Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis just got some more horrible news. A judge has ordered her to pay over $54,000 in attorney’s fees and hand over documents her office held in violation of Georgia’s Open Records Act.
Willis withheld important documentation related to the prosecution against President Donald Trump. Ashleigh Merchant, the attorney who filed an open records request to obtain information related to Willis’ inappropriate relationship with another prosecutor she had appointed to Trump’s case, said she had been “completely stonewalled” by Willis’ office in September 2023, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Merchant said she requested about a dozen sets of records from the DA’s office, including non-disclosure agreements employees are required to sign, a list of attorneys hired by Willis since taking office and receipts for the DA’s contract with a New York-based “media monitoring service.”
The ruling, issued Friday by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Rachel Krause, marks a rare win for those seeking access to public records held by government agencies.
Krause determined the DA’s office failed to comply with Georgia’s Open Records Act by withholding public documents and said those failures “were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious.”
Because the DA’s office lacked justification for denying the records, Willis’ office must pay attorney fees and litigation expenses to Merchant, her husband, John, and the attorney couple’s paralegal, all of whom worked to get the records, the judge ruled.
The court order noted that Dexter Bond, the Open Records Custodian, was “openly hostile to counsel for Plaintiff, Ms. Merchant, and testified that Ms. Merchant’s requests were handled differently than other requests,” according to Fox News.
Bond, who testified that his usual practice was to call a requestor to receive additional information to fulfill requests, indicated that he refused to communicate with Merchant by telephone, the court order stated.
"While there is no requirement under the ORA for Mr. Bond to call any requestor about a particular request, Mr. Bond's handling of Ms. Merchant's requests in this manner indicates a lack of good faith," the order said. "Defendants’ failures were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious."
This entire case was a mess. You would think that if you were a prosecutor trying to prosecute a presidential candidate to influence the outcome of an election, you would have your you-know-what together.
Yet, Willis’ team completely botched this case. The notion that they tried to conceal Willis’ affair with another prosecutor goes to show just how corrupt this office is. It’s good that the judge ruled in Merchant’s favor, but perhaps it is time to start discussing whether Willis should keep her job.
Salty told ya!
#### TWK
BAHHAHAAAAAA
... Well, just this week - President Trump and some o' those
"co-defendants" are seeking re-imbursements for their expence
and legal fees under Georgia Law.
President Trump - just Himself - is seeking over $6 Million.
... Surely would seem that Fani CONTINUES to cost the
Georgia tax-paying people $$$$$ money due to her Georgia
elections "fraud case"...
... Uh... Lads? ... They simply recounted the same ballots.
And STILL got the count WRONG... Remember Mr. Rossi's complaint?
And you're forgetting something - the looking-about NOW
with things goes well beyonde yer mate Salty.
The Georgia Board of Elections and the DOJ are involved.
.. So, let's wait for their findings, shall we?
#### Salty
Well if the DoJ is involved it must mean the heat about the Epstein files has the administration looking for yet another diversion and distraction. Not attempting to hijack at all, just pointing out that you said DoJ is now on it....when they clearly have more than they can handle.
... No, the DOJ involvement has nothing to do with Epstein, mate.
It's because MORE of the whistleblower complaints from 2020
have come to light - the same ones that Raffensperger wicked aside.
That is also WHY the Georgia Board of Elections is also seeking answers.
What President Trump asked for in those Raffensperger phone calls
- a Judge to look at the complaints and evidence.
... Hmmm. Is it just me-owm imagination, or has Guv. Brian Kemp
simply disappeared from this issue?? ...
Surely haven't heard from him since Easter! ...
... No, the DOJ involvement has nothing to do with Epstein, mate....
I'm tempted to say "bull-fucking-shit" there. But you are probably right. It is much more likely that they are just doing whatever the fuck Trump wants. So today, it is to go after Fani. Tomorrow it will be the next item on the list. They will get back to Epstein soon, though.
The idea that YOU think that WE think that the DOJ has any credibility...in this or any other matter right now....is fucking hysterical.
It completely undermines the validity of your "beliefs" about this.
Same thing with the Georgia Board of Elections. They are just another MAGA weapon being used to further the long term goal of undermining election integrity and causing voter distrust.
