Trump closed the airspace over and surrounding Venezuela!

[jayzee43]

So, "no new wars" eh? Not only has trump not stopped any existing wars, he's planning on starting a new one.

Great job, MAGA. You got played yet again.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by jayzee43

So, "no new wars" eh? Not only has trump not stopped any existing wars, he's planning on starting a new one.

Great job, MAGA. You got played yet again.

The “War” on D***** started 50 years ago. Try to keep up. But Trumps intervention in Venezuela is about much more;

MASSIVE: Venezuelan Military Intelligence whistleblower just confirmed the CIA outsources election rigging technology like Smartmatic from Venezuela.

This is the main reason warships are surrounding Venezuela right now, aside from narco trafficking. It’s not about oil or Israel.

“My name is Hugo Carvajal Barrios. For many years, I was a high ranking member of the Venezuelan regime. I was a three-star general trusted by both Hugo Chavez and Nicolás Maduro and served as Director of Military Intelligence and a Deputy in the National Assembly. Today, I sit in an American prison because I voluntarily plead guity to the crimes charged against me: a narco-terrorism conspiracy.

…Smartmatic was born as an electoral tool of the Venezuelan regime…I know this because I placed the head of IT of the National Electoral Council (CNE) in his position, and he reported directly to me. The Smartmatic system can be altered-this is a fact. This technology was later exported abroad, including to the United States. Regime operatives maintain relationships with election officials and voting-machine companies inside your country.

…I absolutely support President Trump's policy towards Venezuela, because it is in self-defense and he is acting based on the truth.”

Hugo Carvajal Barrios

This confirms everything Sydney Powell was blowing the whistle on in 2020, and since then Patrick Byrne, General Flynn, and Emerald Robinson who broke the story recently.

The military posturing around Venezuela is not just about the outsourced and weaponized n****-trafficking by the global mafia — it’s about how they rig elections.

[bambino]

OPEN BORDER: Former Venezuelan intel chief says Maduro exported gangs into the US during Biden’s border collapse, and has run two decades of espionage against America.

In a stunning letter obtained by The Dallas Express, Hugo Carvajal, once Maduro’s top intelligence chief and a key figure in the Cartel de los Soles, tells President Trump that Venezuela has weaponized c******, exported criminal gangs like Tren de Aragua into the U.S., and allowed FARC, ELN, Hezbollah and Cuban intelligence to operate freely. He alleges decades of espionage inside U.S. installations, Russian tapping proposals, and Smartmatic election manipulation tools exported abroad. Carvajal says the Biden–Harris border collapse allowed Venezuelan operatives to enter the U.S. and asserts Trump’s hard-line policies were not only correct, but necessary for American national security.

[jayzee43]

nO NeW wArS ...

MAGA will believe anything that this ailing limp dick tells them. Worst. Cult Leader. Ever.

[bambino]

I didn't see this one coming!! ���� BREAKING: Kentucky Senator Rand Paul is one of the top politicians on the VENEZUELA LIST that has been taking MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN KICKBACKS from the Maduro regime and n************ in the Latin American country, according to a HIGH-RANKING VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT SOURCE. He has been AIDING AND ABETTING these violent criminals in their trafficking of deadly d**** in to The United States that are killing approximately 120,000 Americans every year.

[bambino]

A boat in international waters that is not running a national flag is categorized in international law the same way a pirate is. Such boats have absolutely no national or international protections, and you cannot commit a war crime against them.
A vessel in international waters is required under UNCLOS to sail under the flag of a specific nation. If it does not, it is legally considered a stateless vessel. A stateless vessel has no right to the protections normally afforded to ships under a national flag, including immunity from interference by other states.
UNCLOS Articles 92, 94, 110, and customary maritime law spell out the consequences clearly:
1. Stateless vessels have no sovereign protection. A flagged ship is an extension of its flag-state’s sovereignty. A stateless vessel is not. This matters because “war crimes” presuppose protected persons or protected property. A stateless vessel is legally unprotected.
2. Any state may stop, board, search, seize, or disable, a stateless vessel. UNCLOS Article 110 explicitly authorizes boarding and seizure. The law does not require states to risk their own personnel or assets while doing so. Disabling a vessel that refuses inspection, including firing on it, is legally permitted under both UNCLOS and long-established state practice.
3. War crimes require an armed conflict. You cannot commit a “war crime” outside an armed conflict. War crimes occur only within the context of international humanitarian law (IHL). Enforcing maritime law against a stateless vessel is a law enforcement action, not an IHL situation.
No armed conflict = no war crime possible.
4. Lethal force may be used when a vessel refuses lawful orders. The International Maritime Organization’s “Use of Force” guidance for maritime interdiction recognizes that disabling fire, even lethal force, is lawful when a vessel refuses lawful boarding, attempts to flee, poses a threat, or engages in illicit activities such as piracy or narcotics trafficking.
Once again: law enforcement rules apply, not IHL.
5. Sinking a stateless vessel is not prohibited by UNCLOS. UNCLOS permits seizure of a stateless vessel and leaves the means entirely to the enforcing state so long as necessity and proportionality are respected. If the vessel flees, attacks, or refuses lawful commands, sinking it is legally permissible. Many states routinely do this to drug-smuggling vessels (e.g., semi-submersibles) without it ever being treated as a war crime.
6. No flag = no jurisdictional shield. The entire reason international law requires ships to fly a flag is to prevent this exact situation. Flagless vessels are legally vulnerable by design.
Because a stateless vessel has no protected status, because UNCLOS authorizes interdiction of such vessels, because lethal force may be used in maritime law enforcement when necessary, and because war crimes require an armed conflict that is not present here, sinking an unflagged ship in international waters is not a war crime.

