all watched live as righties fought police, waged nazi flags, broke windows, scaled the sides of the capitol and entered the building to stop the congress feom certifying the election. If you missed it, it’s available on the internet. They even played it live on Fox.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:30 AM   #22
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,688
Encounters: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812 View Post
I grew ump in the turmoil of the 1960s.

I was taught that the red line between legal protest and activism and insurrection was advocating for or actually committing violence against the government.

The ultimate act of insurrection of course is the removal of an elected official through assignation.

When a local, egioal or state official, be they mayor or governor orders subordinates to resist the lawful actions of federal law enforcement officers, that too is insurrection.
So you agree that the J6 individuals were insurrectionists, by your statements. And that Trump was one as well.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:38 AM   #23
ICU 812
Valued Poster
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,824
Encounters: 15
Default

In he OP (post #1) I indicated that the events of Jan 6th, 2020 had been exhaustively explored on this forum in the past.

The topic of this thread is recent acts of opposition and violence that constitute insurrection.

Discussion of Jan 6th in this thread is a topic hijack.
ICU 812 is online now   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 11:58 AM   #24
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,710
Encounters: 2
Default

Blackman's upped his game! Probably because LL's back. Good thread gentlemen.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 12:55 PM   #25
lustylad
Lifetime Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,585
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Blackman's upped his game! Probably because LL's back. Good thread gentlemen.
Yes, he has! I like the way you schmooze both of us by crediting me for it too lol.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 01:01 PM   #26
txdot-guy
Lifetime Premium Access
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 4,959
Default

As far as I know there is no one ordering local police or other public services to actively impede the legitimate activities of the federal authorities.

That being said as far as I am aware the local authorities are not required to support or provide assistance to federal authorities in any way shape or form.

And local authorities are actually required to investigate arrest and prosecute anyone acting unlawfully in their jurisdiction. Including federal authorities who break the law.

This is the very dichotomy that we live under when the federal and state authorities don’t work together.

When it comes right down to it the federal government requires the cooperation of the state and local governments.

How they get that cooperation and the quality of that cooperation is dependent upon how the federal government goes about it.

Donald Trump’s use of military force under the flimsiest of circumstances and the labeling of regions as crime ridden, a hellhole, a warzone set the tone of the cooperation he gets.

Donald Trump is setting the stage for any confrontation that comes and is ultimately responsible for the chaos that could occur.

Which comes first tyranny or insurrection?
txdot-guy is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 02:56 PM   #27
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,688
Encounters: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812 View Post
In he OP (post #1) I indicated that the events of Jan 6th, 2020 had been exhaustively explored on this forum in the past.

The topic of this thread is recent acts of opposition and violence that constitute insurrection.

Discussion of Jan 6th in this thread is a topic hijack.
Pretty rich coming from the dude that starts repetitive threads every couple of weeks stating pretty much the same exact thing over and over. That’s what I call exhaustive.

Nonetheless, here we’re comparing to events which are not far apart in time to determine what a real and actual insurrection is. That’s absolutely on topic. Now just because you don’t want to engage in an actual debate and just want to post some same silliness over and over, that’s on you.

Here ya go in simple terms.

President ginning up a crowd to march to the capitol to stop congress from acting to essentially end his term and make someone else president - definitely as close to insurrection as one can get.

Rioters attacking the capitol to try and stop congress from transferring the presidency from one person to another that was elected - absolutely an insurrection

Rioters attacking police and breaking into the capitol - a crime, not in and of itself an insurrection. Here’s the difference. Let’s assume it’s simply Saturday and they want to go in and kill AOC because they don’t like her. Not and insurrection. Same act, different purpose. Still a crime.

Rioters attacking ICE because they think they are the modern Gestapo - a crime. Not and insurrection.

Governor denying the national guard to aid ICE - not an insurrection.

Governor calling off his troopers and the mayor calling off the city police or sheriffs to aid ICE - not an insurrection

The only remaining question is whether the president can call in the guard specifically to aid ICE if ICE cannot carry out their duty to apply federal law. I’d say it depends on the necessity of having additional aid. That’s what’s at question.

Nevertheless, there’s no insurrection. There was one in Jan 2020 but not now.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:54 PM   #28
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,710
Encounters: 2
Default

Accidental post
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 10-08-2025, 09:56 PM   #29
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,710
Encounters: 2
Default What the hell's an insurrection? Are there good insurrections and bad insurrections? What if a person is crazy or misled by others? Should he still go to jail for participating in an insurrection?

