Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
The Democratic Socialists running New York City now believe all your things belong to them, including your house. Just the other day, New York City councilwoman Vickie Paladino warned that Zohran Mamdani's line in his inaugural address about landlords being "good stewards," lest the city seize their property, was a signal for socialist activists to start filing complaints on behalf of the city's renters so the seizures can begin.
She's not wrong.
Mamdani's housing and tenant advocate, Cea Weaver, says private property is a tool of "white supremacy" and she's going to push for the confiscation of private property.
Cea Weaver, Mamdani’s new director of the city Office to Protect Tenants, made the statements and urged her followers to elect more Communists in several lecturing posts on her now-deleted X account that were unearthed by internet sleuths.
“Seize private property!” she said on June 13, 2018.
She later doubled down on that in a mini-manifesto in August 2019.
“Private property including any kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership is a weapon of white supremacy,” she said then.
Weaver also pushed to “Elect more communists” in December 2017 — when a Harlem street corner was being renamed in honor of former Manhattan Rep. Vito Marcantonio, who was a Communist.
She also unloaded on law enforcement in a May 2020 rant that came during the furor over the death of George Floyd.
You'll be unsurprised to learn Weaver is especially eager to strip white people of their property.
oh look .. here's white socialist cunt wanting to take white people's property .... for her own no doubt!
I think the reality is that, for centuries, we've really treated property as an individualized good and not a collective good, and transitioning to treating it as a collective good and towards a model of shared equity will require that we think about it differently," Weaver said in an undated video. "And it will mean that families, especially white families, but some POC families who are homeowners as well are going to have a different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
That must be the "warmth of collectivism" Mamdani was referring to in his inaugural address.
There is no other way to describe this than evil.
"This is evil, and it has led to evil — and mass murder and starvation into the tens of millions —which is why she obfuscates it in all these euphemisms," wrote Amy Alkon on X.
This is evil, and it has led to evil—and mass murder and starvation into the tens of millions—which is why she obfuscates it in all these euphemisms.
"When she says families will have a a different relationship with their property she means the government will commandeer their homes for the collective," wrote Politibunny.
Yes. That's exactly what will happen. It'll start with multi-family homes, and then it'll move to single-family homes until your race and political status determine whether or not you get to keep the property you bought and paid for. And while it's easy to dismiss this as something New York voters will have to deal with, the socialists have made it clear that Mamdani is the trial balloon. They're running candidates in local and Senate races across the country.
It will come to your state and neighborhood soon.
oh look! here's that socialist cunt Cea Weaver's new house .. confiscated from Jeffy Epstein's estate
BAHHAHHAAAAA
oh look! this isn't enough for Mayor Commie Mandami !!!
this is what that cockbiter socialist REALLY wants .....
In Cuba, one of the first tings they did was to confiscate single family residences and house multiple lower income (or no income) families in them. The same thing happened in Venezuela under Chavez.
If you do not think the could happen in NYC, think of how the eminent domaine laws could be bused to accomplish that.
I fully expect that condominium apartment buildings will be taken over fin that way for public housing.
In Cuba, one of the first tings they did was to confiscate large single family residences and house multiple lower income (or no income) families in them. The same thing happened in Venezuela under Chavez.
If you do not think the could happen in NYC, think of how the eminent domaine laws could be bused to accomplish that.
I fully expect that condominium apartment buildings will be taken over fin that way for public housing.
AI take:
New York eminent domain laws, governed by the Eminent Domain Procedure Law (EDPL), allow the government to take private property for "public use" (like roads, parks, or development) if they provide "just compensation" (fair market value) and follow strict procedures, including public hearings, notice to owners, and a determination of necessity, with property owners able to challenge the taking's justification or compensation amount. While Kelo v. New London expanded public use to include economic development, NY law aims to protect owners through these processes, ensuring fair treatment and avenues for challenging unjustified seizures or inadequate payments, notes Silverberg Zalantis LLC and the Owners’ Counsel of America.
AI take:
New York eminent domain laws, governed by the Eminent Domain Procedure Law (EDPL), allow the government to take private property for "public use" (like roads, parks, or development) if they provide "just compensation" (fair market value) and follow strict procedures, including public hearings, notice to owners, and a determination of necessity, with property owners able to challenge the taking's justification or compensation amount. While Kelo v. New London expanded public use to include economic development, NY law aims to protect owners through these processes, ensuring fair treatment and avenues for challenging unjustified seizures or inadequate payments, notes Silverberg Zalantis LLC and the Owners’ Counsel of America.
socialism is not a justification for eminent domain. and why should these owners be subjected to this for the sake of socialism? just wait till they try to seize some otherwise liberal judge's condo and see how fast he becomes a conservative.
socialism is not a justification for eminent domain. and why should these owners be subjected to this for the sake of socialism? just wait till they try to seize some otherwise liberal judge's condo and see how fast he becomes a conservative.