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by bambino

I didn't see this one coming!! ���� BREAKING: Kentucky Senator Rand Paul is one of the top politicians on the VENEZUELA LIST that has been taking MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN KICKBACKS from the Maduro regime and n************ in the Latin American country, according to a HIGH-RANKING VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT SOURCE. He has been AIDING AND ABETTING these violent criminals in their trafficking of deadly d**** in to The United States that are killing approximately 120,000 Americans every year.

I rarely will defend a GOPer, but clean hands Rand, is likely NOT the guy being portrayed in the "BREAKING NEWS". Rand is just being punished for saying two things.

Lets see the epstein list for the epsteinth time
Those boat shootings look like they are illegal.


The last time Rand actually got out of line- his neighbor punch the fucking shit out of him and broke some of his ribs. Plus- if he was on the take- don't you think he could get someone to fix that fucking bad toupe' or whatever the fuck has taken refuge on top of his lid??? He's actually one of the less ignorant fucks from Tennessee. Topples O' McConnell is a total scumbag- and yet still suckles on the govt tit. I hate most of the synchophants that are the lemmings in the Senate> THEY HAVE NO BALLS AT ALL> at least the house has people who stand up for shit.

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by bambino

A boat in international waters that is not running a national flag is categorized in international law the same way a pirate is. Such boats have absolutely no national or international protections, and you cannot commit a war crime against them.
A vessel in international waters is required under UNCLOS to sail under the flag of a specific nation. If it does not, it is legally considered a stateless vessel. A stateless vessel has no right to the protections normally afforded to ships under a national flag, including immunity from interference by other states.
UNCLOS Articles 92, 94, 110, and customary maritime law spell out the consequences clearly:
1. Stateless vessels have no sovereign protection. A flagged ship is an extension of its flag-state’s sovereignty. A stateless vessel is not. This matters because “war crimes” presuppose protected persons or protected property. A stateless vessel is legally unprotected.
2. Any state may stop, board, search, seize, or disable, a stateless vessel. UNCLOS Article 110 explicitly authorizes boarding and seizure. The law does not require states to risk their own personnel or assets while doing so. Disabling a vessel that refuses inspection, including firing on it, is legally permitted under both UNCLOS and long-established state practice.
3. War crimes require an armed conflict. You cannot commit a “war crime” outside an armed conflict. War crimes occur only within the context of international humanitarian law (IHL). Enforcing maritime law against a stateless vessel is a law enforcement action, not an IHL situation.
No armed conflict = no war crime possible.
4. Lethal force may be used when a vessel refuses lawful orders. The International Maritime Organization’s “Use of Force” guidance for maritime interdiction recognizes that disabling fire, even lethal force, is lawful when a vessel refuses lawful boarding, attempts to flee, poses a threat, or engages in illicit activities such as piracy or narcotics trafficking.
Once again: law enforcement rules apply, not IHL.
5. Sinking a stateless vessel is not prohibited by UNCLOS. UNCLOS permits seizure of a stateless vessel and leaves the means entirely to the enforcing state so long as necessity and proportionality are respected. If the vessel flees, attacks, or refuses lawful commands, sinking it is legally permissible. Many states routinely do this to drug-smuggling vessels (e.g., semi-submersibles) without it ever being treated as a war crime.
6. No flag = no jurisdictional shield. The entire reason international law requires ships to fly a flag is to prevent this exact situation. Flagless vessels are legally vulnerable by design.
Because a stateless vessel has no protected status, because UNCLOS authorizes interdiction of such vessels, because lethal force may be used in maritime law enforcement when necessary, and because war crimes require an armed conflict that is not present here, sinking an unflagged ship in international waters is not a war crime.

