Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Scientific American has been captured by ideologues. It's been agenda driven for years now and serious scientific types have abandoned it.
The woman mentioned in the opening of the article is clearly a woman. Because she's pregnant. If the phenotype results in a person who has the anatomy requisite to gestate a child, they are female. Even if they are sterile and have deformed or underdeveloped female parts. Which is a common condition. Genetic anomalies don't establish a gender spectrum they verify the binary.
If a person thinks they are someone that they are not, hat person has a problem hat Neds counseling or therapy.
Whether or not they can compete against others not of their sex shouldn't even be a discussion.
A few decades ago, here was a woman who claimed to be the youngest daughter of the last Tzar of Imperial Russia, Princess Anastasia. She was convincing and many believed that she was in fact the last heir of that royal family.
Time passed and science developed the technology of DNA studies. And they did a genetic test. Turns out she was no more a Romaov than Elizabeth Warren is a Native American.
A man may claim to be a woman and he might really believe it . . .but the genetic content of every cell in his body still proves that he is a man. . . .a man who needs counseling or psychiatric therapy.
It seems maggies don't want to touch that one with their cut-n-dry morals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812
Follow the science: Morality has nothing to do with who is female and who is male.
M orality should be an issue where it comes to manipulating the minds and bodies of . . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812
Science and morality in the context of this discussion may be related, u they ae separate.
And so far, no one has refuted anything I have posted on the science of sex determination. It is settled science.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Precious_b
So than, which door y'all point them to?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812
If a person thinks they are someone that they are not, hat person has a problem hat Neds counseling or therapy.
Whether or not they can compete against others not of their sex shouldn't even be a discussion.
A few decades ago, here was a woman who claimed to be the youngest daughter of the last Tzar of Imperial Russia, Princess Anastasia. She was convincing and many believed that she was in fact the last heir of that royal family.
Time passed and science developed the technology of DNA studies. And they did a genetic test. Turns out she was no more a Romaov than Elizabeth Warren is a Native American.
A man may claim to be a woman and he might really believe it . . .but the genetic content of every cell in his body still proves that he is a man. . . .a man who needs counseling or psychiatric therapy.
The freedom to publish or speak one's beliefs is a fundamental right enumerated in the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights. But the veracity of anyone's position is not guaranteed. by the constitutional guarantee of those rights.
A person may alter their appearance and practice behaving differently, but that does not actually change one's sex. The genetic nature of sex in humans, what establishes one as male and female, has been pear reviewed, settled science for about a century . While it may be possible to manipulate the outward appearance of an individual, one cannot change the genetic content that makes us fundamentally male or female.
It is as a matter of fact, " . . . as simple as that."
Lets all keep the discussion on the pros and cons of the topic, not wander off into other things.
My position is that males are males and females are females. . . .and this distinction is determined by one's genetic makeup.
And yes, as someone has pointed out above, there ae a few, Avery few, individuals born with genetic anomalies that may be manifested in their overt phenotype. . . . .but not in the numbers seen today as identifying as trans-whatever, most of whom if not all, actually have the genetics and body of a "normal" person.