You seem to miss that NY eminent domain includes a bit more than Weaver/Mamdani just making a declaration... if they provide "just compensation" (fair market value) and follow strict procedures, including public hearings, notice to owners, and a determination of necessity, with property owners able to challenge the taking's justification or compensation amount.
Public Hearing: Before acquiring property, the condemnor must conduct a public hearing to review the public use and environmental impact.
Notice: Property owners must receive notice 10 to 30 days prior to the hearing via personal service or certified mail.
Scope: The hearing outlines the project purpose, location, and impacts. Any attendee may present oral or written statements.
Determination and Findings: Within 90 days of the hearing record closing, the condemnor must issue and publish a synopsis of its "Determination and Findings".
Negotiation and Offer:
Appraisal: The condemnor must have the property appraised. Owners are required to allow access for this inspection.
100% Offer: The condemnor must make a written offer to purchase the property for 100% of its highest approved appraisal value.
Advance Payment: If the owner rejects the offer, they can still accept it as an "advance payment" without waiving their right to seek additional compensation in court.
You seem to miss that NY eminent domain includes a bit more than Weaver/Mamdani just making a declaration... if they provide "just compensation" (fair market value) and follow strict procedures, including public hearings, notice to owners, and a determination of necessity, with property owners able to challenge the taking's justification or compensation amount.
Public Hearing: Before acquiring property, the condemnor must conduct a public hearing to review the public use and environmental impact.
Notice: Property owners must receive notice 10 to 30 days prior to the hearing via personal service or certified mail.
Scope: The hearing outlines the project purpose, location, and impacts. Any attendee may present oral or written statements.
Determination and Findings: Within 90 days of the hearing record closing, the condemnor must issue and publish a synopsis of its "Determination and Findings".
Negotiation and Offer:
Appraisal: The condemnor must have the property appraised. Owners are required to allow access for this inspection.
100% Offer: The condemnor must make a written offer to purchase the property for 100% of its highest approved appraisal value.
Advance Payment: If the owner rejects the offer, they can still accept it as an "advance payment" without waiving their right to seek additional compensation in court.
Tell that to all the 100s of 1000's folks, mostly poor working class Irish, German, Eastern Europeans, Jewish, Italian, Puerto Rican, and Blacks in NYC who lost their homes and apartments when NYC build the subways and highways:
*Urban renewal 1940s-1970s which used eminent domain to seize property
*The Cross Bronx Expressway 1948-1972
*Brooklyn-Queens Expressway 1937-1964
*Demolition of blocks of Black neighborhoods from 1903-1098 to built the Penn Station
socialism is not a justification for eminent domain. and why should these owners be subjected to this for the sake of socialism? just wait till they try to seize some otherwise liberal judge's condo and see how fast he becomes a conservative.
Precisely...that's why Mamdani/Weaver would face a very, very difficult task in any confiscation of private property. And they know that.
Precisely...that's why Mamdani/Weaver would face a very, very difficult task in any confiscation of private property. And they know that.
and yet this was a major component of Mandami's so like all politicians he lied to get elected.
and where is he going to get the funds for free buses and subways? tax the rich? he doesn't have the authority to do that and he knows it. it's all bullshit.
and the wealthy residents will simply move out of the city to avoid it and reduce the tax base greatly which will impact all basic services then he'll have to get Albany to fund his socialist agenda. good luck with that.
and yet this was a major component of Mandami's so like all politicians he lied to get elected.
and where is he going to get the funds for free buses and subways? tax the rich? he doesn't have the authority to do that and he knows it. it's all bullshit.
and the wealthy residents will simply move out of the city to avoid it and reduce the tax base greatly which will impact all basic services then he'll have to get Albany to fund his socialist agenda. good luck with that.
What happens when the wealthiest leave New York? I wonder if Mandami ever thinks about that. Then what about the Police. New York has 40, 000 sworn Officers to serve and protect the citizens of New York. As Cops retire, resign ect. It will get harder and harder to replace them. New York will eventually resemble a true third world hell hole.
What happens when the wealthiest leave New York? I wonder if Mandami ever thinks about that. Then what about the Police. New York has 40, 000 sworn Officers to serve and protect the citizens of New York. As Cops retire, resign ect. It will get harder and harder to replace them. New York will eventually resemble a true third world hell hole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
would you spread the wealth if you were wealthy?
i wouldn't and i don't think you would either.
I think I heard a mouse fart since I didn't hear "socialism"