So a daytrip from Miami to the Bahamas requires a USA flag or atleast the Jolly Roger?


heres some good information:

Here's a breakdown of maritime zones:

Territorial Sea (0-12 nautical miles): Full sovereignty for the coastal state, like land.

Contiguous Zone (12-24 nautical miles): Limited enforcement for customs, immigration, etc..

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) (12-200 nautical miles): Sovereign rights over marine resources (fishing, oil) but not full sovereignty over the water.

High Seas (Beyond 200 nautical miles): Open to all nations, with freedom of navigation and use.


So, "international waters" generally means "beyond 200 nautical miles" from the baseline, but the specific boundaries can involve the continental shelf for seabed resources.


FYI- most of the shootings on these boats were much less than 200 miles off shore. The boats sunk by the U.S. military as part of its operations against alleged "narco-terrorist" networks were not consistently sunk over 200 miles from shore.

The locations varied, with some strikes occurring relatively close to the Venezuelan or other Caribbean coasts, and others taking place much further out in the Eastern Pacific.
Key locations and distances include:

Near Venezuela/Trinidad and Tobago: The first publicized strike on September 2, 2025, occurred in international waters just off the coast of Venezuela, about 65 miles from Trinidad's northern coast.

Other strikes in the Caribbean near Venezuela were also in international waters in that general area.
Near Dominican Republic: One interdiction was about 80 nautical miles (approximately 92 miles or 148 km) south of the Dominican-controlled Beata Island.

Essentially Adolf Trump and his Einsatzgruppen hit teams are killing people NOT in INTERNATIONAL WATERS like he's lying about but in much more close-and areas where this whole gotta fly a flag bullshit isn't relevant.

[bambino]

BREAKING: President Trump says Venezuelan President Maduro’s “days are numbered” and warns the U.S. could soon take action on the ground.

@GeneralMCNews

[jayzee43]

BuT nO NeW wArS, remember?

Someone should tell donnie dickhead this isn't how you win a Nobel Peace Prize.

Only a fake soccer peace prize.

[lustylad]

BAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eyecu2

So a daytrip from Miami to the Bahamas requires a USA flag or atleast the Jolly Roger?


heres some good information:

Here's a breakdown of maritime zones:

Territorial Sea (0-12 nautical miles): Full sovereignty for the coastal state, like land.

Contiguous Zone (12-24 nautical miles): Limited enforcement for customs, immigration, etc..

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) (12-200 nautical miles): Sovereign rights over marine resources (fishing, oil) but not full sovereignty over the water.

High Seas (Beyond 200 nautical miles): Open to all nations, with freedom of navigation and use.


So, "international waters" generally means "beyond 200 nautical miles" from the baseline, but the specific boundaries can involve the continental shelf for seabed resources.


FYI- most of the shootings on these boats were much less than 200 miles off shore. The boats sunk by the U.S. military as part of its operations against alleged "narco-terrorist" networks were not consistently sunk over 200 miles from shore.

The locations varied, with some strikes occurring relatively close to the Venezuelan or other Caribbean coasts, and others taking place much further out in the Eastern Pacific.
Key locations and distances include:

Near Venezuela/Trinidad and Tobago: The first publicized strike on September 2, 2025, occurred in international waters just off the coast of Venezuela, about 65 miles from Trinidad's northern coast.

Other strikes in the Caribbean near Venezuela were also in international waters in that general area.
Near Dominican Republic: One interdiction was about 80 nautical miles (approximately 92 miles or 148 km) south of the Dominican-controlled Beata Island.

Essentially Adolf Trump and his Einsatzgruppen hit teams are killing people NOT in INTERNATIONAL WATERS like he's lying about but in much more close-and areas where this whole gotta fly a flag bullshit isn't relevant.

let me just ask you and anyone else one question ..


do you really think these people were just getting an early start on deep sea fishing??


bahahaha

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

let me just ask you and anyone else one question ..


do you really think these people were just getting an early start on deep sea fishing??


bahahaha

No. I bet they 100% were running illegal something. But when our military murders ppl who are miles out to sea, and lies about it, that's wrong. Bring back the bodies, the (referenced unmentionable topic) or evidence beyond the assumption of wrong doing. Being on a hooker board borders on some wrong doings but nobody should be blasted to pieces for it.

None of those boats have enough fuel to get to our border. They might transport to other places but thats it. If there was a real need to impact the imports mentioned, it would be from mexico. Start there, not Venezuela.

Also the military lied about them being in international waters at least several dozen times. That's literally murder by a government.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eyecu2

No. I bet they 100% were running illegal something. But when our military murders ppl who are miles out to sea, and lies about it, that's wrong. Bring back the bodies, the (referenced unmentionable topic) or evidence beyond the assumption of wrong doing. Being on a hooker board borders on some wrong doings but nobody should be blasted to pieces for it.

None of those boats have enough fuel to get to our border. They might transport to other places but thats it. If there was a real need to impact the imports mentioned, it would be from mexico. Start there, not Venezuela.

Also the military lied about them being in international waters at least several dozen times. That's literally murder by a government.

complete nonsense. who did we "murder" exactly? criminals yes? how do you know the fuel they had? you don't you are just trying to throw shade at Trump. if Obama did this you would cheer it! oh snick! Obama did do it!



post links to prove your claims otherwise your claims have no merit

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

complete nonsense. who did we "murder" exactly? criminals yes? how do you know the fuel they had? you don't you are just trying to throw shade at Trump. if Obama did this you would cheer it! oh snick! Obama did do it!



post links to prove your claims otherwise your claims have no merit

So rich coming from a synchophant follower of dear leader. I don't have to prove the fuel amount- but you can guess approx by the amount of barrels seen. So, it's either gas or contraband on board. But- High speed boats drink fuel like crazy- in order to travel 1400 miles to get to the closest point in the USA- they would need about 1000 gallons. There would need to be 18 / 55 gal barrels of gasoline to go that far. They didn't have that in gas, and contraband in total. MATH dude....The math aint mathing. That's equal to the amount a gasoline or oil tanker carries btw. FYI.

THe video speaks for itself. The military fired on the boat, destroying it, and while it's 35 or more feet longer- the accusation was that the 2 blown to fuck survivors were somehow gathing up the contraband- and attempting to flip it over.

ANYONE who has been in a canoe, let a lone a 35 foot boat knows that it would take well more than 2 ppl to upright a 35 foot boat. It likely would take well more than 200 ppl who are standing on the sea floor to do that when you add on the weight of the engines, fuel and cargo. Like trying to flip over a boat that weighs 4000 pounds in hull and 2 engines- and 6000 lbs of gas, and however much contraband- maybe another 1-2000 lbs. so to assume that 2 ppl were gonna flip over a boat that was well over 10,000 lbs in weight , in deep sea, is impossible. So---to summarize the conclusion- There are two blown to fuck ppl, unknown exact amount of fuel, unknown contraband, unknown destination and less than 200 miles off shore, who were a threat to the US and were about to flip that hulk over..???

So- we fired another salvo into them to protect ourselves from the near Atari capacity of these two guys similar in strength to Donkey-Kong.

The second strike was to avoid these two HE-Men who were able to upright a boat and it's contents. You would have to be a complete idiot to believe the story being presented to the public and press. The old adage of why tell the truth when a lie will do is likely a better response.

I don't need to throw shade at anyone- as the Trump administration does it daily and consistently. They step in shit and walk across the living room, and every other room in the golden guilded shithole oval / WH. I don't cheer for the murder of anyone - let alone ppl I don't know- but MAGA sure does. They love to see any kind of red meat. - almost laughing at times- He died like a dog.


People who wear that tight fitting REDHAT are delusionally incapable of telling what is a lie and what is the truth.

......AND have a special TDS- TRUMP DENIAL SYNDROME.

It's ok to kill anyone,- shoot a guy on 5th avenue- it's ok.
lie on any and all banking info- it's fine.
it's ok to destroy the Whitehouse for a bordello dance hall and hootin-jug event center.

It's ok to violate the constitution and emoluments clauses- they are for suckers.

Why??-

well we don't need laws or congress or the scotus to limit dear leader- cause when we have a tantrum throwing , ketchup wielding toddler who won't tell the truth - about murders, his health or who he's going to pardon- that's perfectly fine with us.


Essentially- you support a fucking idiot, and an inept secretary of defense- who is a dried up alchey. I am not at all surprised you believe any of what he's said, and that you think he's doing a great job.- matter of fact, after reading ANY of your posts- I would be shocked if you didn't have one of the most extreme cases of denial out there.