Everyone who pays the slightest attention to this knows it.
You do too.
Which makes your relentless promotion of this inexcusable.
You make yourself look far worse than we ever could.
Trump audio tape of his phone call to the GA Secretary of State says it all.
The fact that he even made a phone call says more.
... He made more than one... Wanted the fraud claims by the whistleblowers addressed.
Wanted a Judge to review it all. ... Which is what the Georgia Board of Elections is reviewing.
I'm tempted to say "bull-fucking-shit" there. But you are probably right. It is much more likely that they are just doing whatever the fuck Trump wants. So today, it is to go after Fani. Tomorrow it will be the next item on the list. They will get back to Epstein soon, though.
The idea that YOU think that WE think that the DOJ has any credibility...in this or any other matter right now....is fucking hysterical.
It completely undermines the validity of your "beliefs" about this.
Same thing with the Georgia Board of Elections. They are just another MAGA weapon being used to further the long term goal of undermining election integrity and causing voter distrust.
Everyone who pays the slightest attention to this knows it.
You do too.
Which makes your relentless promotion of this inexcusable.
You make yourself look far worse than we ever could.
.
... Hey mate --- we get yer grief and Trump hatred.
(and yer face is awfully familiar )
THIS is me Fourth (4th) Georgia Elections thread.
... I've surely been REVIEWING all of this for FIVE (5) Years.
... And I got a good idea on what is "bullshit" and what is not.
... So, let's take a look at those ballots - and then we'll see.
... Uh... Lads? ... They simply recounted the same ballots.
And STILL got the count WRONG... Remember Mr. Rossi's complaint?
And you're forgetting something - the looking-about NOW
with things goes well beyonde yer mate Salty.
The Georgia Board of Elections and the DOJ are involved.
.. So, let's wait for their findings, shall we?
#### Salty
And the voters got who they voted for, right?
It is so surprising that maggies can't admit this. Sorta like George Costanza describes Kramer dumb luck and “falling ass backwards into money”. Regardless the procedures for counting, it ultimately showed that the voters got who they elected.
Why are maggies always so salty when things don't go there way, NaCl-y? Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaMan
Trump audio tape of his phone call to the GA Secretary of State says it all.
The fact that he even made a phone call says more.
Aw Man! Don't go side tracking a twisted tale only NaCl-y can do with this stuff!
It is so surprising that maggies can't admit this. Sorta like George Costanza describes Kramer dumb luck and “falling ass backwards into money”. Regardless the procedures for counting, it ultimately showed that the voters got who they elected.
... Hmmmmmm... So, as it stands now - Georgia has Biden "winning"
the state by HALF of 1% ... Though there's 20,000 votes
in dispute - Fraudulent ballots. ... Seeing-as the margin
of vote difference is less than 12,000 votes - WHAT IF
those votes DO turn out to be Fraudulent?
... Any reason WHY you believe Raffensperger's office
is STILL blocking the inspection of those ballots??
... Hmmmmmm... So, as it stands now - Georgia has Biden "winning"
the state by HALF of 1% ... Though there's 20,000 votes
in dispute - Fraudulent ballots. ... Seeing-as the margin
of vote difference is less than 12,000 votes - WHAT IF
those votes DO turn out to be Fraudulent?
... Any reason WHY you believe Raffensperger's office
is STILL blocking the inspection of those ballots??
#### Salty
NaCl-y, your feet are all thumbs. You still dancing around answering a direct question: with all repeated recounts pointing to the same thing: the votes that the people cast correctly put the person in office that the voters wanted. Regardless of clerical errors.
Right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again
... Just Wait! ...
#### Salty
Quote:
Originally Posted by RX792P
Been waiting since about May 2020...."greatest Rigged Election in history"
Nothing of note yet.
December 14, 2025
“We have all the ammunition, all the stuff, and you’ll see it come out. It’s coming out in truckloads.”
... I don't believe all the votes were cast correctly, mate.
Aint that rather obvious?? ... And at this point even the
Georgia Board of Elections are startin' to also wonder.
... And they've ordered that those ballots I constantly mention
AND their corresponding envelopes be turned over for Inspection.
... I believe the deadline may be sometime this week.
So, we'll surely see IF Sec. of State Raffensperger's office complies.
)