OK Blackman, I’m going to do you a favor and save you from the wrath of ICU. Here’s your own thread to opine on erections.

Despite the spelling mistakes and missing January 6 by a year, you provided an excellent thread starter:

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Pretty rich coming from the dude that starts repetitive threads every couple of weeks stating pretty much the same exact thing over and over. That’s what I call exhaustive.

Nonetheless, here we’re comparing to events which are not far apart in time to determine what a real and actual insurrection is. That’s absolutely on topic. Now just because you don’t want to engage in an actual debate and just want to post some same silliness over and over, that’s on you.

Here ya go in simple terms.

President ginning up a crowd to march to the capitol to stop congress from acting to essentially end his term and make someone else president - definitely as close to insurrection as one can get.

Rioters attacking the capitol to try and stop congress from transferring the presidency from one person to another that was elected - absolutely an insurrection

Rioters attacking police and breaking into the capitol - a crime, not in and of itself an insurrection. Here’s the difference. Let’s assume it’s simply Saturday and they want to go in and kill AOC because they don’t like her. Not and insurrection. Same act, different purpose. Still a crime.

Rioters attacking ICE because they think they are the modern Gestapo - a crime. Not and insurrection.

Governor denying the national guard to aid ICE - not an insurrection.

Governor calling off his troopers and the mayor calling off the city police or sheriffs to aid ICE - not an insurrection

The only remaining question is whether the president can call in the guard specifically to aid ICE if ICE cannot carry out their duty to apply federal law. I’d say it depends on the necessity of having additional aid. That’s what’s at question.

Nevertheless, there’s no insurrection. There was one in Jan 2020 but not now.
Did Trump actually believe he won the 2020 election? That he got millions more votes than Biden? If the answer is yes, does that let him off the hook? If someone’s nutty, you send him to the nuthouse, not to prison, right? And if you're going to say Trump's nutty, then are Stacy Abrams and Hillary Clinton nutty too? They think they won in 2016 and 2018.

Or what if he realized he didn’t get the votes, but truly believed there was a Constitutional basis for him to claim the presidency anyway through appointments of alternate electors and votes of state legislatures? Wasn’t that what brilliant legal minds like Rudy Giuilani and John Eastman told him? Well, wouldn’t that let him off the hook?

Or what about the argument that the ends justify the means? Did he believe the USA would go down the tubes after Biden took over? When Augusto Pinochet overthrew Salvador Allende, killed a few thousand of his political opponents and brought economic sanity to Chile, was he doing his country a favor? Well, Trump didn’t have any intention of killing anyone. So maybe he attempted an insurrection, but his intentions were noble?

And how about the crowd that entered the Capitol. Were they misled? I believe the majority thought the election was stolen from Trump. Does that get them off the hook, the nonviolent ones? That is, their belief they were saving American democracy?

Are there good insurrections and bad insurrections? And who decides whether they’re good or bad? We’d mostly agree the uprising of the American colonies against England was good. The Brits didn’t.

Is there the possibility that the current conflagration involving Trump, governors, mayors, protestors and ICE could lead to an insurrection? A Civil War?

The Democratic Party is of the lawyers, by the lawyers and for the lawyers. It knows how to manipulate the system better than Republicans. Are the Democrats pursuing insurrection behind the scenes, while the Republicans under Trump do it in peoples’ faces?

My personal opinion is that all this is way overblown. Democratic institutions in the USA are strong. They’ll withstand anything Trump, Antifa or the political parties throw at them. And politically, Americans aren’t a violent people. Compare to India, a vibrant democracy, where hundreds have died from political violence in some election years.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 10-09-2025, 04:36 AM   #30
ICU 812
Valued Poster
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,824
Encounters: 15
Default

The topic of this thread is OT Jan 6th.

The topic of this thread is the recent anti-ICE activity and whether or not that is political protest or insurrection against the federal government.

My contention is that acts such as impeding law enforcement in their efforts to apprehend suspected wrong doers is. Furthethermore, I contend that local, regional and State officials who impede the effective operations of Federal law enforcement agents through executive actions are also participating in if not leading an insurrection against the national government.
ICU 812 is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved